Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Register  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Technological > Software and Hardware

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sep 3 2006, 9:54 PM

Elite Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 30-October 05
Posts: 1,424
Member Number: 280
HUMAN VOICE SYNTHESIZING

hi everybody! a friend of mine sent me this link to a software for synthesizing human voices, and the result in my opinion is quite extraordinary. i thinked i should share this with you! best regards!

http://www.virsyn.de/en/E_Products/E.../e_cantor.html
__________________
Brazilian amateur and self-taught composer, composing since 2002.

music:
[http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID =544908]

photo:
[http://tetraktys.multiply.com/photos]
Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 3:08 AM
JohnGalt

Guest
Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In
Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Ugh, the first demo I listened to was absolutely terrible. Way too much vibrato.

The Halleluja is also terrible. Obviously synthesized. I'd rather work with static pitches and Microsoft Sam.

Actually, that Halleluja almost inspires me to write a Stephen Hawking concerto.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 3:25 AM

giselle's Avatar

Miss Lady G
Group: Members
Joined: 9-October 05
Posts: 1,505
Member Number: 238
oh. my. lord.

The demos on that site are priceless. I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.

(I'm sorry, it's just that some of them are absolutely fantastic in a hilarious way)
__________________


"Prokofiev always had a weakness for sweets."

--Harlow Robinson, Sergei Prokofiev: a Biography

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 3:26 AM
JohnGalt

Guest
Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In
Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Pretty sorry demonstrations of technology if the company is wanting people to take them seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 3:39 AM

giselle's Avatar

Miss Lady G
Group: Members
Joined: 9-October 05
Posts: 1,505
Member Number: 238
my favorite.

This makes me want to spend money (thank you JG for this wonderful gift of a link):

I need your inspiration

__________________


"Prokofiev always had a weakness for sweets."

--Harlow Robinson, Sergei Prokofiev: a Biography

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 8:33 AM

montpellier's Avatar

Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 4-May 06
Posts: 1,383
Member Number: 796
Must admit I've heard worse by far.

The choir canon sounded ok for what it is.

The Ave Regina sounded less synthesised than samples stretched beyond their usable point - the magnitude of the formants changes with pitch change and you cen get away with a small pitch-change (about a semitone either side of sampled pitch) then things sound weird.

Still, not unlike the early "electronic pianos" - risible by today's standards, someone had to make a start.
I won't laugh at it - I could laugh at masses of stuff here but I don't because people try. The first orchestral samples/syntheses were abhorrent - I mean strings? Wha-a-a-at? . .but...we moved on.

My doubts concern the functional value of trying to synthesise the human voice when there are 7 billion around the place. Capturing every nuance is a pipe-dream. The effort might be better spent developing a new, synthesised sound based on the human voice and tell people if they want to compose for real choirs, go join one. Easy-peasy.

Having said that, this seems the way of our technological era: clothe the naked simplicities of life in swathes of technological complexity.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 12:38 PM

J. Lee Graham's Avatar

Old Timer
Group: Members
Joined: 2-July 05
Posts: 2,881
Member Number: 24
Giselle, that's priceless. I heard better than that in the 80s. It's gratifying to know that professional singers aren't going to be replaced electronically anytime soon. That said...

Quote:
My doubts concern the functional value of trying to synthesise the human voice when there are 7 billion around the place. Capturing every nuance is a pipe-dream. The effort might be better spent developing a new, synthesised sound based on the human voice and tell people if they want to compose for real choirs, go join one. Easy-peasy.
Having tried with almost no success to get the many choral directors I've worked with over the years to even give my works a reading, I've had it with the whole notion. My only other option would be to gather up some of my singer friends and do it myself. However, I could hardly ask them to take time out of their busy schedules without compensating them for it. Those days are long gone. Even college kids don't do anything for free anymore. I consider myself damned lucky to have a symphony up for performance by a local orchestra this month. All things considered, I'll put up with the technical inadequacies of synthesized instruments and voices. It's easier, and I'm tired of fighting.
__________________
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 8:46 PM

Lord Sorasen's Avatar

True Poetic
Group: Members
Joined: 15-September 05
Posts: 356
Member Number: 185
Hmm... Interesting little program. To be honest, I'd rather just use a "Voice Aah" then put robotic voices in, but some people use this method, I guess..
__________________
Latest song:http://www.youngcomposers.com/forum/...les-17159.html
Please give criticism? I'm desperate XD
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 10:14 PM

Cinematica
Group: Members
Joined: 29-November 05
Posts: 246
Member Number: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGalt View Post
The Halleluja is also terrible. Obviously synthesized. I'd rather work with static pitches and Microsoft Sam.
I don't see how you'd want to work with Microsoft Sam. Sam is the most retarded piece of shit. To be honest, this is one decent program. Synthesizers aren't suppose to be real. Not all computer generated sounds aim for realism. This one obviously tried, but reached it's limit.
__________________
kaiyoti.com
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sep 4 2006, 11:43 PM
JohnGalt

Guest
Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In
Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuicyPork View Post
I don't see how you'd want to work with Microsoft Sam. Sam is the most retarded piece of shit. To be honest, this is one decent program. Synthesizers aren't suppose to be real. Not all computer generated sounds aim for realism. This one obviously tried, but reached it's limit.
Looks like someone's too dense to spot a joke.
Reply With Quote
 

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:31 PM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers