Home  Articles   Profiles  Forum  Register  Notation Software  Lessons  Archives  Contact 
Register Board Rules Member List Member Map Password Recovery Search Today's Posts Mark All Forums As Read Calendar Library
Go Back   Young Composers Music Forum > Technological > Software and Hardware

Welcome to the Young Composers Music Forum. You are currently browsing as a guest - join today to post messages, upload music, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Reply

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Aug 11 2006, 9:29 PM

KiwiMuso's Avatar

Starving Musician
Group: Members
Joined: 1-August 06
Posts: 22
Member Number: 1193
Recently I've been thinking about getting some kind of midi sequencer. However I have very little knowledge of them and I'd like some help;

a) what sort of things can a midi sequencer do that Sibelus 4 (my current version) can't? Will it give me more flexibility?
b) Would you say that a midi sequencer is worth having in addition to Sibelius 4?

Answers would be much appreciated. Thanks!
__________________
"Huh! Rachmaninov...I bet he used all his fingers."
- Fran, Black Books
Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Aug 12 2006, 3:54 AM

Intermediate Composer
Group: Members
Joined: 3-November 05
Posts: 143
Member Number: 287
Hi KiwiMuso,

What you want to use really depends on the type of music you write and whether you write for the printed score or the actual audio recording.

If you're in it for the score, then you'd stick with Sibelius. Notation softwares are specifically made for the score. If you're not interested in having a realistic sounding audio output, then it's alright to stick with notation. It's not to say that Sibelius can't give you a realistic output, but the time you would expend on one project to make it sound realistic using notation is unimaginable. Simply because the inconvenience in the GUI of the software. Another disadvantage of using the notation is that notation is typically used for orchestral, piano, more classical (not meaning "era" but compared to modern/electric) instruments. Trying to write music for electric guitar, pop music, rock music might get a little awkward. Needless to say electronica, techno, or rhythmic music is out of the question.

If you're in it for the sound, then you're better off with sequencers because sequencers gives you control of the expression of each individual note accurately. That is, you get to control each note's velocity, volume, sustain, etc through (typically) a bar graph-like chart underneath a piano roll. Some notation softwares have improved to give similar features to allow adjusting of each individual notes expression but it's not as easily done as sequencers. Another advantage, in my experience, is that it's easier to change your music around because there are no rests to worry about. Sequencers can hook you up with a lot of VSTi or DXi effects as well as instruments for better sampling and dynamics. Although some notations have that feature now as well. The disadvantage of the sequencer is the poor score output. Often times what you expect from inputting in the piano roll dosn't give you the score you want.

Quote:
Will it give me more flexibility?
In my experience. Yes. It will give you more flexibility. But obviously a little more work required.

Quote:
Would you say that a midi sequencer is worth having in addition to Sibelius 4?
It certainly wouldn't hurt. A lot of big shot film composers out there use a combination of both sequencers and notation. I'm a sequencer user. I rarely require a score but when I do, I do have notation installed in those cases.


If you're not convinced enough. You can try out some free midi sequencers first. Like "Frieve Studio Producer" (google it up, Producer Edition is free, Independence is paid.) If you're looking into Steinberg Cubase, I don't really know any cheaper alternatives. But if you're looking into Cakewalk Studio, give Cakewalk Music Creator 3 a try. It's the exact same engine as Sonar except Cakewalk Music Creator 3 only costs about $30 whereas Sonar costs about $800. I find Cakewalk Music Creator 3 just as useful as Sonar. Sonar has way too many features not needed.

Hope that helps.
__________________
AMD 64 Athlon 3200, 250 GB HD, 2 X 512 MB Memory, GeForce 7600 GT
BenQ FP93G X 19" LCD, Sony MDR XD100 Headband Headphones, UBL Pro Speakers
Cakewalk Sonar, Various Sample Libraries, Nero Wave Editor
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Aug 12 2006, 8:51 AM

KiwiMuso's Avatar

Starving Musician
Group: Members
Joined: 1-August 06
Posts: 22
Member Number: 1193
Hey Beefybeef

Yeah, that certainly does help. I think it probably will be worth it to get some kind of midi sequencer too, since I'm quite interested in getting into electronic music (also means I get performed more ). I'll definately look into some of the ones that you mentioned - especially the free one!

Thanks a lot!
__________________
"Huh! Rachmaninov...I bet he used all his fingers."
- Fran, Black Books
Reply With Quote
 

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.

RSS

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Proprietary software and modifications Copyright ©2005 - 2008, Young Composers