|
Since I already wrote about my general thoughts about this kind of music in your other thread, I will refrain from doing so here.
From the looks, I'd definitely prefer the other piece, but of course that isn't what counts the most in a piece of music. Musically, this has something speaking for itself: Its very simple form and clarity. The musician can decide on a way of interpreting it and no matter in what musical parameters this line will be translated it probably -will- have a clearly audible result that can be credited to the score. Your other piece is more complex and ambiguous, which -may- lead to a fascinating plurality of interpretations which still keep aspects of the score, or it may turn out incomprehensible, as the different interpretations of all the elements in the score cancel each other out and you get a grey mass of sound without any direction. Personally I think the more open and free your scores are, the simpler they have to be for them still to have an effect. Therefore I really appreciate this one.
I keep some general doubts which I voiced in the other thread, but here I think it may work rather well without specifying anything more about the piece, whereas the other one might simply turn out random, to say it bluntly.
|