Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Search   Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Upload Your Compositions for Analysis or Feedback > Piano Music, Solo Keyboard

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Jul 16 2008, 1:52 PM

Pianist & Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 24-December 07
Posts: 327
Member Number: 3983
Piano Prelude D Minor op.2

Third prelude of the 8 Piano Prelude series.

Midi:
8 Piano Preludes III D Minor op.2.MID
Score:
Finale 2008 - [8 Piano Preludes III D Minor op.pdf
Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Jul 17 2008, 7:53 AM

Abracadabra's Avatar

Earthling
Group: Members
Joined: 5-July 07
Posts: 368
Member Number: 3128
I like the simplicity of this piece. It sounds like it might be easy to play for a beginner. Owl have to give it a shot on the piano.

Nice work.

By the way, thanks for posting midi files. Being on dial-up those are easy for me to download.
__________________

Great Piano Practice Techniques:
http://members.aol.com/chang8825/entirebook.htm
Free online music theory lessons:
http://www.8notes.com/theory/
http://www.harmony.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Jul 17 2008, 7:01 PM

Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 9-July 08
Posts: 29
Member Number: 5080
I can't help but think this piece lacks in originality and that the first few bars have been taken from somewhere else. Is it just me or does anyone else think this?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Jul 17 2008, 8:29 PM

Pianist & Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 24-December 07
Posts: 327
Member Number: 3983
taken? well, i dont take, borrow or steal, sorry you are mistaken. lacks in orginality? im sorry can you be more specific?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Jul 17 2008, 8:56 PM

Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 9-July 08
Posts: 29
Member Number: 5080
Of course, you wouldn't purposely steal anybody else's work. That's called plagiarising and that's cheating and it's very very bad...

I'm not saying that you intended to take somebody else's work. I'm saying that you may have unconsciously written something from your head that is actually a work that you've heard from elsewhere. People get it all the time thinking that they've just experienced a stroke of genius and marvel at how a tune has just written itself out. I’m not completely certain that you have written something which is very similar to something else so that’s why I asked if anybody agrees with me. If not then it’s probably just me at fault.

Looking at your post count and just generally snooping around a bit I got the impression that you could do better than this piece. Maybe I was wrong to do so because I don’t know you, I’m new to this forum and I’ll admit that I haven’t heard much of your previous work. When I say that this particular piece lacks originality I mainly mean the harmony and its progression. I’ll admit another thing now too: I’m no expert on harmony. I’m completely self-taught in composition but I do believe that your chord progression in this piece lacks interest. I’m not saying that you should start being radical or whatever but it’s nice (even if you’re still learning) to try and vary the harmony a bit. Listen to lots of different music and listen to it’s chord progressions.

I know it’s easy to get offended when somebody accuses you of plagiarism. I didn’t intend to upset anyone (if you are upset).
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Jul 18 2008, 10:31 AM

Abracadabra's Avatar

Earthling
Group: Members
Joined: 5-July 07
Posts: 368
Member Number: 3128
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.J. OK! View Post
I'm not saying that you intended to take somebody else's work. I'm saying that you may have unconsciously written something from your head that is actually a work that you've heard from elsewhere.
I think it's almost impossible to write music anymore that doesn't sound vaguely familiar to something else. Especially if the piece is fairly simple.

This is a big thing that bothers me. Trying to come up with stuff that truly sounds original and still sounds good is a humongous task. I've always felt it to be a bit ironic that people always say, "Listen to lots of music!". Well duh? The more music you listen to the more likely you are to write something similar to what you've heard. Especially if you're doing it subconsciously.

