View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Nov 30 2007, 12:33 AM
spherenine spherenine is offline

spherenine's Avatar

Sexy Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 1-June 07
Posts: 926
Member Number: 2886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Okay, music is made of sound. Sound is made of regions of compression and rarefaction in the air. I still fail to see where soul and passion come in.

My guess is that you are completely stuck in your head and that you enjoy music on an intellectual level only.

It seems to me that a lot of people who are into classical music seem to be this way, extremely intellectual and analyzing music as they listen to it. They reject popular music and say that it is inferior. This of course comes from the mind/ego.

Funnily enough to me it seems that a lot of people who are into popular music, like R'n'B and stuff, enjoy music only on a "social conditioning" level, i.e. "Will my friends think I'm cool if I have this song on my iPod?"
They reject classical music and say that it is inferior. This also comes from the mind/ego.

Two sides of the same coin.

To me, the heart and soul is where we transcend all of this and actually begin to feel music, truly enjoying it for what it is.
I wonder if Mr. Psychology here can realize his superiority complex. . .

Anyway, you're just making assumptions that, well, just plain aren't true. Music can evoke emotions from people for sure, but that really just, uh, proves nothing. It doesn't mean that Bach's music is more "emotional" and therefore superior to Mozart's, or vice versa. Bach's music is music, just as Gwen Stefani's is.

And frankly, I'm a bigger fan of Stefani. Take that.
__________________
"Folie à Deux"
"Harmpit"
"In Satan's Foyer"

Just listen to "Harmpit" and tell me that it doesn't make your bowels shake at least a little. I dare you.
Reply With Quote