Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Search   Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Technological > Finale and Sibelius Help Desk

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old May 28 2008, 2:14 PM

Gardener's Avatar

Seasoned Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 29-November 07
Posts: 878
Member Number: 3849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Tokke View Post
No one has yet considered electronic instruments where the 15mb would certainly come into use. Extreme lowness!
Actually, a piano already comes very close to the lowest possible tone a human can hear. An A0, as the lowest piano tone, has a frequency of about 28 Hz, and humans can hear from about 20 Hz, which would be a D#0, so only a tritone below the lowest piano key. Sounds unbelievable but it's true! (And even if you say you can hear to 18 Hz or so, that only makes it about a half tone lower). (In the upper register however, we can hear up to slightly more than two octaves above the highest piano tone. As a random additional note, this of course also means that in the highest register of the piano we can only hear the overtones up to about the fourth partial, which explains why this register always sounds a bit duller than a bit lower tones.)

But to get back on topic: While writing a D#0 with a mere 8vb would still require quite a few ledger lines, it would still be quite readable. (Of course, using an 15ma bassa would work very fine too in such a case, I'm just saying it wouldn't be -necessary-).
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old May 28 2008, 2:18 PM

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,342
Member Number: 776
Flint is 110% right on here.

Before trying a less-than-standard notation device, you should try to use the most standard notational device possible to get the correct effect.

If we are refering specifically to the example posted above, I think that there are three perfectly standard means of approaching the notation would:
1. tiny clefs, one treble one bass, right above one another, just before the intended notes;
2. the addition of a third staff for the single bass note;
3. or placing material of BOTH treble staves into a single staff, and making the second staff a bass clef staff.

I prefer the 3rd choice.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 1:35 PM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers