...
Personally, arguing that if philosophically impeccable, then it must be true, is dishonest. Maybe it's just an opinion of mine, but be it objective or not, I feel a photocopy of a Bach's invention... just a loving photocopy of a Bach's invention! Am I being so blind or stubborn?:(
Anyways, I agree that the effort put into a work of art does not matter at all. What I care is the final thing I get, be it the work of years or of ten minutes, or just the result of chance. Not that it is skillful, farting could still be artistically valid, of course. I'm not being ironic (not that much). I truly understand, 'cos I share it, the position of enjoying artistically what has not been commonly considered so -either some bird singing, or someone's fart (if I dislike the farting it's not because of its lack of merit, just a matter of personal taste). I really take pleasure, musically, in the silence home at night.
Now, let' us not be hypocrite. If we're going to apreciate silence, of farting, as music, let's change our artistic standards: I'm not going to go to a concert hall to listen to someone farting. That may be art, but perfectly free art, I'll just enjoy it on daily life. Just common sense, you know.