Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolas
Beethoven sonatas are usually unique opus, but small sonatinas were published together thus the op.15 no.1 op.15 No. 2 etc...
|
and the sonatas op.27 nos. 1 and 2. There are many more. (and when I say many I mean just a few

)
Anyways, to answer Ramone's question, I have 29 opera (I hope everybody here knows that is the plural of opus, you'd be surprised at the amount of people in our field of music that forget or never knew that) but as a list of ''completed'' works, it is inaccurate. I should probably go back and create a unique list for all my finished works and add to that when I ''finish'' a new work, but that will be a different list. When I officially
publish a work, I will call that Opus 1. Currently my list of
finished works looks like this:
Op.1 - Fantasia in C, "Spring Spirits" (solo piano)
Op.2 - Two 'Preludes' (solo piano)
- No.1 in G major "Trillium"
- No.2 in Ab major "The King's Courts"
Op.3 - Two Marches (solo piano)
- No.1 in B minor "Marche Espanole"
- No.2 in F# minor "Tanze Marziale"
Op.4 - String Quartet(ino) in G major (three movements)
Op.5 - Two Waltzes (solo piano)
- No.1 in G minor
- No.2 in C major
Op.6 - Six Rhapsodies for Concert Band
Op.7 - March and Minuet in F (two short pieces, solo piano)
Op.8 - Romanze in F# minor for String Quintet
Op.9 - Depictions of Persons Suite (orchestra, currently 14 completed movements)
Op.10 - Valse in G minor, ''Valse in Blue Notes''
Op.11 - ''Celeste'' for Concert Band (a standalone piece)
Op.12/1 - Duet for Two Bassoons (three movements)
Op.12/2 - Duet for Two Bassoons (a single movement)
Op.13 - Suite for Brass Choir
- I Coronation in Bb major
- II Todesmarsch in D minor
- III Der Erlkönig in D minor (unfinished/WIP)
Op.14 - "Reflections of New Years" for Three Violoncelli and Two Contrabassi
Op.15 - "Variations on John Brown's Body" for Horn and String Orchestra
In my signature there is a link to my profile and if you follow that you will come across a complete listing of all my works, finished and unfinished, and you can see all the works that I did NOT include in the list above, since they were either cruddy, or unfinished. My current opus list just shows the order I started writing pieces and if I started a couple a short time from each other, I might put them under the same opus. See Op.2, 3, 5, and 13 on the above list for examples. The Op.10 (above) was written a good bit later than Op.5, so I didn't bunch it together.
That's to answer the first question. To answer the second, 'what defines an opus'... I usually think of opus as a published work. However, the method I've been using in my own works is just "add one to the list when I start it, whether I finish it or not" and later adding a WoO. list and horribly confuzzling matters. What *I* think an opus should be, is a work that the composer is
proud of. Something he (she!) is willing to put in a list of works that will be put out into the public, listened to, and PLAYED. If you're embarrassed to include a work, you don't have to designate an opus, as simple as that. Surely, I do not think that using a numbering system is NECESSARY, but if you write a LOT of works it will help identify ones of similar types, like quartets and sonatas. However if you are a fan of programmatic names through and though, I don't really think there is a need for op. this op. that unless you want to preserve some sense of chronological order. (which is my personal aim)