Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Register  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Technological > Software and Hardware > Sound Libraries

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Aug 23 2008, 7:21 PM

Starving Musician
Group: Members
Joined: 23-August 08
Posts: 5
Member Number: 5348
Opinions on Sample Libraries

Hey there,
I am looking for some user feedback on the different sample libraries that are available these days. I am currently using old stock Reason Refills for arrangements, and obviosly there are limitations to getting a usable sound here.

So, I've bounced around the web and came up with a good impression of the quality of the sounds involved with the following:
Garritan Personal Orchestra
Garritan Jazz
East West Quantum Leap Gold and Platinum bundles
Vienna Symphonic (too many products here to list)

Anybody out there have experience with one or more of these?
I'd like to hear about workflow and how responsive or "smart" the sample programming is. What is the software package like for each parent sample set, and does it play nice with your host sequencing/notation program (ex. Cubase, Finale etc.)?

My needs:
Access to decent full orchestra and jazz combo sounds for my own arrangement purposes.
Access to very good quality string and piano samples for professional level film scoring (think piano quintet).

Thanks to anyone who can help!
Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 6:25 AM

J. Lee Graham's Avatar

Old Timer
Group: Members
Joined: 2-July 05
Posts: 2,881
Member Number: 24
I only have experience with Garritan Personal Orchestra, in association with Finale 2007. Overall I've been overjoyed with it, though I was disappointed at the relatively narrow choice of instruments. I gather that more recent versions have a wider variety. I wouldn't know anything about jazz combo sounds.
__________________
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 5:38 PM

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,584
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Lee Graham View Post
I only have experience with Garritan Personal Orchestra, in association with Finale 2007. Overall I've been overjoyed with it, though I was disappointed at the relatively narrow choice of instruments. I gather that more recent versions have a wider variety. I wouldn't know anything about jazz combo sounds.
No, it's not "more recent versions" that have more sounds, it's the "complete" version that has more sounds. "GPO for Finale" is a limited soundset.

An example: in GPO for Finale, there is only "Violins KS". While in the full GPO, there's 1st Violins KS, and 2nd Violins KS. As a matter of fact, the full version has a complete set of 1st violins with various articulations, as well as a complete matching set of 2nd violins.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 5:45 PM

J. Lee Graham's Avatar

Old Timer
Group: Members
Joined: 2-July 05
Posts: 2,881
Member Number: 24
Hmmm... I wonder why Finale doesn't have the whole set, then? The "full" set of GPO could have everything but the kitchen sink, but if it won't play my score, then it's useless to me.
__________________
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 5:46 PM

Daniel's Avatar

Caffeinated Composer
Group: Moderators
Joined: 25-August 05
Posts: 4,499
Member Number: 145
You have to buy it seperately. It's not dear, but I guess for the Finale version, as it comes bundled with it, they didn't want you to be getting everything. They still want to have a product to offer.
__________________
Have a listen to Whimsy - my silly new piece for Tuba & Piano!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oscar Wilde
"I am not English; I'm Irish which is quite another thing."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 6:21 PM

Professional Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 21-August 07
Posts: 237
Member Number: 3421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzle View Post
I am looking for some user feedback on the different sample libraries that are available these days. I am currently using old stock Reason Refills for arrangements, and obviously there are limitations to getting a usable sound here.
Agreed. While Reason is great for many other genres of music and functions, orchestral is not it's strong point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzle View Post
Anybody out there have experience with one or more of these?
I'd like to hear about workflow and how responsive or "smart" the sample programming is. What is the software package like for each parent sample set, and does it play nice with your host sequencing/notation program (ex. Cubase, Finale etc.)?
You make an interesting comment here: "smart" sample programming. Most of this doesn't lie on the sample but on the user. Finale integrates GPO into the playback taking care of most of the sample decisions for you. Other programs (Logic, Cubase, Sonar, Protools) don't do this for you, but give you much more freedom and flexibility in what kind(s) of samples you choose to use. If you're willing to learn what samples work for what kinds of musical lines and situations, then you'll get more realism and flexibility.

I use Logic and Sonar with VSTi. While I do use Pro Tools, I don't use VSTs very often with it. I use Pro Tools more as a mastering program. I've used East West and the VSL samples. I do have GPO as well, but find it the most limited out of the three.

Now based on your needs:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzle View Post
Access to decent full orchestra and jazz combo sounds for my own arrangement purposes. Access to very good quality string and piano samples for professional level film scoring (think piano quintet).
I think East West or VSL will be better for your needs. East West has a great, large Hollywood sound, but the Silver and Gold packages only have one mic setting available which has some embedded reverb. This can be a con when you're wanting to create intimate ensembles like string quartets. This is where VSL would serve you better, but just understand that you'll have to do a bit more processing to get a good sound. I also don't like the way VSL names their files- which makes the work flow a bit more cumbersome.

One thing you didn't mention is your budget. There is also Project SAM which is getting alot of attention and use by major composers for media. The top VSL package is around $20,000!! So what is your budget? This will help me give you some realistic options.

