Jump to content


Old Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


NRKulus last won the day on April 17 2018

NRKulus had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

24 Excellent

About NRKulus

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Biography
    I was semi-active on this forum a long time ago; now I resurface occasionally to see what's new.
  • Gender
  • Location
  • Occupation
    I have several part-time jobs, most of which relate to music. I like it that way.
  • Favorite Composers
    Samuel Barber, John Adams, Mahler, Britten, Ravel, Charles Ives, Sibelius
  • My Compositional Styles
    Neo-Romantic, Neo-Impressionist, Americana, Pseudo-Soundtrack, Crazy Modern Music (occasionally)

Recent Profile Visitors

2,254 profile views
  1. I updated the piece today. I smoothed over some of the transitions and cleaned up a couple of parts that seemed a little repetitive. Hopefully the result is more professional-sounding!
  2. A local chamber orchestra was accepting scores from local composers, so I decided to write a piece vaguely related to some local folklore. It was fun! It's also in a loose sonata form. I don't usually bother writing in textbook forms like this, but my vague inspiration for the piece fit nicely into sonata form (the two themes relate to two different aspects of the lake--the mystery of the monster legend and the beauty of its surroundings). Following a prescribed form also allowed me to finish the piece quickly, and still allowed a good deal of creative freedom. Even though it's only for 14 instruments ( quintet), I found I was able to get a lot more colour out of this group than out of a full wind ensemble in another recent piece... those strings are just so darn versatile. I'm generally happy with the orchestration in this one. But there are still some transitions near the end that bother me a little. Do they bother you? UPDATED Dec. 24 -- fixed some repetitive/boring sections and smoothed over a transition or two. Anyway, hope you enjoy it! https://issuu.com/nicholasryankelly/docs/watermarked_thelegendofokanaganlake
  3. Thanks, Stewboy! The specific bar numbers you gave are especially helpful--thanks for sharing your perspective. I love John Mackey's percussion writing in 'Aurora Awakes' (although if I wrote for band with a 10 percussionists at this stage in my career, nobody would play it!) And it's a good point: vibraphone and marimba generally blend a lot better and have a less piercing tone than glockenspiel, which is why they can work for extended passages. I've even seen composers use marimba rolls as sort of a substitute for a whole tremolo string section... although this only works when the rest of the band is scored thinly and quietly, of course!
  4. Thanks, Monarcheon! I get what you mean about the overall range being static. I think that's a result of this being hastily arranged from a choral piece rather than the way I learned orchestration; nonetheless, your point is well taken.
  5. Here's a band piece I recently wrote. I originally conceived it as a choral piece based on my own words, but I decided the words were bad and the music might work better without them. The beginning has a bit of that familiar "choral piece transcribed for band" feel, but starting about 30 seconds in, I begin to develop the material in more instrumental ways. I've accepted the fact that wind bands aren't always capable of the same nuances of colour as orchestras--especially in softer, more delicate sections. So the composition itself--as well as the orchestration--is a bit simpler than it might be if I had written this for orchestra. But I hope it's still effective. I'd especially like feedback on the orchestration. Are the contrasts interesting and frequent enough? Does the frequent use of glockenspiel and triangle get annoying or overbearing? P.S. - The sounds are Vienna Symphonic Library - just the basic Special Edition set. SCORE AND AUDIO
  6. I'm sure I'm not the only person who has enjoyed listening to/score reading this piece, but was too intimidated by its length to comment. I didn't get through the whole thing due to time constraints, but here are my thoughts so far: It's quite an accomplishment. The balance between traditional tonality and recurring interval patterns is effective, and gives the piece a unique, consistent sound even when you're exploring all these different styles. The orchestration is also well done--you get a lot of colours and textures out of a fairly small group. And the scoring mostly looks nicely balanced--I think the MIDI gives a fairly accurate idea of of the textural balance (if not the blend or expressiveness) of a live performance. I think the piece's greatest strength might also be its greatest weakness: your transitions are lovely, and feel just right in their small-scale context. But on the large scale, I felt like