Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's interesting. I rarely hear someone refer to a set class by its Forte number. 
Anyway, it's really well done. Watch out for the writing out of some of your rhythms and I feel like some of the things that maybe should come out are covered up by the other instruments but the ideas are good. Do you know "Pas de Deux" by Stravinsky? Take a listen and an analysis of that; late Stravinsky was a set class monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Monarcheon said:

It's interesting. I rarely hear someone refer to a set class by its Forte number. 
Anyway, it's really well done. Watch out for the writing out of some of your rhythms and I feel like some of the things that maybe should come out are covered up by the other instruments but the ideas are good. Do you know "Pas de Deux" by Stravinsky? Take a listen and an analysis of that; late Stravinsky was a set class monster.

 

The only reason I refer to the set by it's Forte number is that it makes a much better title. <1,0,2,1,1,1>  doesn't really have the same ring to it. :)

 I haven't heard of Pas de Deux, I'll be sure to give it a listen/analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...