Hi @Awsumerguy,
Thx!
That timpani at the introduction is so much alike with Brahms' Symphony no.1. Also the beginning of the exposition, as noted before, is very much like Mahler's Symphony no.2.
For me, I feel like the preparation to the section in 4:54 a bit too long with those dominant pedals and Gs, maybe I will shorten it. The 4:54 is very beautiful though.
For me the gap in b.129 and then the sudden forte chords after it is a bit abrupt without preparation. I think you are recapitulating the introductory theme here, but I think you can move more smoothly to build up the forte chords reasonably and fluently! The modulation to A minor is quite nice, just like that freakingly god modulation in Brahms' Symphony no.1 finale!
I feel like the modulation back to C minor in b.231 again not prepare enough when you just use common notes for modulations. Harmonically it works but dramatically and narratively it doesn't for me. I think you can at least give some disappointment to the music before getting back to C minor.
As @Markus Boyd noted the coda is so dramatic and I like it very much too!
For me maybe the shortcoming of the movement is the planning and structure of it. The beginning and the end is very exciting to listen to, but between them there's not much contrast of energy and drama. The energy is more or less in the less exciting side, rather than ups and downs to excite the listeners. There is indeed contrast of mood, but both are serene and less exciting. The solo passages are beautiful, but sometimes you can feel less interested when you keep immersing in beautiful passages. I hope there will be some passages with fire and force inserted between, instead holding the fire till the end burst! Honestly I feel bored up to minute 9, until the coda!
Hope I won't be too nitpicky on this one. But for me you are one who have the horizon to write very good music and I hope my nitpicky review helps a bit on it. Thx for sharing!
Henry