there were too many of them. After the first few pages, you seldom go more than 5 or 6 measures without a fairly major change in texture and rhythmic surface. On the small scale, this fits your program nicely: the viola as a traveler guiding us through different (textural) areas. But after a while, this makes the form hard to follow--there aren't enough big arrivals or extended ideas (something that feels like the "meat" of the movement or section, if that makes sense) to contrast the almost constant transitions. This could be remedied with just the occasional longer section with an extended rhythmic ostinato or stable harmonic rhythm, among other things. Really, though, this piece is full of wonderful ideas. I'm looking forward to what you come up with next.
  7. As a general rule, whenever you post a MIDI recording, it's good to have a score to go along with it. This is especially true with vocal music--we need to know what the words are! Do you have a score you can post? From what I listened to, I think it's nice. It's a good imitation of the German romantic style (with a bit of classical thrown in) and you clearly know your traditional harmony and melodic composition. The orchestral writing also seemed to work well, although I'd have to see a score to know for sure, since MIDI can be misleading. My best advice for the next piece is just to listen to (and, if you can, look at scores) to lots of music from different places and time periods (including 20th/21st century)--and don't be afraid to "borrow" things you like from it in your own compositions. Over time, this can help you develop a more distinct, original sound.
  8. Thanks, Mark! I don't know if my music has been called "profound" before. Do you think the ending fits with the rest of the piece?
  9. Thanks, pateceramics--it's definitely helpful to know your reasoning behind what you did. I think the 6/4 chord at the end definitely makes sense in terms of the text painting you describe. I think the intent behind your text painting is great--my suggestion (to clarify) is that you could do it in a way that's more consistent with the rest of the piece's "sound world"--since having too many different styles and harmonic ideas in a short piece can get overwhelming to the listener. I had a composition teacher who said it's best to limit yourself to 2 (or at most 3) different types of chord (e.g. triadic, extended tertian, clusters, etc.) in a short piece. Obviously there are a lot of exceptions to this, but keeping it in the back of your mind can help achieve a little more stylistic consistency. And tritones are great! My suggestion has more to do with being careful about where you use them in structuring your phrases. In case it wasn't clear, I really like the piece! I hope you keep up the good work with polyphony and text painting, and post it here if you manage to get a live recording. Cheers!
  10. Well, I updated the file with less reverb... hopefully some of it is a little easier to follow now! I also added more dynamic contrast to the recording in the first section so that maybe the phrase shapes will be easier to hear. (apocryphal conversation between Elliot Carter and someone who was performing his music: INSTRUMENTALIST: The problem with your music is that if you take away the dynamics, the music doesn't make sense! CARTER: Yes; that's why you're supposed to PLAY the dynamics. I realized this piece is also probably much easier to understand with more dynamic contrast and phrase shaping in the recording... but that's [hopefully] where the similarity to Elliot Carter ends!)
  11. I really appreciate the polyphonic writing here. So much a cappella music published today is almost completely homophonic, so it's refreshing to see a piece that has nice melodies to sing in each part and some give and take between the different voices. I think it would be more effective if you treated dissonances with more care. When you're writing in a tonal context like this, with relatively smooth voice leading, it really sticks out to my ear (and not in a good way) when an unharmonized tritone suddenly arises in the middle of a phrase, with no obvious relation to the musical drama (this happened a few times, but it struck me the most at the end of m. 13, probably because of the parallel octaves). I think you could use these striking dissonances more to your advantage if you save them for important points in the phrase (e.g. dramatic high points, cadences, etc.) where their harshness could enhance the flow of the music rather than (to my ear) undermine it. The same could be said for accidentals--in a piece that's almost entirely diatonic, the few notes from outside the key will stand out, so they should be there for a reason. And I think some of them are (I really like the E-flat on "anima"), but I think others create harmonies that don't really fit in the context