All Activity

What a cool ensemble, having the bass clarinet and bassoon. I think you really hit the mark with instrument choices, I imagined a black cat walking a wooden fence with the full moon out. Very much a picturesque halloween piece, and you write so fast too! The balance of quirky parts (my favorite was the clarinet rhythm section at like 2:50) and lush UncleRed-type chordal figures with piano worked really well. Score looks good, some enharmonics issues (watch the leading tone) but definitely clean and neat. You're pretty good about your score editing, so nothing new there. 😄 Quintet? 😛

Here is my submission for the competition! I look forward to the feedback, and thank all others for their submissions as well. I haven't finished going through the other submissions that I have not commented on, yet. But will do so ASAP! Enjoy 🙂

I had NO Idea what to name this piece. But I've worked diligently on it, and I feel that it's as good as I'm able to make it. Really just shot for the Halloween/Spooky vibe with both the Instrumentation, key, and rhythmic inflections. Hope y'all enjoy my fun lil' sextet piece 😉 YCF Halloween Composition 2025.pdf YCF Halloween Composition 2025.mp3

MY_MUSIC_014_20230718_143855_20240812_214813_AudioVerb_1.mp3

MY_MUSIC_021_20240118_052325.mp3

Do you have music in the works for this one, Brianna? It looks like a good start!

I've been writting a string quintet inspired by different cryptids. I'd love to submit it - not sure if it has to be written specifically for this challenge.

I agree as well. And the way to get around the system is to use dollar signs instead of s's: a$$. LoL .. now we just need a forum AI to detect this kind of clever bypass.

MY_MUSIC_224_20241018_091605_AudioVerb.mp3

MY_MUSIC_091_20240222_175620_AudioVerb.mp3

Hi Tunndy, I agree you whipped the donkey of the AI! (Edit: The system won't let me use the other word for donkey; but I'm sure you can guess what I meant to write!) Not sure artificial intelligence will ever be able to understand what music really is. (Hope I'm right, otherwise we could all be out of a job soon!)

Hello, everyone! How are you? I haven't posted anything here in a long time, so I'll make up for it now. Unfortunately, with school starting, I don't have as much time for composing, but I try to set aside some time for my hobby between my studies. My latest composition is my first piano sonata. The composition is again interwoven with my specific style and I find it quite demanding to listen to. If you have a moment, I'd be happy if you listened to it. Thank you very much, I'm glad to be here with you! https://youtu.be/druaasJ6ebs?si=2BloE5frY6pu4EI9

Really thanks! It was somehow familiar to me, but I also don't think this is plagiarism now.

This is about the overall consensus of what I would've said had I been here earlier. lol However, I'd like to add, that this score is quite repetitive, and sort of irks the ear after hearing the same thing so many times over. I also am having a hard time pinpointing any specific key that you intended the music to be in. (Seems Atonal, or keyless. Perfectly OK choice, but I'm not so sure it makes a lot of sense, in my head. That's likely due to my way of seeing music. So that point is on the whole, irrelevant.) Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 6 3 6 9 4 7 7 6.5 Overall Score Average: 5.25

Melodies Themes Motives Harmony Chords Textures Form Development Structure Time Originality Creativity Score Presentation Instrumentation Orchestration Playability Execution of Given Challenge Taste 4 7 4 10 10 5 5 5 Overall Score Average: 6.25 Melodies Themes and Motives: 4 My reasoning for a 4 is because the music, for me at least, seemed difficult to follow. I did lose my place a couple of times, and there really is no melody, not any one line that sticks out at any given moment. Although, I believe that this piece's intent is to be jarring, random, or playful in it's nature, if I'm assuming correctly. (I'm sorry, I couldn't take the time to read the introduction page. 😅 It kept cutting off for me. Possibly something to do with my browser) Harmony, Chords, Textures: 7 Overall, I think the harmonic complexity and textures presented here are very good! I don't have a lot of technical wording to use to describe it, as it's very unique, but nonetheless, well done! Form, Dev., Structure, Time: 4 (I'm assuming it's supposed to be this way) I wasn't really able to differentiate too much between your sections. The textures change, but not in a fluid manner, from what I observed. The Development of the piece is mostly unchanging throughout the piece. There are moments of more pronounced dynamics, then moments of lower dynamics with only 1 or 2 parts playing. Which does show some form of development, but this would be unclear to the average listener. I also have to say, I've never seen or even considered using a time signature with a denominator of 16. 😅 to be frank, I have no idea how I'd even begin to count that. I simply followed the notes on the page, as I heard them passing, to get through those measures. Personally, I feel there may have been a more sensible choice than 3/16. (Simply my opinion) Originality: 10 What else can I say? Never seen anything like this one, honestly. And I'm diggin' the uniqueness of it, despite any of my grievances with it. Score Presentation: 10 Very Professional - Very Demure 😎 Ins. Orch. Playability: 5 Overall, this is technically able to be performed... However, I feel that an excessive amount of time would go into rehearsing something like this, with 3 musicians, just looking at it practically. The syncopation is off the CHARTS my man... 😭 As well as some parts where I notice the pitch jumps over an octave from the previous note/measure, which can be very difficult, especially for wind players, to execute. Execution: 5 It would scare me if I had this music set in front of me as a musician. So I think that qualifies it as "spooky" but it's not very reminiscent of pieces I'd consider to be "Halloween-ey" or however you'd put that 😅 Taste: 5 I only put a 5 here because I'm not quite sure what sort of flavor you were shooting for. I feel that this score is more reminiscent of your own taste, adding to the Originality of the score. So, I'd wager that this is a totally unique score of your own design/genre, mostly. That's about all the input I have on that topic.

Updated post: Link that was attached was no longer available due to deletion of the video. Recently, when I was handing my score off to a pianist to perform this one in it's solo piano version, I made the decision to reflect changes made from the solo version to the full version as well. So; Key Signature / Key changed to B Minor, at the beginning, and modulates to E minor for the final part rather than Starting in D minor Made changes to multiple markings / expression texts throughout the score Changes to the piano part where rhythm and playability were a concern

MY_MUSIC_004_20241226_144216_AudioVerb.mp3

MY_MUSIC_082_20240215_104222_AudioVerb.mp3

MY_MUSIC_054_20240423_004706_AudioVerb.mp3

MY_MUSIC_008_20240405_024730_AudioVerb.mp3

MY_MUSIC_020_20231019_162402_022841824.mp3

Thank you very much for your kind and respectful opinion, I appreciate very much the fact that you're interested to my work, thank you very much!

Hello Demertzis, I listened so far to three of your piano pieces. I was impressed, especially by this one. I have to say that you have a rich fund of creativity and are an undiscovered genius of piano music!! Bravo. I hope that you notate your music and give it to actual performers so that the world will hear your great music interpreted by the great pianists that it deserves!!!

MY_MUSIC_299_20250317_000325_AudioVerb.mp3

19 Φεβ 06_012528411.mp3