JKO Compositions Posted February 4, 2021 Share Posted February 4, 2021 The 3rd quartet as part of the "Spring" trilogy, in a Rondo form. Let me know what you think! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterthePapercomPoser Posted February 4, 2021 Share Posted February 4, 2021 Nice! It's very light and spring like! I like how you do a fake recapitulation in the parallel minor. And it still sounds springy even though it's in the minor mode! I love the classical character of this. I can totally imagine a real string quartet playing this. It's very idiomatic and also catchy. There's also some very tasteful use of syncopation. All around a great piece and a very transparent rendition which sounds great! Thanks for sharing! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishCompositeur Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Love it! Stuff I liked: the crisp, memorable rhythms - the idiomatic string writing - cello lead-in to bars 9 and 73 - bars 17-20, with great counterpoint in the 2nd violin and a lovely cadence at the end leading into the main idea again - the interplay bar 93 on, plus the lead-in to that section, great stuff - bar 121 is awesome - the pedal at bar 156 - the martial rhythm at bar 41 etc... I could go on... Stuff to consider: bar 2 and others, the silence at the end of the bar distracts a little, maybe semiquavers A-B in the 1st violin to fill it? The silences work much better in the minor mode section... - bar 2 and others, parallel unison writing in the violins, plus parallel fifths and octaves in bars 36, 68, etc. (which I don't normally mind but in this classical idiom it's best to play by the rules) - the end of the first section at bar 23 could end with a loud mf, then the next section starts quietly at p, for maximum contrast - in addition, I would go straight from bar 24 to 37, the intermittent section just being the same but much lower (a little too much repetition there, I would just cut it) - I would also cut bars 123 and 124 since they work much better in the modified form in bars 238-239 - the ending should just be bar 241 with an ff dominant-tonic cadence with double-stopped chords, as per works of the time; the brief Vivace section is a cool idea but it doesn't hold the high quality of the rest IMO... Anyway, those are some thoughts. Well done for a good piece! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.