|
But see the thing is, if I can play the same piece of "music" twice and come up with two completely different things, then how can the credit for those things go to the person who published a picture? I mean, what he's really publishing is an abstract emotional idea that may INSPIRE music, but not music itself.
To me it's like if someone painted a picture of me and I then claimed to have physically painted the picture and justified it because I was what the painting was based off of. Not the greatest analogy but that's basically how I see it.
|