Jump to content

celloman99

Members
  • Content Count

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

celloman99 last won the day on December 24 2018

celloman99 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

15 Good

1 Follower

About celloman99

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Biography
    I began inventing my own music as soon as I started taking piano lessons at age eight. I tried many times during those first years to write down what I was coming up with, but I never could get the hang of it. Several years later, when I was fourteen, I began arranging music for my church's wind and string ensemble. I found that I was finally able to properly notate my musical ideas, and I've been composing and arranging ever since. I have been fortunate enough to be involved in several different ensembles which kindly play, and often times perform, my music, so I have quite a bit of experience with knowing how my compositions sound when played by live musicians. I am constantly trying to improve my technique and find creative ways to express ideas through music.
    Instagram: music_inventor
  • Gender
    Male
  • Favorite Composers
    Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Stravinksy, Elgar
  • My Compositional Styles
    Classical, Modern
  • Notation Software/Sequencers
    Finale PrintMusic 2014
  • Instruments Played
    Piano, Cello, Guitar, Ukulele, Recorder

Recent Profile Visitors

1,852 profile views
  1. Hey gang, I posted this piece earlier when I was in the middle of writing it. Here is the finished product. This is the piece I composed over the spring semester during my first semester of composition lessons at the university I am attending. Please enjoy and let me know what you think! (P.S. Evidently when you use Petrucci font in Finale, the tremolo stops working, so that's why it appears in the score, but is not in the MP3 [do the midi problems ever end...?])
  2. J. Lee Graham, 1. Very pretty first movement - there was a lot of pleasant moments which I think would make the listener enjoy the piece a lot and stay focused as they wait for those moments to be repeated. 2. Your writing here is quite nice, and easy on the ears. Something you might consider is to expand what's going on past a sort of "everyone doing everything together at the same time" mentality. I'm not saying that's how it was the complete time; for instance, at M. 37- you have the first viola doing a nice suspended rhythm thing over the bar lines. I think this movement could benefit from more such polyrhythmic writing. There certainly is nothing wrong with what you have, I just think it could be a bit more rhythmically developed. 3. You establish a very nice sound straight from the beginning, and I can't imagine anyone not being completely charmed by this movement in a performance. Some of your harmonies are really pretty, and you put a lot of work into the articulation. The trio section provides a nice legato contrast. This is overall a very nice, tight movement. I may be wrong, but I feel like it has the most clearly defined structure. 4. Right off the bat, I am concerned about the runs at places like 34 and 37. I am a cellist and just looking at that, at the tempo the recording is at, is giving me a little bit of a heart attack! I am not the world's greatest cellist though, so perhaps who you are planning on this being performed by will be able to do it. I would just be aware that it is a little bit complicated to play those types of runs so fast on stringed instruments. It can be done, it just increases the difficulty of the piece by quite a bit. As far as the movement goes, there seems to be a lot more going on harmonically here than in the other three...? I'm not really sure, but that's just what my ear is picking up. It's not necessarily a bad thing, just something to consider. Also, just to be clear, figures like at 348 with the repeated 16th notes are very playable, it's the longer runs as I listed before that cause my concern. Summary: I think what you've got here is a very enjoyable, very pleasant piece which would be a lot of fun to hear live. I think that even though you are composing in a very classical style, you could experiment a bit more with rhythm/harmony, however there were some nice moments where you did that, so I am inclined to think that you are very capable of it but perhaps decided not to for this particular piece. In any case, I enjoyed listening to it and hope you get some people to play it sometime!
  3. Hey there, Here is another piece which I have been working on this semester! I really need to come up with a fun title, so if anyone has any ideas, please share! Also, I am happy to hear any comments on this work. It is in four movements, and I hope that you enjoy each of them (my personal favorite is the third one - 'Largo').
  4. Guten Tag! This is one of the projects I have been working on this semester! Feel free to check out the concept behind it at this blog post: Composition Notebook: "Morning Birds" - the story. What I am attaching for ya'll is the full score (which includes the cues for the three different flute parts, but not the actual parts), one of the flute parts (so you can see what they look like), a MIDI rendering of all the orchestra and flute parts combined, and a MIDI rendering of just the orchestra part (Titled "Three Violin Version..."). One of the flaws of the combined MIDI file is that the flute parts are made up of several short fragments/'bird calls',as you will see in the attached flute part, and the players will be improvising which bird call they play when. In other words, it will be a much more organic process than a computer just playing them all in order, as happens in the recording. I think the MP3 of everything combined sounds pretty terrible and clamorous which is not at all the intent of the piece. I suspect that this chaos will be lessened considerably when real players are performing this. If anyone has experience writing this sort of thing, I would really appreciate any advice you'd have to offer. Also, I am happy to hear comments from anyone about this piece, whether they be about the orchestral writing, the special effects, or anything else. Thank you and enjoy!
  5. @pateceramics Thanks so much for all of these great suggestions! You are right that no matter how hard you work on the score, you learn a ton at the live rehearsals! I will definitely take your suggestions under consideration. I really appreciate you listening and giving such a detailed response. Thanks!!
  6. @Rabbival507 You are right that it’s a long piece to listen to and review. May I suggest that you simply select a few sections from it to review instead?
  7. Hey folks, This is my latest composition, Ruth. It will be performed by my church's orchestra sometime in the Spring or Summer. I am looking for feedback on this so hit me with anything you've got! I know each section is pretty short, but it's what I had to do in order to fit the type of concert it will be performed at. Thanks! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c3YJdnU_Lg
  8. Awesome! This was a lot of fun to listen to! Congrats on getting it performed by such great musicians. It sounds great.
  9. Really great piece! I think a whole concert program with different instruments performing short pieces like this would be really cool.
  10. Hey there, This sounds really great! The orchestration is quite nice to listen to, and the overall effect of the piece is very nice. Your orchestration skills are far above mine, so I have no critiques. I think that the overall tone-color that you achieve is really pretty and easy to listen to. Good job!
  11. Hey guys, sorry for not posting recently. I've just moved to start going to school for organ performance, but I've been getting back into composing over the past weeks. Here's a project I've started and finished during that time.
  12. @dbzfreak2 Really cool piece! I am so happy that my composition inspired you, thanks for the mention!
  13. Awesome competition idea! I would like to enter.
×
×
  • Create New...