View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mar 21 2008, 7:12 PM
Zetetic Zetetic is offline

Zetetic's Avatar

Knight of the Keyboard
Group: Members
Joined: 17-February 07
Posts: 478
Member Number: 2210
The idea of looking for those aspects I appreciate in other composers' works is an excellent idea. Exploring other forms of complex counterpoint is something I'm already doing - from Palestrina to Vivaldi to Gesualdo. I feel I ought to move beyond 1750 now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
Complex counterpoint is rather untypical for baroque though. You'll see a lot more of it in the 19th century (or in the music before baroque) than in baroque.
It took me a surprisingly long time to realise this. Telemann's music is actually mainly homophonic (or more accurately, is largely in counterpoint that has similar note durations). I think the reason Bach stands out from most of his contemporaries is his gift for, and remarkably relentless use of, complex counterpoint. I'm not sure I can force myself to move on. I'll try listening to lots of early Mozart and Haydn this week, and see what happens. At the moment it still sounds rather lightweight - which seems a ludicrous thing to say.

I confess to adoring late Mozart. I'll try working backwards on that front. . . . .
__________________
If I take the time to review one of your pieces, I'd really appreciate it if you did the same for me.

Major threads running
Competition: Original Work for Theremin and Piano (prize = recording!)
Works currently posted:
Neoclassical Fantasia and Fugue for String Quartet - 16 March 2008
Reply With Quote