Quote:
Originally Posted by EnigmusJ4
Listening to the same thing over and over, trying to decide if I can do it any better is something I happen to do very often. The idea of listening to a passage in many different realizations is something I haven't really thought much of, and I certainly will from now on. Thank you, Michel.
I hope you didn't miss my new Exercise 6 back there, post #155 . I would like to know of anything I did poorly in it.
This *might* take you straight to it. Orchestration: PART 1 (woodwinds) discussion |
Hiyas!
sorry I mised that.. I saw your comments on the preceding post, but missed that you had attached a new exercise!
Velly Solly. /bow
Ok, it's pretty good!
Only thing I'm a tiny bit queezy about is the extremely agitated piccolo part. Remember that lots of movement attracts the ear.
The horns don't seem overly agitated.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach."
-Aristotle-
"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-
In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
|