luderart Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 I think that many a piece of mine could have benefited from further revision had I not decided too soon that it was finished. Now I am becoming more careful before declaring a piece finished. So how and when do you know (or decide) that a piece you are working on is finished? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norby Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 1. You've closed your piece as you planned (also the other parts layed out 'properly' according to your plans) 2. After listening it hundred of times (or more) you feel that cant improve it any more without diminishing its value 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robinjessome Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 None of my music is ever finished. Anything I perform is "close enough"; however changes and revisions may happen at any time. I'm constantly evolving as a musician and as a person, why shouldn't my music do the same? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austenite Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 Never. Just ask Schubert. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austenite Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 The general consensus is when the composer is dead. Though there are exceptions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maestrowick Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 ^^WOW! If you are a disciplined composer, it is finished when you have developed you ideas as fas as you can take it. (general consensus) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokkemon Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 1) When its finished. 2) When the performers need it for rehearsals. 3) The hour of the deadline. Personally, I hate revising pieces after the fact simply because I'm a better composer after the fact than when I wrote it. Its far easier to write a new work with the better composer in you than to mix the better and poorer composers in you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dscid Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 I agree with the idea that, you're a better composer, just write something new. However, if your writing deals with variations, why not just have variations of entire works, and keep them all? Unless, you listen to it enough that you realize it could use minor improvements, here and there, rather than restructuring, or adding parts all together. If your piece wasn't very cohesive or things like that, just consider yourself better and move on, and rework parts you deem worthy into new works as a whole. Consider your older stuff well thought out sketches :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sojar Voglar Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 When my composition is performed, I stop revising it forever. I am later, after becoming "smarter" and more experienced, observing some weak moments I wasn't aware of when composing (clumsiness in instrumentation, poor form, etc.) but I keep reserving this experiences for new work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phython Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 (edited) -- Emptied response due to construction reasons -- ;) Edited August 13, 2016 by phython Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.