View Single Post
  #86 (permalink)  
Old May 17 2008, 10:59 AM
QcCowboy QcCowboy is offline

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,584
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by gianluca View Post
The thing is, it is so darn difficult to still use tonal elements in a GOOD, new and original way. So I think the question that's still relevant today is: is it still possible to do something truly new and original with diatonicism (tonality) in a way that hasn't been done before?
This is no less true of non-tonal music.
The only problem is some people insist on accusing ANY use of tonality of being "unoriginal".
I could levy the exact same accusations at perpetrators of atonality, saying that nothing they are doing is original anyways.

Which, of course, is why I prefer to promote open-mindedness and tolerance and acceptance of ALL music that is at least attempting to reflect the world in which we live.

There is a way of writing tonal music that is a reflection of the 21st century. Regardless of whether Gianluca appreciates it or not.

And there is a way of writing non-tonal music that is perfectly passé and out-of-date, a reflection of a world we no longer live in, an artistic pretention of "newness" that in no way takes into account the last 50 years of history.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote