View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Feb 5 2008, 2:05 PM
QcCowboy QcCowboy is offline

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,584
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkingwikipedia View Post
P.S. to Qccowboy...
I question the need to reply to my opinions not with rebuttal/opposing opinions but rather with statements suggesting I don't know what I'm talking about. To me this is mildly offensive and I respectfully ask for you to offer healthy debate (even briefly)/constructive comments, or stay silent.
if you had somethig to rebutt or oppose other than your banal statement regarding John Williams, then I might have.

I didn't say you were wrong about FILM music, I said you were limited in your assessment of John Williams as a composer, who HAS composed concert works (concerti, etc...).

I happen to have the highest regard for many of his concert works (and I don't mean "olympic fanfares" and his other incidental concert works, which bear more likeness to his filmscores than to his true concert works).

I DID say that it was "ill advised" to simply dismiss film composers in the manner you did. It isn't all second rate music. I wouldn't give it to any of my students to study; however, it suits its purpose effectively. I liken (good) filmscores in many ways to opera and ballet.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote