Jump to content

mark styles

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


mark styles last won the day on November 15 2015

mark styles had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

16 Good

About mark styles

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 11/24/1948

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    New York, NY
  • Occupation
  • Interests
  • Favorite Composers
  • My Compositional Styles
    pop, lite jazz, ensemble
  • Notation Software/Sequencers
    Logic Pro, Synfire Pro
  • Instruments Played
    keyboards and computers

Recent Profile Visitors

2,773 profile views
  1. mark styles

    Ganypheus - Chelsea Bridge

    The Piano is amazing, great chords, voicings, melody - transitions etc. Like the bass too. Personally I think a lighter jazz feel/sound to the drums, fills, rides, not steady kick, might have worked better. but that is a choice for you to make. Or perhaps exaggerate the drums more - more outside the norm - to contrast with the smooth classic jazz piano. In any event, this is quite good. congratulations
  2. mark styles

    Cold Coffee (Smooth Jazz)

    I like the piece. Agree with Monarcheon's comments. Consider lightening up or entirely removing the compression.. Yes, I think the sax getting busier (or at least in some parts) would be helpful. There is such a mashup of styles now.. So often there is no real wrong /right anymore.. Keep exploring. I like what you're doing a lot.
  3. mark styles

    The Outer Realms

    Commentary The Outer Realms This loosely reflects ‘the outer realms of my mind/and the edges I don’t often go to’.. I’ve always allowed my mind to go any direction in my quest for musical creatine. Although with time - one needs to place different boundaries to prevent chaos. All the sounds are reflective of events or beliefs in my mind. They are like my ‘pet sounds’.. I am drawn to this combination of sounds for my sound palette. The piece reflects various moods, processes and motifs that have happened to me. I spend time on the Ringo Starr drum/orchestral percussion fills; rather than rely on on steady drumming. The use of only fills allows me to include more musical matter without the piece getting too dense. I again used various, sound rooms, halls or no reverb, or room acoustics. I wanted different instruments to be coming from different environments. I realize too often in conventional music I get ‘stuck’ on the sound of the hall, or reverb that was used. To me, it often overpowers or dilutes the emotion of the notes of various instruments. I also feel the different acoustic environments on different instruments, adds to the quality of the piece in that it is ‘un-natural’ although concsciously most listeners will not be aware of it. I feel it also adds to the impact of different unanticipated sounds, instruments, thus setting up the listener’s mind for something different. Like most of my pieces lately.. I start with a chord progression, generally a generic piano chording track. working on pacing, complexity of chords etc, As piece evolves, I sometimes used chord substitutions,/more complex forms of chord, so the piece doesn’t have clear repeatable sections . As I create the piece, I take the chord track out, other instruments play notes that alter what the original chord would have been.. I develop melodies, motifs, and harmonies, sometimes altering, what the original chords were, or making them more complex. Some of the tracks don’t have a real ‘pitch center’s or are complex UVI or Kontakt libraries, with arpeggios or built ing sequences (some quite subtle). So these are notated on bottom of staff as a percussion type instrument. Logic’s pitch detection, can’t isolate these notes accurately, nor do I have perfect pitch - so i don’t have accurate notes for these tracks. Besides a piece needs some mystery to it. Although this piece has more of a ‘jam’ quality to it, some instruments get to stretch out and improvise, etc. I am not concerned with tradition structural forms at this point. So it is a musical ‘landscape’ piece’. one might say. I enjoy the meandering and exploring nature, rather than predictable musical devices. I was discussing with a fellow artist, my age, how he sometimes being new and creative hard. He feels confined by all the musical rules and processes he knows, and it get’s hard to ‘think outside the box’. I notice in my life, how my thinking gravitates towards, rigidity and rules, in all aspects of life, rather than blindly experiment with the unknown - which was a frequent technique I used in my youth. Piece is 9:35 - so sit down, relax..
  4. mark styles

    Lydian Fugue

    The Lydian mode to me, is kind of like eating an artichoke. The first two leaves, a weird, and slightly unpleasant, but once you palate gets used to taste, it is quite palatable. A good job.
  5. mark styles

    What's wrong with my music?

    My comment would be to maybe try a bit of variation in the main melody riff as the piece progresses. I liked your transitions a lot. All in all it is good.. I think all of us, at some points, hear things in or work we don't like.. John Lennon said once, if he had the opportunity, he would like to re-record 3/4 of the music they did to make it better. The main thing is to listen to others music take note of things you like and might incorporate into your work. I wouldn't say there is anything in your piece that is really wrong
  6. mark styles

    The Coastal Zone

    Hi Hughes: Thanks for the observations. I am not sure why, but I have started using a large amount of instruments in the last 3 years. I never used to before, I have been thinking about the psychological impact of music on the listener. different instruments, coming and going.with their particular filtering, resonance, harmonics involved. I like creating a landscape of sound, with some natural real instruments, mixed in with artificial instruments. sometimes using sound design. Different instruments, have different acoustical space their playing in. This has a subtle subconscious impact on the listener. In the 60's I played in a number of rock bands, I also got quite serious about writing songs. I got some 2nd instruments, so I could play guitar, bass, drums on songs. In the 70's I got heavily involved in analog modular synthesizers, You could constant creating this totally un-natural sounds, that could only exist because of the synthesizer itself. This was the start of me looking at alternatives. For quite a while I did music with only synthesizers. With time I realized; it was good to use some standard real instruments. This made it more comfortable for the brain to relate to music. So I used real sample libraries, and also artificial instruments. I like the surprise and psychological impact of a large number of instruments. Good music is careful balance of repetition, and change. We need the repetition to develop something stable we can latch onto. We need change so the brain doesn't get bored. So I will sometimes take a motif, and then have another instrument take it up, but make some changes. So hopefully, I have just enough 'continuity' for something the brain can 'figure out' and latch onto' but enough surprise, to engage the brain to pay attention. Often with music or anything, once the brain has figured out the pattern of something, it can become complacent. So I like the challenge of finding the right balance, of continuity, via melody, collection of a couple of instruments, which kind of 'ground' the piece, but also the constant change of new sounds, mutation of musical melody, to keep challenging the brain. I had read years ago, that Prince used the technique, of constantly re-doing each part, He would record the song, Then re-do the bass part, with changes, then re-do the guitar part to complement the new bass. Then the piano etc. He would sometimes go through this cycle several times. Often the end result was substantial different than the first rendition. I have started doing the same, As I re-do a part, I re-do another instrument, so that is playing along, and paying attention to the previous instrument. I do spend a substantial amount of time on each piece. I will often sit back, lie down, even sleep, while the music loops. I find after 50 listens, I might decide a part i liked, is no longer acceptable. I have received similar comments about the number of parts. It's something I want/need to work thru. Yes some listeners, may find it too 'meandering' or confusing with all the parts, coming/going. I've been playing music for a very long time (60 years now - I can't believe it).. I took lessons and classes along the way. But I am a LOT self-taught. I've done a lot of different genres through the years. About 15 years ago. I decided to stop working on commercial music jobs (did it my whole life) And only do music I liked, and occasionally with singers I liked. So I could dedicate my time to pursue, what interested me.
  7. mark styles

    The Coastal Zone

    Oh thanx for the coment on bass lines.. I work on them quite a bit.. To me they are sometimes the most fun to create. And the use of space (not hitting the note) can be more effective, than hitting the note. As a kid I played a cheap bass on my own home recordings.. With the Beatles, after the first 3 albums. McCartney would often add his bass, as an overdub, after most of tracks were added. So the melody, and additional parts, would impact his playing. His bass playing became more melodic.. and kind of started a new school of bass playing.. Later other bass players, really took bass playing to new heights (or depths). They sometimes would bear as much weight, as perhaps a lead guitar. Music is amazing, in how one can interpret, and create something new
  8. mark styles

    Never In A Million Years

    You want to learn the characteristics of your speakers and the room you mix in.. Most often, it's a combination of both, which mislead you. One trick would be to play (or load into two tracks of your DAW song) a CD or high quality commercial mix of a band which you like or is similar to the type of material you are using. Then you can A/B between your mix and a commercially recorded mix. Use volume and EQ to match.. Typically a lot of home studios, are not acoustically even.. So one compensates, by adding bass, so it sounds good. However when played on other systems, the bass EQ of mix is overbearing.. Get a decent set of headphones. check you mix on that. Play your mixes on other speakers, or systems, to check sound balance. I-Phone, boombox, etc. Try to ignore the music and just listen to the mix/balance of frequencies in the music. As you get more into it, you will get better adjusting individual instrument levels, and EQ's. You can also roll off the low end of some instruments. I often roll off the bottom of acoustic and electric guitars, so it doesn't mask the bass part. Check online. There are plenty of websites, where home speaker tips are available.. Room treatment, baffles, acoustic foam, can help greatly. I use some acoustic foam to absorb hi end frequencies.. instead of baffles to soak up low speaker sound waves. I found some 'Theatre curtains'. They are 3 layered, with a thicker sound absorbing material between the front and back. Read up on sound acoustics. If you place your speakers too close to a wall, they can greatly affect the sound of your room. Buy the best speaker monitors you can afford. I bought some Genelec 8040 A's and Grado headphones. Both high quality. Google for articles about studio monitors.. There are certainly decent, reasonably priced set-ups.. Back in the 70's when I was much younger, i worked in a 24 track studio in Boston.. I used to play David Bowies's 'Young Americans' because I loved the sound.. I would play the song, then mix in my kick drum, EQ and set level to 'fit' into song, then the snare, then the bass guitar, etc. Even if the songs were in different keys, or BPM's you could still get the EQ's right.. Patch commercial recordings into your set-up and listen carefully to how it sounds, check out different genre's of music. Sometimes is easier to put a final MIX plug-in on the master output. I use Logic, (I assume all other DAWS would have similar plug-in chains) i also use Steven Slate XG plug-in, or Isotope 8. They are very good mastering plug-ins. Once you understand the characteristics of your room/speaker set-up, you can compensate. It takes time, and with experience, you begin to 'attune' your ears, to notice much more. There is a LOT to learn about creating good music.. That is why in the old days, there were song writers, arrangers, recording engineers, producers, a separate/different mastering process. With DAWS. that can all become the job of on person. Be patient. It's fun, and you can learn a lot. I was plagued by too much low end on my songs a number of years ago. While visiting a new friend. I checked out his set-up.. I upgraded to Mackie HR, and then later to the Genelecs. I am not saying you have to have expensive speakers to make good music. Indeed in the last few years, smaller cheaper speakers have much improved bass response..
  9. mark styles

    Never In A Million Years

    I couldn't play the song, I had to download it. Normally at Box (which I have an account at too. One can go to the link and play it. I'm on a mac laptop with Safari 10.1.1 Yeah I would check into why some people have to download it. I love the Beatles, so I really enjoyed your piece. Keep up the good work.
  10. mark styles

    The Myth Of Originality?

    So much music has been made, and is readily available, it's pretty hard to come up with something completely new.. Write what comes out.. don't worry about 'being totally original'... cause you really can't.. The music part of our brain, is full of data, rules, what sounds good, scales, melodic forms it likes etc.. It takes all that's stored in it, and something comes out. Sometimes, it feels like music comes 'thru' us and we are only the conduit.. When Paul McCartney first wrote 'Yesterday' (it was called Scrambled Eggs). He said the melody came to him as a fragment from a dream.. He walked around for a week or two, playing it for everyone he knew, being pretty sure at the time, it was something he heard from someone else, and not totally his own. When he was satisfied no one knew what it was, then he felt it was his own.. After you've got a concept out with your creative 'subjective' brain.. Be analytical about it, did you steal something.. Or are you just using a compositional tool, other composers have used.. Sometimes I just jam a melodic part out.. Than cut/paste/move segments around, until it sounds unique, and not like a melody I would commonly write.. Being 67 and very versed in popular music (I took music lessons from 30's - 60's fake books).. I can hear so much borrowing, stealing, manipulation of something old, outright copyright infringement. I sometimes think if I was a music lawyer, I could make a living on music copyright infringement alone.. A lot of cable stations, cater their commercials to cities, even segments of the population, so a fair amount of these commercials are 'home made' by younger musicians.. I've heard popular music songs, just barely altered and used as original music. (I used to compose for OmniMusic Library). Back in the 90's I had to do 16 songs in 3 weeks.. I bought and used Band in a box.. to speed up the process. It's a clever piece of software.. But once you use it enough you start to recognize chord progressions and melodic segments it uses. Imagine my surprise to hear a moderate amount of generic music used in commercials, industrial soundtracks, that I knew the original ideas came from Band in a Box.. Write what you like.. if you feel like you 'regurgitating' someone else's music it's OK.. You got to get it out of your system, then sub-consciously you will move on.. Since so much (all?) classical music is public domain, don't worry about it. good luck, keep making music.
  11. It is good to develop your own style. A composers style will/should evolve evolve, that is part of human nature. otherwise you become stagnant.. It is also wise to extend your composition style because music evolves.. I like comparing movie scores from now and from the 80's.. While all these libraries, in Kontakt format, (and others) are great.. It really just too many of todays scores, pretty much sound like everybody elses. That is the price we pay, because the price of creating a movie score, and hiring a real orchestrall is just too expensive.. A have a music libary junkie friend.. He buys every library he can...And while the scope of music has expanded; it really doesn't sound 'personal' anymore.. From a business standpoint, the wider the scope of your music, the more jobs you will be elegible to get the jobs..
  12. I used to send in 'a collection' of songs via CD to blanket copyright a lot of material at one time.. MY interpretation of the Copyright Website was only one song could be copy written electronically.. The problem with snail mail. is it takes an eternity, the copyright is dated when you mailed the package.. I once tried to copyright a song (written by 3 people).. Well they cashed my check and then took a year to tell me, my copyright wasn't valid, caused I used the wrong application.
  13. I HATE the fact you must sign into Google to see a score someone printed.. Google is constantly trying to monitor exactly where you browse.. Then a few days later you start getting related spam emails.. Please drop the Google sign in to see a score.
  14. I'm having trouble with the mp3 player.. Something like the buffers are wrong.. I played several pieces from different people, I get a regular 'tick' like every second. This never happened before.. Things always change, seeing the site look different kind of threw me.. I liked the old look better.. I'll get used to it..
  15. It's going to take more than ten days... You might also consider taking 2 or three of your motifs, and making variations of them, and place them later in the piece.. After you've accumulated and hour of music, comes the work of segueing them.. You will/should try many variations of the order of the pieces.. Some pieces sound better when they precede or follow another piece.. You don't want to have too many similar ideas strung together (or perhaps your do). Many artists spend weeks on queing the songs in different orders, and listening to the emotional inpact of them.. Just as a song makes a statement, reiterates it, then a variation, then some kind of bridge to shift your focus and then back to original idea.. You also need to do that with the order of your songs. Learn by doing.. You can listen to the growth of almost any artist, how they got into a certain genre, where they finally settled, or the artists who made it a point to never repeat themselves. Think of how a movie develops, how the scenes lead up to the important idea. How after that you have to come down gently, and then move on again. Also think of it as journey through the country side.. You as the composer off up interesting sites to the customer.. Yet you have some continuity.. You have a home base, which comes around.. In the early 60's, it wasn't unheard of for an artist who would take the chords of his previous hit record and put new melody and lyrics, theses usually didn't work, but occassionally did.. Once in a while you even heard the same piece of music with a new artist and song singing over it. They were hoping the familiarty of the originial piece would catapult the new song into top of the charts. Indeed there are any number of songs that use the same chords (they can't be copy written).. The familiarity of the chords, strikes a sympethetic string with the listener, The Beatles last album features a 20 minute medley most of pieces of songs they never finished. They rewrote some lyrics to hint at a song coming later.. George Martine told them to 'pepper' the album, with their motifs, that made them popular.. You here a lot of 'yeah yeah yeahs, and other titdbits from old songs. Glass Onion reiterates on a number of earlier Beatles songs, they even took the flute part from Fool on the Hill, and kind of twisted it to fit into this new song.. It almost mocks Paul's original song.. Just like an embroidery you have areas that are duplicated, you have areas that are different.. You need continuitinuty to keep listener's grounded, so the music just sound like a free from nothing song. You need variety to re-s spark the listeners attention, then you need to go back to original motif, to make the listen feel comfortable (something he can count on). The great thing about computers and music is; it's easy to make variations, yet quickly retrieve a previous idea.. Quite often I experiment on a song a lot, sometimes ending up with something very different than what i started with. Then the moment of inspiration sparks.. and I splice/edit in a variation from two weeks ago.. In the old days 70s. You had to do all these takes on different pieces of tape. Then you needed a brave experienced engineer, to cut the two inch tape with a razor blade and edit them together. (there were no computer generated clocks then) and not that many artists used the idea of recording 4 bars of a metronone so they got the exact same tempo. All the while you do this, you should be having fun.. Keep doing what you're doing, and you'll meet up with someone who will want to work with you. Draw up a simple agreement, so it's clear what each of you are doing, and responsible for.. I had a friend years ago, who miracously got Eric Clapton to play guitar on his song,. Well the keyboard/ engineer, got greedy and claimed he should receive 80% of the credit, since he came up with a few chords, and he engineered the song in his studio.. My friend came to me. Gave me only a track with Clapton's guitar, and I build an entirely new song with different chords, so we could bypass the greedy bastard who wanted all the credit. Remember sometimes you are paying/bartering with someone for recording/engineering time.. It's a tricky situation when members start contributing their parts, because then they become composers too. Keep putting your ideas out, make some you tube videos, even a simple panning of static images, to get others to hear your work.. I have no doubt you will find sone one interested, but there will had to be concessions made on both parts. That is part of the fun of music. I've also worked with session singers, who charge a lot of money, come in do what they're told, then they leave.. That is a work for hire. The piece is still yours, but this must be stated and signed. Finding people on the same exact page as you and will to do it for the fun of it, is hard to come bye.. But the people are there. You've started on a never ending journey, enjoy the trip with it's ups/downs, detours and triumphs. Good luck, I have no doubts, that you will make much progress.