|
I'm curious why you added that "vox" line.
As a choral part, it's (excuse me if this comes across as rude, but...) just one of the most boring vocal lines I've had the displeasure to come across!
I think that if you really want to be writing something "for chorus" you need to take that chorus for what it is - a mixed group of voices, which should be treated as independant lines. You're just treating it like some sort of cheap Casio keyboard part.
The opening flute part is really too low to be really effective with the heavy piano accompaniment. Add to that that the flute and piano are basically doubling each other, it doesn't make for the most interesting music.
I'd avoid those low Bs in the flute part. While flutes with the low B extension are becoming more common, the way you've approached those low notes is not the most effective nor ingratiating use of those low notes. It's what I like to call "flute mime". Some dude standing there holding a flute and pretending to play... 'cause you won't be hearing any of those notes anyways. They're too low.
On to notation: you REALLY need to do something about the rhythmic notation of the piece, which is all over the place. Regardless of what I might think of the music upon hearing it, seeing the score makes me want to give a failing mark to this piece.
__________________
"Those that know, do;
Those that understand, teach."
-Aristotle-
"toute audace engendrée par l'ignorance cesse d'être une audace et devient une maladresse"
-Debussy-
In musical criticism, when issues of craft and technical consideration are set aside, what remains is more subjective. However, until technical issues are dealt with, the subjective portion bears considerably less weight.
|