View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old May 2 2008, 4:27 PM
flint-wwrr flint-wwrr is online now

flint-wwrr's Avatar

Head Cheerleader
Group: Members
Joined: 10-August 07
Posts: 711
Member Number: 3361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Userdoe1560 View Post
Play measure 127 on the piano. Does it sound muddy? I don't think so. If the ensemble was attacking and releasing more clearly, I think that issue would be remedied.
That is your problem right there. You cannot translate that sound from a piano to an ensemble. The only reason it doesn't sound as muddy on a piano is due to the nature of the piano itself. It's not your ensemble's issue, it's yours. It will simply always sound muddy due to the register and the instuments involved.

Quote:
Yes, I know the background parts are boring. I have a few good reasons. Firstly, they aren't supposed to draw the ear because they are background (duh). Honestly, I prefer it that way.
You want your music to be boring and two-dimensional? You may want to re-think that idea. Writing interesting backgrounds is an important skill and an important facet to composing interesting music. Because let's face it, if the only interesting part is the melody, the music becomes boring!

Quote:
As for the 32nd notes...how do they not fit in? If I wrote two whole notes tied together, would that be out of place? As far as I'm concerned, it's a simple straight rhythm, just like the rest of the piece.
I'm saying that suddenly your woodwinds go into "double time" and while the rest of the ensemble doesn't change. That sounds out of place to my ears.

Quote:
As a matter of fact, if I had written more dissonant harmonies, I'm sure you would criticize them for being inconsistent with the rest of the work.
Not if you incorporate them intelligently. Dissonance doesn't necessarily mean jumping from Bach to Stravinsky. Simply adding added 6th's, 7th's, 9th's, or even passing tones would be more interesting.

Quote:
pppp is excessive, I'll give you that. ffff is not. It gets the point across. I can promise you that if I had ff or even fff written there, that section wouldn't sound as good as it does.
Well, I disagree. I've never found that exceeding ppp or fff has ever been effective or necessary. Feel free to disagree, though. Personally, every time I've been in an ensemble and there has been a written ffff, the ensemble simply plays unmusically.

Quote:
Although I appreciate your criticism, the last line is patronizing. You cannot congratulate someone on something and then basically call what you just congratulated weak.
It's unfortunate you felt that that was patronizing, that certainly wasn't my intent. I certainly stand by my statement and think that you could truly improve what you have written with changes.
__________________
Woodwind specialist: Piccolo • Flute • Alto Flute • Bass Flute • Oboe • English Horn • Eb, Bb, A, Alto, Bass, Contra-alto, and Contrabass Clarinet • Basset Horn • Soprano, Alto, Tenor, and Baritone Saxophone • Bassoon • Recorder • Voice: Bass-Baritone/Counter-tenor
Reply With Quote