Jump to content

In your opinion, which composer(s) have written the best music for piano?


MusicFiend

Recommended Posts

I'd say Chopin and Rachmaninov lead the pack, followed closely by Prokofiev, Debussy and Beethoven. The top ten would be completed by Mozart, Liszt (not a big fan of his, so I rank him rather lowly but still near the top), Ives, Scriabin and Ravel. Barely missing: Bach and Scarlatti. Grieg's and Brahms's concertos are awesome, but not enough to qualify their entire body of works.

Would only add that most of Tchaikovsky's piano music is wildly underrated (his two piano sonatas are decidedly weak, but most of his collections are surprisingly worthy).

YC members with the best piano music: JohnBucket and SergeOfArniVillage. Hands down. Also Xiangyik, if his piano music were playable at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

What's wrong with the jazz influence?

Well, I think when it happens in some cases, like on motive in the finale of the piano trio, it just doesn't belong with everything else that is there. I was in a lush, verdant world with flamboyant birds and strange plants, but then there's some Gershwin-esque theme and it throws me out of the world I was exploring. And the jazz world, being sort of urbane, is not one I prefer to explore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think when it happens in some cases, like on motive in the finale of the piano trio, it just doesn't belong with everything else that is there.

Fair enough.

,,,the jazz world, being sort of urbane, is not one I prefer to explore.

I'm not sure how you construe "urbane" in a negative sense; however, I expect you'll eventually change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Barely missing: Bach and Scarlatti. Grieg's and Brahms's concertos are awesome, but not enough to qualify their entire body of works.

both grieg and brahms have written quite enough piano solo works. To do as if their concrts are okay, but not enough (either in quality or in quantity) to be considered piano composers does not seem right.

Griegs lyric pieces, might be short and simple but form a nice starting point in the romantic era. And Brahms... The works of Brahms I know the best. He wrote sets of Intermezzi, Ballades, sonatas, Rapsodies. capricios, even more intermezzi. Not to mention the chamber work.

I've played a huge lot of Brahms on piano. Do you really think that these works are not 'enough to qualify their entire body of works.'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jaap: thanks for your comment.

Not to be mistaken: I like Grieg's pieces a lot. It's just that I didn't see them being as belonging into the top 10. That's the bad thing about rankings - you'll always be at fault for whatever you left out.

And Brahms... well, I have known many of his piano works, and like most of them so far. And he was nearly unsurpassable in chamber music. From the first moment after writing that post I have been regretting not having one of my own favorite composers ranking up there, and I can see why should Jaap (and others as well) might find his piano works all the more fascinating from the point of view of whoever is able to actually perform them (which I'm not). But since the OP was about the best piano music, and Brahms was at his best in chamber works instead, I didn't think it appropiate to include these into my assesment - but I will gladly admit being mistaken (anyway, I don't think my humble and unqualified opinion will do anything to cloud Brahms's reputation as one of the greatest creators of the Romantic era).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How dare Ravel attempt to convey more than one stylistic setting in a large scale work.

Well, I was just saying that, it doesn't facilitate what I prefer for my musical experience to be, which is where I create an imaginative world in my mind's eye that is accompanied by the music. And I think for my experience the vague jazziness of it detracts.

That's not to say I don't think Ravel is THE GREATEST piano composer....for me no one else even comes close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jaap: thanks for your comment.

Not to be mistaken: I like Grieg's pieces a lot. It's just that I didn't see them being as belonging into the top 10. That's the bad thing about rankings - you'll always be at fault for whatever you left out.

And Brahms... well, I have known many of his piano works, and like most of them so far. And he was nearly unsurpassable in chamber music. From the first moment after writing that post I have been regretting not having one of my own favorite composers ranking up there, and I can see why should Jaap (and others as well) might find his piano works all the more fascinating from the point of view of whoever is able to actually perform them (which I'm not). But since the OP was about the best piano music, and Brahms was at his best in chamber works instead, I didn't think it appropiate to include these into my assesment - but I will gladly admit being mistaken (anyway, I don't think my humble and unqualified opinion will do anything to cloud Brahms's reputation as one of the greatest creators of the Romantic era).

ok. I just thought that you were saying that only the concerti were of quality but not enough to compensate for the lack of (quality in) other works. That should have bee a blatant error. Lucky me to be proven wrong.

I think we still differ on what the OP could mean. If the text is 'best music written for piano' (and not piano music), than it could very well include chamber works. semantics ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...