View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old May 26 2008, 2:09 AM
Kathreptes Kathreptes is offline

Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 18-March 08
Posts: 33
Member Number: 4453
Thank you all for the advice. The fugue was giving me a devil of a time until I simplified the ostinato. Hopefully it's not too random sounding? The key modulations may be a tad bit sloppy, as well as other parts of it (though it sounds much better than the many parts I discarded... writing this thing was much harder than the passacaglia by far!). Although I'm sick of working on this, after taking a break from it for a time I may try to get back in and reorganize it more efficiently like I did with the passacaglia (as compared to its older versions).

This pieces does sound suggestive of singing (its why it made me think of a dead/drowning ships crew singing of their sorrows and adventures).

I had to take the advice I received on simplifying the ostinato to be more suitable for a fugue (but only for the fugue). Something about it is still sloppy. I can't believe how long this is now (about 8 minutes 20 seconds or so).

I saved the sibelius file in version 4 compatibility.

As for the soundfont I am using, it's called Orgue and you can obtain it here: Organ Soundonts in a rar archive

Orgue only goes down to C3. I had to cheat by warping its sound down one octave to achieve a better range (using two channels, one deepened, one normal).


Edit: blech after giving this another listen, I'm wondering how the devil I missed all the mistakes in alignment before the romp in major keys. Well at least it's useful for ideas... and a coda. Yeah, I need to sleep.

And finally the mp3 for those who want it.
Passacaglia_&_Fugal_Inv_No1_in_Bm
Attached Files
File Type: sib Seridar_in_Bm.sib (73.3 KB, 5 views)
File Type: mid Seridar_in_Bm.mid (24.8 KB, 4 views)

All music files uploaded by this user

Last edited by Kathreptes : May 28 2008 at 6:04 PM. Reason: fixed a spelling error
Reply With Quote