10 Variations on a Gypsy Theme for Clarinet Quartet

I found this piece in an old notebook.  I had originally scored it for 2 Clarinets and an Oboe and Bassoon.  But after checking the Bass Clarinet range and finding that it had the same range as Bassoon, I rearranged it for Clarinet Quartet and finished it.  The variations are as follows:

0:40 - I - Stack
1:18 - II - Leapfrog
1:54 - III - Siciliana
2:51 - IV - Lilt
3:38 - V - Waltz
4:39 - VI - Lilt 2
5:12 - VII - Scherzo
6:07 - VIII - Fugue
6:50 - IX - Synthesis
7:17 - X - Coda

I've been told that the piece is a bit monotonous (I guess that's always a problem to contend with in variations pieces - making the variations different enough from each other to sustain interest).  But let me know what you think!  I welcome any of your suggestions, comments, critiques or observations.  Thanks for listening!

It's a fun theme, and I think you do a good job at keeping things interesting despite working with just one theme. The first variation is FIRE. Your other variations leading to the fugue are good, but as other people have said, there's a lot of repetition. But you know what, that's ok because it led you to writing the fugue variation. And the fugue is by far the most powerful writing of this piece, which makes the whole darn thing worth listening to. In fact, the fugue with your last variation + coda make the last 2 minutes or so incredibly powerful.

Didn't listen to it, just glanced over the score!  It's really good, just not in a music mood right now.  If I listen to anything today, probably something like the Grateful Dead or the Doobie Brothers!  I'll get to it eventually; I LOVE clarinet, like C.M.V. Weber!

Well, not totally true; I might listen to some of my own stuff yet again.  Not "musical masturbation;" I just do it to see if there is anything I might need to change, minor edits.

This has nothing to do with anything, but the music in this Russian cartoon:

МЫШКИ - МАЛЫШКИ. Сказка. СССР.«Киевнаучфильм». Реставрация.

is awesome; not the cartoon, it is mediocre.  I mean the music!  That scraggy be awesome, if I may be permitted to use the colloquial.  I can't write that good!  Kind of a bit of jazzy Shostakovich in there, but he didn't write it.  Might have to "steal" that one! 

17 hours ago, Churchcantor said:

Didn't listen to it, just glanced over the score!  It's really good, just not in a music mood right now.  If I listen to anything today, probably something like the Grateful Dead or the Doobie Brothers!  I'll get to it eventually; I LOVE clarinet, like C.M.V. Weber!

Well, not totally true; I might listen to some of my own stuff yet again.  Not "musical masturbation;" I just do it to see if there is anything I might need to change, minor edits.

 

This is really weird, but a 24-year-old Ukrainian kid stumbled onto one of my old, old YouTube posts, and he has become a sort of pen pal, and it is taking a lot of my time right now, so I'm often too worn out to keep my promises about listening to things, editing things right away.  No biggie, but I'm pretty sure I won't write a piece for at least a couple months as well!  No offence meant, of course!

He is not a musician, just fascinated by theory/composition, Henry!  I don't mean "really" worn out, it's fun!  I just mean I will be relaxing more, watching movies, etc.  

By the way, I really DO want to hear this whole piece with the score; who knows, might be today!

13 minutes ago, Churchcantor said:

He is not a musician, just fascinated by theory/composition, Henry!  I don't mean "really" worn out, it's fun!  I just mean I will be relaxing more, watching movies, etc.  

I just feel weird you leave comments completely unrelated to the piece posted, maybe you can move to post in the Random post? That would be much more appropriate.

Henry

IT IS NOT UNRELATED:  earlier in the post when I said I would listen to it yesterday and then did not?

12 hours ago, Henry Ng Tsz Kiu said:

I just feel weird you leave comments completely unrelated to the piece posted, maybe you can move to post in the Random post? That would be much more appropriate.

Thanks Henry for pointing this out.

@Churchcantor In your own words:

21 hours ago, Churchcantor said:

This has nothing to do with anything, but the music in this Russian cartoon

16 hours ago, Churchcantor said:

This is really weird, but a 24-year-old Ukrainian kid stumbled onto one of my old, old YouTube posts, and he has become a sort of pen pal, and it is taking a lot of my time right now, so I'm often too worn out to keep my promises about listening to things, editing things right away.  No biggie, but I'm pretty sure I won't write a piece for at least a couple months as well!  No offence meant, of course!

12 hours ago, Churchcantor said:

By the way, I really DO want to hear this whole piece with the score; who knows, might be today!

So basically your posts so far could basically be summed up as "Haven't yet had the time nor mood to listen to it yet."  I would rather hear what you might have to say about the music once you actually do listen to it, instead of posting 6 replies to my topic which don't discuss anything about the music.  Before you replied, my topic had one reply by Chopin and was still on the "Works with Few Reviews" List.  But now that you've cluttered the topic with meaningless posts, the topic is no longer on that list and is less likely to receive actual substantive reviews from the other members of the forum.

There are places on the forum where you can post this kind of content though - such as in Off Topic - Journals.  Or in the case of the Russian cartoon - either Random or Repertoire.  Or you can tell your stories by posting status updates in your profile.  But I think you are trashing the forum with the way you are currently using it.

Interesting; I'll read it later.

Just a friendly reminder to please try and keep the discussion strictly about the piece.

21 minutes ago, Churchcantor said:

Interesting; I'll read it later.

Have you had enough time to read it yet?