Yesterday at 05:39 AM1 day I am trying to do what some of the late romantic composers did in their time:Keep refining even after a work have been published to improve the piece further.(Mahler, Liszt, Bruckner and others did this)Any critique is welcome.I refined and changed a few sections in the piece even re wrote some parts. While some sections stayed the same.Thanks in advance.revisit warborn work in progress.pdfWarborn version 2 wip re write title 05-04-2026 newest - Flow 1.mp3
Yesterday at 06:53 PM1 day Why hello there, When I was listening to your piece, I heard a compound meter and not simple meter. From the score, you have a simple meter (3/4) with triplets that gave me that me that impression. and Other triplet figures too... Switch 3/4 and replace it with 9/8. you will still have the triplet feel! You might have to adjust some bars to adjust to meter. But overall, you will be surprised...The direct modulation from D-A was a nice surprise. It reminded how J. Williams modulates.
2 hours ago2 hr Author Thanks a lot for your comment @Kvothe I re wrote the score with new ideas and tried to improve it with the 9/8 meter. Others have mention it as well and I thought then why not give it a try then?Here is the new re written version. WarBorn complete re write draft 3 03-04-2026 - Flow 1.mp3 Warborn recomposed draft 3.pdf
1 hour ago1 hr Hi @Bjarke !Good job making the score look cleaner! I think it really simplifies the look when you write it in 9/8. But you could have applied the same logic to the 5/4 bar as well! You could have written it as a 15/8 bar! Thanks for sharing.
25 minutes ago25 min Great, that looks better.For the next version, I want to look through the score and look at bars repeat the same material and re think them. I am sure the piece can logically breathe with out them, yes? After that, we will look at 5/4 section...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.