View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Jun 10 2008, 3:14 AM
nikolas nikolas is online now

nikolas's Avatar

freelance composer
Group: Members
Joined: 18-April 07
Posts: 1,721
Member Number: 2606
Both notation programs are good imho. They both can end up with brilliant results. As far as notation goes! I happen to use finale, that's all!

And I'm on a PC and no plans of changing. And I use Cubase, as well!

The program, that you mention should exist, doesn't exist for a very good reason. A good sequencer goes beyond notation, and into audio. For example, I have a habbit of mixing in audio. with the little fade ins and outs, the crossfades, the easy change of volume, tweaking, on the fly plug-ins, etc. And to further sound design, all of which are in the heart of every sequencer. There isn't a midi only sequencer, but there are sequencers which are better in audio rather than midi (Pro-tools come to mind! ). In short, a sequencer will have extended audio capabilities, which is what separates notation and sequence!

Both S and F, work in xp and Vista as far as I know (the latest editions, at least). I know that Finale (unofficially) works well in Vista in previous editions, but it's not supported by Makemusic (I checked their website). No idea for S.
__________________
www.nikolas-sideris.com
www.cgempire.com
Reply With Quote