Saturday at 03:57 AM5 days I thought I'd share this short prelude I started last year and finished soon after (which I originally intended to use for Valentines' Day this year, but alas...). I haven't been writing much new stuff and am currently working on fixing up a few of my older compositions so this was one of the few things I did manage to conjure up in the past few months. I hope it's listenable? (as for playability, arpeggiating large chords is a must, haha)
Yesterday at 06:43 PM1 day It’s a composition that sounds very harmonious and sweet. I haven’t taken the time to analyze it, but that middle section caught my attention (the key signature change).
Yesterday at 07:09 PM1 day Nice stuff. F Sharp?! Why? So many sharps! Anyways, taking a guess, the next thing you compose is in F Flat Major.
Yesterday at 09:50 PM1 day I very enjoyed this dreamy prelude with its nocturne-like charm.What I was especially excited for is the tonality, e.g the use of both F-sharp major and G-flat major. (I mention this because my last recently posted composition is in G-flat major/F-sharp major, too, while not a prelude but a fugue …). I guess you’ve chosen that key change to emphasize the different nuances of mood in the piece, the sharps for the brighter passages and the flats for the melancholic ones.The texture is well balanced and I like that you decided to present the score with revealing the five-part movement.As you yourself noted, there are some large chords which are playable with arpeggiating only. When I’m looking at the score at the first glance, there are – beside the large chords – some intervals that seem to be uncomfortable to be played. However, many of them are playable when taking a note in the other hand. I would appreciate, if such situations would be written out or marked in the score (even if it would look somewhat cluttered) for an easier sight-reading experience.
2 hours ago2 hr 22 hours ago, Wieland Handke said:sharps for the brighter passages and the flats for the melancholic ones.I would argue sharps are more brilliant, flats are more ambient, and c major... is just nursery rhymes basically.
1 hour ago1 hr Hallo @TristanTheTristan ,Haha, F-flat major, a key with a double flat in its key signature …But thanks for the link; interestingly, it included some examples where composers actually used F-flat major, at least in certain passages or movements of their works.So you brought me to an idea: Since I have not yet composed my E-major fugue, there might be a spot where I could use F-flat major in a passage with a mood that calls for flats rather than sharps (I associate the mood of flats with „darker“ and „somber“, but also „warmer“ and „mellow“.)But to take it a step further, I should not use F-flat major, but F-flat lydian, so that I could make a key signature change in the score to seven flats in order to stay within the common range of usable accidentals. And the mood of F-flat lydian must be completely confusing: As „dark“ as possible due to the seven flats and „luminous“ at the same time, from the Lydian mode.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.