Jump to content
  • Chatbox

    Please consider reviewing as well as posting. Not only does it help balance the number of works on the site, but it helps you get involved! You may think you have nothing to add, but something as simple as "this was cool because of this part" or "something about 0:35 threw me off a bit" does help. Thanks!

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  1. Board

    1. Announcements and Technical Problems

      Check here for the latest news, report technical problems with the board, or submit your suggestions

    2. Young Composers Magazine

      All topics related to the Young Composers Magazine go here.  If you are interested in signing up, please join our magazine club.

  2. Upload Your Compositions for Analysis or Feedback

    1. Orchestral and Large Ensemble

      Upload compositions which use an orchestra or a large ensemble (defined as one requiring a conductor)

    2. Chamber Music

      Upload compositions written for a small group of instruments (including works with piano), or for solo instruments (other than works for solo keyboard)

    3. Choral, Vocal

      Upload compositions that extensively make use of one or more singers, whether in the form of a soloist or a chorus

    4. Piano Music, Solo Keyboard

      Upload piano and solo keyboard works

    5. Incidental Music and Soundtracks

      Upload video game music, film music and other forms not primarily intended for the concert stage

    6. Jazz, Band, Pop, Rock

      Upload Jazz, Band or Pop/Rock compositions

    7. Electronic

      Upload music which makes use of electronic resources

    8. Incomplete Works; Writer's Block and Suggestions

      Works here must be attached using the forum's attachment method. Incomplete works will not be categorized in the network.

  3. Community

    1. Masterclasses

      Contains a selection of Masterclasses.

    2. Music Appreciation: Suggest Works or Articles

      Suggest works and discuss past and/or present events, for the sake of Music Appreciation.  Link to YouTube videos, iTunes links, online articles and composers websites.

    3. Composers' Headquarters

      General discussion on composer-related issues and music composition.

    4. Repertoire

      Talk about musical repertoire, from full-blown orchestral works to solo piano pieces

    5. Performance

      Discuss the performance of music here, such as the characteristics and limitations of different instruments

    6. Advice and Techniques

      Offer informal advice on methods of composition, compositional technique (e.g., fugue writing, chorale-style harmonization), etc., that you feel may be of benefit and interest to our members.

  4. Competitions and Collaboration

    1. Competition Hall of Fame

      A list of winning works of all of our competitions

    2. Monthly Competitions

      NEW Smaller-scale competitions held on a monthly basis

    3. Collaborative Works

      Work on a piece with other composers

    4. Challenges

      "Little creative exercises for composers to think outside of the box."

    5. External Competitions

      External competitions that are not hosted by Young Composers.

  5. Technological

    1. Finale and Sibelius Help Desk

      Post questions about Finale or Sibelius here

    2. Sound Libraries

      Discuss different sound libraries. This is also the place to talk about software samplers, such as EWQL, VSL, GPO, Kontakt and Gigastudio

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 16 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Music Jotter Windows Demo

  • Works With Few Reviews

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good. The parts doesn't seem difficult but they fit well in this classic style.
    • Very nice and enjoyable piece. I see you have a detailed and realistic (but difficult sometimes) writing for the piano and I like it. The overall feeling is very rhythmic, almost in an ostinato, so the counterpoint parts (teh beginning) are a good contrast. However, it doesn't sound impressionistic to me. It's tonal and harmony doesn't leave the audience any doubt (which is the essence of impressionism). I think it moves between classic and romantic language. But it's quite original, and that's what counts. (I'd love to see the mornings you describe in Iceland....)
    • Ah, Jared, these are marvels. The color, the structure, the abstractness. Comments for each piece individually are below. Gigue: The lilting effect was quite reminiscent of the sea. The theme was embedded and embellished throughout. I congratulate you! Serenade: Short but oh, so sweet! There is a richness here that was quite delightful. Music aside, I do believe you misspelled 'koi' at the end there. Dance: This one might have been my favorite. The colorful chords along with the tasteful rhythm kept me smiling. Fantasy: Superbly written piece, and the musical directions were just as fascinating.  Dirge: Another favorite of mine—so melancholic. And I found it interesting that you switched to French for the descriptive post-title. Curious as to your reasons for that... Toccata: Loved the back-and-forth between the hands. Also, you used the word 'epigram' in a piece of music. How pithy of you. Berceuse: What depth! And the colorful imagery throughout is just breathtaking! In m18, though, I was confused about the 8th note chord in the bass before the half note chord. If it's an appoggiatura, shouldn't it be attached by a slur? If it's not, perhaps put a little distance between those two chords so the meaning is clearer. Caprice: This particular piece had a strong taste of impressionism (Debussy would be proud), and the return to the original theme at m42 was masterfully done! Even though this piece moved quickly and the chords were unconventional, none of the nuances were lost on me. Very well done, sir! I continue to be impressed by your musical prowess. It's quite apparent you put a good deal of thought and planning into these works, and I suppose that's why I find your music particularly appealing. There is no superfluity, only an overarching cohesiveness that ensures every note that's written makes sense, belongs. You must be an aesthetic minimalist, because it's as if your music has been distilled down so that each idea is effectively conveyed using as few notes as possible. I consider your works nothing short of masterpieces. I do hope the world discovers you someday. Thanks again for sharing yourself through your music! I look forward to hearing more of it!
    • This song is the first in a five-movement suite inspired by my time in Iceland.  The opening theme uses counterpoint and sustained notes to emulate that feeling of joy-anxiety each new day brings. There is a transitional passage that builds with anticipation into the middle theme, which is harmonically less complex than the first—this is meant to represent that feeling of unbridled peace an early morning stroll in nature brings. The middle theme is repeated in various keys and modulations before the return to the opening theme and the piece ends in a soft, arppegiated finish. Mornings anywhere are special times, but I find them particularly breathtaking in Iceland. There are so few people and so many natural phenomena that one can't help but be spiritually touched by íslensk dögun—an Icelandic dawn. (Be warned: sunrises/sunsets are difficult to catch in high summer and winter, as the sun never really rises/sets.) I couldn't resist incorporating a morning song into a suite about that lovely country! The overall style of the song is impressionistic... you likely won't come away humming any melodies, but (hopefully) you will come away with those feelings etched on your soul for a while. BTW I'm a pianist and, as such, strive to make my piano songs as enjoyable to play as possible. You'll notice quite a bit of hand-crossing, melody-driven left-hand passages, and many other "fun" effects. I think that's enough words for now. Please, enjoy and comment! I always love hearing how the piece made you feel, and what did or didn't sit well with you!
    • While I am not as familiar with this piece as I am sure you now are, I felt you managed to capture the piece effectively for the orchestra! It certainly felt quite natural. My critique would be to be cautious in excessive line-doubling. For instance, in m. 64, while I understand the rationale in doubling the line of say the first violin, I can envision the woodwinds providing rhythmic accentuation there rather than simply following the lead of the violins (with the second violins following the first, but an octave down, a more resonant logic). The dialogue that you develop between the instruments, mm. 36 - 44 as an example, felt much more liquid and effective. Great job, nonetheless!
  • Create New...