|
if you don't only want input from "young" composers" but from some of the "old" ones as well, well, speaking for myself, I'm a rather slow writer.
It partially depends on what I'm writing.
I have gotten the thematic ideas for a 6-minute symphonic movement out in a single afternoon, while I've struggled on a 4-minute clarinet sonata movement for months.
On the other hand, the "offical" longest time it's taken me to write a single piece, from conception to final score, was my Requiem, clocking in at a little over 10 years to complete for one hour of music. After a partial premiere, the work was withdrawn.
I've knocked off "quicky" pieces in as little as an hour. Especialy if I'm not as gung-ho about the notation. While my 2nd symphony is giving me a bit of a work-out, since only the first three movements are finished, and I've been banging away at the 4th movement for nearly 3 years now. (Nevermind the 5th movement, which is still barely on the drawing board)
1st symphony took me three months, working 6 days a week, averaging 12-14 hrs/day.
Clarinet sonata took me around 3-4 months.
Cello sonata took a little less than a month, if I recall correctly. Although the work underwent major revisions at a later date.
I find that when I get "stuck" it's often on an "ending" section. I guess I'm just one of those composers who hates to say goodbye.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach."
-Aristotle-
"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-
In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
|