Thanks,

Nathan
__________________
Nathan Madsen
Composer-Sound Designer
www.madsenstudios.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Aug 24 2008, 6:47 PM

Gardener's Avatar

Elite Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 29-November 07
Posts: 1,156
Member Number: 3849
Quote:
Originally Posted by QcCowboy View Post
No, it's not "more recent versions" that have more sounds, it's the "complete" version that has more sounds. "GPO for Finale" is a limited soundset.

An example: in GPO for Finale, there is only "Violins KS". While in the full GPO, there's 1st Violins KS, and 2nd Violins KS. As a matter of fact, the full version has a complete set of 1st violins with various articulations, as well as a complete matching set of 2nd violins.
Ooh, so when I -do- have 1st/2nd Violins KS/Arco/Pizzicato/Tremolo etc. that means I have the full GPO? I never realized that. (I get Finale in a music software package package from my college and wasn't aware there also was a bigger GPO library in it than the one normally in Finale.)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Aug 25 2008, 3:28 AM

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,584
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
Ooh, so when I -do- have 1st/2nd Violins KS/Arco/Pizzicato/Tremolo etc. that means I have the full GPO? I never realized that. (I get Finale in a music software package package from my college and wasn't aware there also was a bigger GPO library in it than the one normally in Finale.)
if, when you look at the notation directory when choosing instruments, and you have a directory for 1st violins, and a second directory for 2nd violins, then you have the full version of GPO.

However, there is no Finale bundle, that I am aware of, that includes the complete GPO.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Aug 25 2008, 3:28 AM

Starving Musician
Group: Members
Joined: 23-August 08
Posts: 5
Member Number: 5348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Madsen View Post

You make an interesting comment here: "smart" sample programming. Most of this doesn't lie on the sample but on the user. Finale integrates GPO into the playback taking care of most of the sample decisions for you. Other programs (Logic, Cubase, Sonar, Protools) don't do this for you, but give you much more freedom and flexibility in what kind(s) of samples you choose to use. If you're willing to learn what samples work for what kinds of musical lines and situations, then you'll get more realism and flexibility. Nathan
So, a question: How do these programs handle articulations, and complex issues like multi-sampled repeated notes? It's been a long time since I worked with Finale (about 7 years), but I remember the playback responding to a few things like spicatto, pedal and dynamics, but does it recognize a wider range of score markings such as:
harmonics
glissando
sul ponticello
col legno
con sordino

If it doesen't would that mean I would have to setup a new instrument to do the job for each? Also, would MIDI exports contain all of the general orchestral markings in a format readable to your host sequencer (Cubase in my scenario), or would the sequencer disregard bow markings?
Another thing I am not clear on is, how do the samples (for any of the libraries) load into the sequencer? Does each instrument appear as a Vitual Instrument, or are they essentialy grouped as one giant plug-in (or I could have it completely wrong and all of the samples are brought up in a 3rd party plug-in sampler?)?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Madsen View Post
I think East West or VSL will be better for your needs. East West has a great, large Hollywood sound, but the Silver and Gold packages only have one mic setting available which has some embedded reverb. This can be a con when you're wanting to create intimate ensembles like string quartets. This is where VSL would serve you better, but just understand that you'll have to do a bit more processing to get a good sound. I also don't like the way VSL names their files- which makes the work flow a bit more cumbersome.

One thing you didn't mention is your budget. There is also Project SAM which is getting alot of attention and use by major composers for media. The top VSL package is around $20,000!! So what is your budget? This will help me give you some realistic options.

Nathan
The comment about East West mic placement options is exactly what I needed to hear. My first thought when listening to their demos was about control of ambiance. Does the Platinum bundle contain close-miced versions?

My budget is 2-4k, dependant on other factors. My curiosity is over whether I should grab a full bundle in that range, or alternatively be satisfied with a limited pallete of high-quality sounds (Vienna Symphonic strings, piano), and suffer the wrath of free GPO sounds from Finale.
My thought about going the limited pallete route, would be that upon the completion of string quartet and piano trio pieces, I could then uprade in increments, and by adding different sections, would learn more about the principles of orchestration in line with traditional pedagogy.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Aug 25 2008, 3:32 AM

QcCowboy's Avatar

Moderator
Group: Moderators
Joined: 27-April 06
Posts: 3,584
Member Number: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Lee Graham View Post
Hmmm... I wonder why Finale doesn't have the whole set, then? The "full" set of GPO could have everything but the kitchen sink, but if it won't play my score, then it's useless to me.
Because the "Finale edition" of GPO is a teaser of sorts.
Since GPO and most of the other Garritan products are so inexpensive, it would be counter-productive for the makers of GPO to include the "full" version of their product with sales of Finale, as a free add-on. Finale and GPO are made by two entirely different companies.

So they include a "teaser" version: the GPO for Finale library, which is a "light" version. Quite functional, but not as complete as the full product.

By the way, as a registered user of Finale, you get a discount on any future purchases of Garritan products if you do so via the MakeMusic website.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach
."
-Aristotle-

"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-

In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
Reply With Quote
 

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers