View Single Post
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Apr 3 2008, 2:19 PM
QcCowboy QcCowboy is offline

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,624
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by gianluca View Post
So, your point being what? Some genius composers may be (unjustly) forgotten, whereas some mediocre composers may be remembered.
ah, so... are you, um, immodestly comparing yourself to Sibelius?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gianluca View Post
and I'm pleased to have read an interview with Boulez in which he expressed the same view
HAHAHA
yes, quote Boulez... the man who said "before me, there was no music"

Quote:
Originally Posted by gianluca View Post
Furthermore, the one-movement form of Sibelius' Seventh isn't that innovative or unconventional. Something similar had already been done by Schoenberg in his first Chamber Symphony (written in 1906!), which also has several individual sections integrated into a single uninterrupted organic form, and which moreover has a greater structural complexity and a much more advanced harmonic language than Sibelius' 7th.
And simply because you fail to comprehend the complexity of Sibelius' music does not MAKE it in any way less complex. Your superficial assessment of Sibelius is simply more demonstration that your opinions have very little actual value.

But then, Gianluca, your credibility on this forum was shot months ago.

If you don't like tonal music, or neo-tonal music, just stay out of threads dealing with it. You just come acoss as another elitist ass.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote