Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Register  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Discussion > Composer's Headquarters

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Feb 3 2008, 9:43 PM
SSC SSC is offline

SSC's Avatar

Stop faking enthusiasm!
Group: Members
Joined: 8-December 07
Posts: 1,657
Member Number: 3897
The Trautonium needs a comeback (Oskar Sala forever!)

And of course one thing is acoustic instruments and sounds, another entire spectrum is electronic or electro-acoustic.

You can pretty much engineer just about any sound you want these days, and all the technology allows for total-manipulation of frequencies, etc etc.

So really, it surprises me that this isn't considered.

Me and a student at the Stuttgart Hochschule were discussing this topic once, and he said "Composers these days have no interest for electronic music. They prefer to stick to their violin and piano duos!" And I found it funny, as I had just written something for violin and piano, but we were talking because he was showing me around the old machinery such as synthesizers and stuff from the 60s and such.

All of it abandoned and gathering dust. Surely, working like the pioneers did in the 60s and earlier with electronic music is a labor of love more than anything. With weeks upon weeks of cutting tiny tapes and measuring, cutting again, pasting things together.

If music education wasn't so trend-oriented, certainly this should take up as much time as 1+1=2 harmony lessons or orchestration, as what one can learn from working with pure raw sound in such a form is priceless. These days we are lucky that computers that can do all this mindless processing came along, and it's a lot easier to work with synthesis of any type than it used to be.

But at the same time, maybe that's why nobody thinks about it much now. In essence, electronic music lives on in many types of popular/consumption music, and it seems really difficult to escape the presence of music that uses samplers and synthesizers.

One cannot equal both things however, since simply the use of the equipment and techniques doesn't mean the same motive.

And I really would advise looking seriously into electronic music and such as a means of learning that sound, or for that matter, music isn't just what comes out of a violin or a piano. There's millions of tiny parameters and variations that make instruments sound like they do, and learning about these things, the very nature of what a composer sets out to work with.

Though it is undoubtedly easier to write something for violin or piano than spend eight weeks defining one single waveform to sound like you want it to sound on a machine that takes up an entire room. But for some (like me) it has its charm.
Reply With Quote
 

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 4:24 PM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers