Symphonic Competition

Nico is right, realism is always much better than being overtly giving, and it would not be called "being a jerk."

Being a jerk would imply him saying something blatantly rude, not something that could be construed as such.... now the "nancy" comment might have been being a jerk...

Sorry on my part; my opinions are usually left better to myself.

Is the rule that no portion of the symphony may be started before the start of the competition related to ideas started during the decision process of what the competition would be, works in progress, or previous posted works in the forum?

If you have brief sketches and ideas for the lay-out of your symphony that you devised during the decision process, I think these should be admitted. If a piece is in progress and has been so for a few months (or years) these should only be accepted granted you post new material and not finished works (finished before the competition). And if pieces are previously completed and posted in this forum, they should not be allowed at all.

I think this makes it fair enough, and policing this matter should only be a matter of honor system, much as we police fraudulant works from being posted as well.

Nico- You are gifted enough to begin writing a fresh symphony much as we have the talent to do the same. All is fair that way.

Is the entering already closed? I wrote my yes for it before but I didn't see that i got added to the list. I don't wanna bug anyone too much...

Originally Posted by zentari

Sorry on my part; my opinions are usually left better to myself.

Everyones opinion matters man. If you don't want to say it because somone else will rip you down your being just a bit lazy . Your opinions are influenced by the outside world, and you gotta keep an open mind, looking stupid isn't thing once in a while as long as you learn from it.

I also think having somone who has a little less knowledge on how to judge is a good idea. They have a more fresh perspective and may notice things others may not because they have judged before so they might glance over things the NOOB(which is not a bad thing) may not. Wat do you guys say?
Also how can somone improve themselves at judging if they are not given the chance to? Hmmm?

I agree with the realistic thing too, but the point above is about that too.

Does the piece have to be a certain length or longer than x number of minutes?

Originally Posted by TheMeaningofLIfe

I also think having somone who has a little less knowledge on how to judge is a good idea. They have a more fresh perspective and may notice things others may not because they have judged before so they might glance over things the NOOB(which is not a bad thing) may not. Wat do you guys say?
Also how can somone improve themselves at judging if they are not given the chance to? Hmmm?
.

A fresh paridigm has nothing to do with knowledge or experience... But you still go places (sometimes) with your thoughts..

Originally Posted by William K.

Does the piece have to be a certain length or longer than x number of minutes?

There is no length requirement. But keep in mind all the things you must accomplish with the music - development, themes, variety, etc. Most symphonic movements are anywhere from 3 - 15 minutes!

So basically, if you write a 2-minute movement you better be the shit.

Well, if all you have to say in the piece fits within 2 minutes, then so be it....but yeah, there'd better be a LOT in those 2 minutes for you to win.

TheMeaningofLife. Shall I add you to the list of competitors?

Nico- You are gifted enough to begin writing a fresh symphony much as we have the talent to do the same. All is fair that way.

Thanks, but no. I'm not writing a new one. I will not submit movements 4 and 5 to the forum, and I will instead enter them in the competition. It is a symphonic MOVEMENT competition, the entire symphony doesn't have to be completed. I don't think it would be unfair that way at all.