of the piece and are unnecessarily difficult to sing. For example, the alto part would be much easier if the last note of m. 29 were an A rather than a B-flat, and to my ear the B-flat is pretty unnecessary to the harmony anyway. Same thing in m. 40--I think the B-flat in the alto against the B-natural in the bass creates a sound that doesn't really fit with the rest of the piece. Personally, I'd just change the first two alto notes to Gs in that measure--you'd have a nice C-minor/A half-diminished chord on the first two beats, which would be much easier to sing in tune and more characteristic of this piece's overall sound. Polyphonic music like this can be easier for the listener to follow if each phrase has a clear direction to it (e.g. building toward a cadence, winding down from a climactic point, etc). There were just a few spots in this piece where I lost sense of this direction. For example, in the top line of page 5, you have an increase in dynamics from mf to f and have some nice ascending lines, but any sense of building intensity there is undercut by the fact that the texture is getting thinner (moving from 4 voices to 3, really 2 since the tenor and bass move into unison). A really little thing, but I'm curious why you ended on a 2nd-inversion chord. Root position would have a nicer sense of finality, and finally giving the basses a low G might give them a small--but satisfying--chance to show off, since they've been in the middle-to-high range for most of the piece.
  12. I think there are a lot of good ideas here, and the voice leading and melodic shaping are generally good. I also think you captured the atmosphere of the words very well (is there a story here? Who is the lyricist?) However, when you're writing a piece this long, it's always difficult to find the right balance between repetition and contrast to keep listeners engaged for 10 minutes... and for me, there was a little too much contrast (at least as far as melodic/motivic material is concerned). Apart from the minor chords with 9ths that keep coming back with longer rests between them, are there other musical ideas that come back in different parts of the piece to help unify the whole? To me, every section sounded kind of self-contained--new ideas kept being introduced and then abandoned. Maybe this wouldn't have bothered me as much if each section were well-developed, but you seemed to give up on a lot of your ideas prematurely. For example, I really liked the music at letter C in the score, but I was disappointed when it ended after 8 measures, and its contrapuntal richness and melodic ideas never came back. I understand you may have felt the need to end it after 8 bars because of the words, but you can always repeat text to make the section longer--or at least bring the idea back later in the piece to develop it more fully. Do you know the Hymn to St. Cecilia by Britten? It's a similar length, and takes a similar approach to form as you do (a few self-contained sections with a recurring refrain between them), but each section is several minutes long and thoroughly develops a single idea--the music doesn't move on from each idea until it's absolutely ready. It might be a good score to study when you're writing this kind of music (though it's not in the Public Domain yet, unfortunately). You might also try building more large-scale momentum and continuity (always important in a piece this length) by varying the harmonic rhythm more gradually--e.g. introduce faster chord changes little by little, instead of having an entire section that's essentially a single chord, abruptly followed by a section where the harmony changes every 2 beats. Something to keep in mind for the next piece, at least. I think I wouldn't have written such a long review if I didn't see a lot of potential in this piece... so good work.
  13. Thanks! I can indeed adjust the reverb, so maybe I'll try that... the thing with these virtual choir sounds is, they sound pretty choppy and robotic without lots of reverb, so it's a matter of finding the right balance. I also think these sound libraries tend to work better for more homophonic textures, so sometimes in more complex, polyphonic pieces like this one, they can be a little hard to follow. But I still stand by my "better-than-MIDI" comments!
  14. Hi! I don't post here much anymore, but I have a piece that I'm a little unsure about and would like some feedback on. The words are by H.P. Lovecraft (the weird uncle of modern horror fiction)--please have a listen and let me know if anything sticks out at you. The recording was made with Virharmonic Voices of Prague software so, while it's better than a MIDI, it's still not a substitute for a live performance (i.e. you'll still have to read the score and use a little imagination while listening). Score and audio are both in this video Thanks!
  • Create New...