View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old May 7 2006, 9:10 PM
Nicola Canzano Nicola Canzano is offline

Nicola Canzano's Avatar

Banned
Group: Banned
Joined: 3-December 05
Posts: 4,763
Member Number: 363
I agree with leightwing on a lot of points. I think he pretty much has his head screwed on tight when it comes to musical knowledge, so you should listen to him . Reguarding the time signature, I really think you could EASILY transpose this to 6/4 or 6/8. Maybe even 3/4 if you really felt like it. The point is...it doesn't feel like 7/4. You can look at it as a hemiola, but i highly doubt that was your intention.

Requarding the piece itself, I think your overall feel is pretty good. However all the details like you know...the notes, are kind of skewed. What I mean by this is: you have a good idea of what your piece should sound like, and the mood of it is almost there, but when you go put it on paper, it almost fails.

It's a rather dissonant piece, whether this was intentional or not, but i thought it was kind of cool. 7/4 + dissonance = . It grabs your attention, which is good, but it really kinda gets [<--boring]. I don't think this piece had any kind of form, which is ok, but it was kind of pointless. It's hard for me to say that because every piece of music has a feel, so it has a point, but what I guess I'm trying to say is it didn't go anywhere. Dissonance can be cool and all, but bunches of unnecessary randomness just...doesn't make for good music. .


I think if you keep at it, you could become a decent composer. Study some Schoenberg if you're going down the dreaded path of atonalism (as i like to call it), but even Schoenberg knew what he was writing, pure dissonance or not.

~Nico
Reply With Quote