|
ok, pretty good.
Now let's discuss "climax".
I notice that your climax was dynamic only.
You actually return to the same note as the climax in the final part of the melody. Why?
A side-note: measure 4, there is a rather important shift of register, and that makes it sound like a separate entity, a "countermelody" rather than an integral part of the melody. While motivically it IS related (and well-done, BTW), the register change is still an important effect. To me, it breaks the linearity of the melody you are building.
Also at measures 5 and 8 you repeat those high Cs, the effect is a bit static.
Remember that repeating a note or "note area" within a very short span (a few beats) gives the ear an "echo effect", but repeating the same material, even in different dynamics, at a longer interval creates insteead an effect of staticism - of not having left the area in question..
In strict tonal counterpoint, you learn to avoid returning to the same notes within short periods of time for this very reason. By this I don't mean a repeated note, but rather that a phrase returns to the same note within a few beats. or a measure or two.
Sometimes, the best thing when constructing a theme is to draw it graphically, to get a sense of where the highpoint will be and where the low points will be.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach."
-Aristotle-
"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-
In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
|