This is a huge problem with songwriting I think. I try to write all my songs just off the top of my head, yet almost every song I write someone suggests that it sounds like some other song. It's truly difficult to come up with something that doesn't already sound like something else at least in some vague way.

~~~

I should add that it's especially difficult to do if you want it to sounds GOOD.

It's easy to write garbage that doesn't sound like anything else. That's probably because even if it had been written before no one wants to hear it. (ha ha)
__________________

Great Piano Practice Techniques:
http://members.aol.com/chang8825/entirebook.htm
Free online music theory lessons:
http://www.8notes.com/theory/
http://www.harmony.org.uk/

Last edited by Abracadabra : Jul 18 2008 at 10:35 AM. Reason: to add a comment.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Jul 18 2008, 10:52 AM

Pianist & Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 24-December 07
Posts: 327
Member Number: 3983
did you try it on the piano Abracadabra?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Jul 18 2008, 11:07 AM

Abracadabra's Avatar

Earthling
Group: Members
Joined: 5-July 07
Posts: 368
Member Number: 3128
Not yet, but I might try it today. I need to print out the PDF frist.

I might add to that I'm a terrible piano player! But this piece sounds like something that I might be able to play easily (at least in part anyway).

I'm truly an amature pianist who is also self-learned, by the way. I won't say 'self-taught' because I have sought out the advice of teachers in printed materials as well as video examples, etc.

Owl try to give it a shot this afternoon and see how it goes. Owl let you know.
__________________

Great Piano Practice Techniques:
http://members.aol.com/chang8825/entirebook.htm
Free online music theory lessons:
http://www.8notes.com/theory/
http://www.harmony.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Jul 18 2008, 11:53 AM

Pianist & Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 24-December 07
Posts: 327
Member Number: 3983
very nice , well i work as a piano part time piano teacher its not a hard piece, but i have not added any dynamics and few articulations, i want to give the pianist a chance to make his very own version of the piece, so to get it good you need a lot of musicality
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Jul 18 2008, 2:23 PM

Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 9-July 08
Posts: 29
Member Number: 5080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abracadabra View Post
I think it's almost impossible to write music anymore that doesn't sound vaguely familiar to something else. Especially if the piece is fairly simple.

This is a big thing that bothers me. Trying to come up with stuff that truly sounds original and still sounds good is a humongous task. I've always felt it to be a bit ironic that people always say, "Listen to lots of music!". Well duh? The more music you listen to the more likely you are to write something similar to what you've heard. Especially if you're doing it subconsciously.

This is a huge problem with songwriting I think. I try to write all my songs just off the top of my head, yet almost every song I write someone suggests that it sounds like some other song. It's truly difficult to come up with something that doesn't already sound like something else at least in some vague way.

~~~

I should add that it's especially difficult to do if you want it to sounds GOOD.

It's easy to write garbage that doesn't sound like anything else. That's probably because even if it had been written before no one wants to hear it. (ha ha)
So are you saying that it's fine to write music that sounds like someone else's work just because there's lots of music that has been composed before you?

I don't think that it's impossible to write music that is original. Being influenced by a composer and having echoes of somebody else's style is one thing, taking chunks of someone else's work is another. Now I'm not accusing SimenN of that (again, I’m not sure if he has copied anyone) but you're making some moot points here.

Whether a piece is simple or contains loads of complex orchestral layers has nothing to do with how easy it is to plagiarise. You can copy a passage from a symphony and you can copy a melody from a simple piano piece with similar ease. It's copying, what can be easier than that?

What is 'good'? Entirely subjective is what it is. 'Good' doesn't have to be diatonic scales with a perfect cadence at the end. We follow a system which has 12 notes and our ears have been trained to appreciate that. Those that have been trained to listen to other systems will find most Western music to be alien. What I'm basically saying is that 'good' music changes and perhaps you should try and free yourself from what you currently believe is 'good' music and try to find other forms of music which is pleasing.

Can't compose without using somebody else's tune? Try harder! You said it yourself, it's not easy! Do you think that innovation in music is dead? Did Bach know that at the end of the Classical era some dude called Beethoven was going to help transform music and help create the Romantic era? Did the people of previous eras sleep a little easier because they knew that there was still room for innovation in music? Forever people have and will think that they have reached a plateau but only because they aren't the ones who are going to take things into a new direction. There's a reason why those who do transform music (or anything in life) are called radicals and are slapped with the term 'genius'. It's because nobody else thought of what they thought before. Assuming that it's impossible to be original anymore is silly. Whether it's through evolution or a revolution, change will happen but of course we don't know how it's going to happen or what will happen (unless of course, you are one of the radicals but even then only retrospect can tell you this).

Oh, and listening to lot’s of different types of music? The idea is that you will be influenced by many styles and mix it all together to form your own style. If you only ever listened to Rachmaninoff then your music will sound like Rachmaninoff. If you listen to a dozen composers then hopefully you’ll sound like all 12 of them mixed together and that’s going to be more original, right?

Yep, it certainly is easy to write garbage. But, my friend, difficult is worth doing.
Reply With Quote
 

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 AM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers