|
continuation of the lesson
8. Principles of Counterpoint
“Why would you consider that traditional counterpoint would apply to writing something more modern?” I hear you ask. “For a number of reasons”, I will reply.
Regardless of what harmonic language we use, some of the basic concepts of strict counterpoint continue to apply in some way to our composition.
Density of texture: In counterpoint, the addition or loss of a voice creates a change in “weight”. Going from three voices to four is a major event in a four part fugue. Likewise, in a full orchestral piece, the addition of a single, independent melodic line is noticable in the overall texture. The main consideration here is that of relative weight. In a rising figure for flute, with string accompaniment, if you add the rest of the woodwinds as a group, their entrance will be noticed as such – an entrance. If your intention is to create a gradual thickening of texture (or a crescendo) then it becomes your job to stagger those entrances in such a way as to smooth the effect and make it less noticable.
In counterpoint, generally, voices enter/leave at cadential moments. That is, the harmony prepares the ear for an event, whether it be the arrival or departure of a voice. It is a counterpoint error to have a voice disappear on an unresolved tension. This same idea should carry over into your work with any other composition for a large ensemble, with a slightly different approach. Any large change in the density of your ensemble should be motivated by the thematic material and supported by the harmony. While a sudden change in density might seem exciting musically, if you are creating major shifts in density at every other measure, the effect very quickly becomes tiring to the listener. This is particularly noticable in music of a sustained nature.
One approach to smoothing over transitions from one density to another is to treat those junctures slightly differently from an orchestration point of view. For example, if we were going from a full tutti to a section of only strings, it would help smooth the transition if we had some instruments from the tutti carry over for the opening of the string phrase. A “classical” approach to this might be a sustained octave in a pair of horns.
COMPOSITIONAL NOTE: This is also a point where the transition might be used to repeat the “head” of whatever thematic material you are using. In this change from the orchestral tutti to the string sectional, we might have the full orchestra cadence, then strings and part of the woodwinds on the opening notes of the phrase, then REPEAT the opening notes once more with just the strings.
Suspensions: Suspensions are notes from a previous harmony that are carried over into a new harmony and resolved. (see the image below)
One important detail about suspensions is that you should never hear the suspended note at the same time as its resolution note in another voice. In the example below, the “C” is suspended into the harmony of G major. The normal resolution of that C is down to B natural. It would be very wrong for any other voice to play a B natural at the same time as the C. This despite the fact that B natural is an integral part of the harmony of the measure.
This might seem like a trivial detail, but the larger part of the effect of a suspension is the anticipation of its resolution. If you are already presenting the resolution beneath (or even above) the suspended note, then it in effect no longer HAS a resolution.
Suspensions are STILL used even in more contemporary harmony, and the same rule still applies regardless of the nature of your harmonic language.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach."
-Aristotle-
"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-
In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
|