Jump to content

"Veil" - Character Piece for Piano Quintet


Keifer Brown

Recommended Posts

    Hey, my name's Keifer Brown. I'm 18 years old and I started learning composing in, roughly, August last year. I've written mainly for string orchestra but I haven't had any of my music rehearsed live, so I don't know what my compositions really sound like except in a sequencer. I've been looking at this site for a bit and I decided to post a piece I've written here for critique as you guys seem to be really helpful and nice! :)

    I have attached sheet music (Veil Sheet Music.pdf) and an MP3 (Veil Render.mp3) for a piece I've written for piano quintet, called "Veil." Any advice is welcome! I look forward to joining this site's community as well.

 

MP3
0:00
0:00
PDF
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall, not a bad job. Lots of really good moments and generally okay chord structure (i.e. no crossed voices).
There are a couple thing to mention:
1. What are the x's on top of the notes in the beginning for? Artificial harmonics? Those should be diamonds, rather than x's.
2. It should probably be longer... I heard a lot of good rises and falls, but no so much "development" in the traditional sense.
3. Non-harmonic tone issues; there are a lot of times where you have a note that moves a semitone away, which is fine, but you typically have another note in the quartet that's holding the same note as that instrument, therefore creating dissonance that doesn't resolve.
4. A couple notation issues, like m. 27; just make sure that when you put notes down, it's always in terms of the beat scheme of the bar. Like that measure should be:
8th, Dotted 1/4 tied to quarter, 8th, 8th. 
5. m. 33 sounds like a direct modulation and I think you may have wanted a common chord one. Look out for common tones in the previous chord before modulation just to make sure it's what you want.

Builds well and definitely flows, but it feels like a heartrate machine where there are little blips in the line. Good luck and welcome!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply, Monarcheon!

1. You're right, they are artificial harmonics. I'll correct that! Is this written correctly?:
30a9425f1541fabe3133104a02c147a6.png

2. I was aware of the relative shortness of the piece but I didn't really see where development fit in with my overall plan of the piece. 

3. I wasn't aware that was a problem, thank you. My ear tends to "forgive" dissonance (if that makes sense) so I have trouble with hearing issues with that.

4. Ok. Would you mind clarifying if it's a hard and fast rule that you have to divide notes going across the center (except for whole notes) of the measure?

5. I did in fact want a direct modulation. Do you think a common chord modulation would fit better? I rather like the effect of the direct modulation but I'm so inexperienced that I may not know what I want.

6. When you say "heartrate machine with little blips in the line," do you just mean that's because there are technical issues with the piece, or are you talking about how the overall piece sounds to you? And how can I avoid this?
EDIT: Are you by any chance talking about the more or less constant eighth note motion throughout the piece?

Thank you again so much for taking the time to give feedback! I really appreciate it! :)

Edited by Keifer Brown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Keifer Brown said:

You're right, they are artificial harmonics. I'll correct that! Is this written correctly?

Yep. Make sure that the diamond is a perfect fourth above so if you need to add a sharp or flat to it, do it.

12 minutes ago, Keifer Brown said:

I wasn't aware that was a problem, thank you. My ear tends to "forgive" dissonance (if that makes sense) so I have trouble with hearing issues with that.

It's not a problem. Since this piece was mostly tonal to my ears, I applied the normal guidelines for it for the review, but if you want to do it, that's fine. Resolution is the problem, not so much the act itself.

14 minutes ago, Keifer Brown said:

Ok. Would you mind clarifying if it's a hard and fast rule that you have to divide notes going across the center (except for whole notes) of the measure?

It depends on your time signature. For a simple quadruple meter, yes, that's required. But if the time signature was 1/8 + 5/8 + 2/8, it wouldn't be a problem, make sense?

15 minutes ago, Keifer Brown said:

I did in fact want a direct modulation. Do you think a common chord modulation would fit better? I rather like the effect of the direct modulation but I'm so inexperienced that I may not know what I want.

It's your piece! I give you another perspective, but you like what you like.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really loved this, great work! As noted above, at very rare occasions some notes feel like they're not in the place one would have preferred. I understand the idea of how they were supposed to sound, but it didn't sound perfect enough to do the needed effect.. I believe a simple revision would be all that's needed to fix these parts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the feedback @Vadrif D. Zobrist! I'm so glad you loved it!

I'll definitely keep that in mind. I've been working hard to write something good enough for someone to play so I can learn what actually works as opposed to what I think will work. Until I can manage that, I'll focus on keeping errors of that nature out of my work. Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...