Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

1 Follower

About edfgi234

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

1,091 profile views
  1. I enjoyed this a lot. The range of ideas kept it very interesting throughout. I was a bit surprised at the start when after the intro it went to Eb major rather than G major/minor, but that's not a bad thing. Not much else I can say really, its lovely.
  2. Its a nice listen. I do think the constant jumps back down the piano in the left hand are very difficult (but possible). I think more variation in both hands would be good, as the patterns are pretty much the same throughout the whole piece. The end was a nice change. Also, if played on a real piano, following the pedal notation would make the piece sound quite muddy. It does work here though.
  3. Lovely stuff. As said before they're all playable. Are those photocopied images of the sheet music? They look a bit grainy.
  4. Thanks again @Luis HernándezI appreciate the time you take to listen and give feedback for the pieces I put on here. Yes for some reason it sounded fine with all those changes from duplets to triplets. I'll probably name it rhapsody then.
  5. Tried to improve on the old nocturne in Eb major. It was a real pain this one. Please let me know what you think and any feedback is good.
  6. Hi @Luis Hernández thanks very much for the detailed feedback here. Yes it does tend to fall on the beat and in measures, will try and add suspensions. I see what you mean about it sounding muddy, probably worth deleting some of the chord notes as you said. I'll shift the last part up an octave (at least some of it). Thanks again for the good advice on this piece.
  7. Didn't like the old c major nocturne so tried to make a new one. Please do leave feedback.
  8. Thanks @Monarcheon for the feedback. I did end up rewriting the theme so that it wasnt like that. I used it in my nocturne in d minor which is on this site. I'm not sure if some of it is neutonal or not.
  9. Thanks @BlindAdrenaline but this is not me playing its just Sibelius. I wish I could play that accurately. I see what you mean @caters. Do you reckon it needs a bit of changing then?
  10. I know I'm pushing it a bit calling this a nocturne. First time I have tried to compose this sort of piece. Please do let me know where to improve. Thanks.
  11. I was thinking of using this as a theme for a theme and variations piece but not sure if it fits that sort of thing. Any ideas if this is acceptable, or what needs to change? Thanks for any feedback.
  12. Thanks for the feedback and comments on the piece @SergeOfArniVillage and @.Em.. I'll have a look at varying m 33 on. Probably will go for a simple variation.
  13. Fifth nocturne. Maybe too repetitive but not completely sure. Please do give feedback if you have any. Thanks very much.
  14. Attempted a section in an odd time signature. Trying to combine the middle section with the rest of the piece took ages. Please do give feedback. Thanks.
  15. Is there any sheet music? Makes it easier to follow if there is. I found it pleasant though.
  • Create New...