Originally Posted by EnigmusJ4
Yes, but would you not agree that string players and vocalists are best known to overuse vibrato?
My opinion on vibrato stands somewhere near Daniels. The pure, straight tone of an instrument is beautiful, just not many can produce it, so they use vibrato to cover it up, thinking is it acceptable. And of course, this becomes second nature, and now professionals use it like mad. In my honest opinion, vibrato should NOT be used whatsoever in music, about, pre-1850's, or somewhere around that general time frame. That is my personal opinion, though. I also believe that vibrato should not be used by musicians participating as a member in an ensemble. For instance, I dislike vibrato used by each musician in say, the first violin section, or the 'cello section, or even vocal choir. I feel that it should only be used tastefully by designated soloists, such as in a concerto for instance.
My view for clarinet vibrato follows that, I feel is should not be used in a classical setting unless it is part of an extended solo, such as a concerto. As for short solos in orchestral works, I believe vibrato should not be used by any clarinet because the clarinet has a more distinctive tone without it, and so comes across as being more beautiful.
As for horn vibrato, I play horn and use it from time to time. It's just a natural instinct I picked up from playing trumpet. I'm sure this probably makes me sound like utter crap, though, because the nature and characteristics of the horn do not lend well to the use of a fluctuating tone, straight tone is the best way for the instrument to project, and it is more natural. Although in jazz horn, I differ. I love using a little vibrato here and there in jazz.
|