Jump to content

Trio Variations in D Minor: A submission to the 2025 Halloween Composition Competition


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey Tristan

Well, I think this piece is definitely a front runner for most unique ensemble, more so than mine at least haha. Cool choice to use two pianos and only one string player, I was curious to see how you'd pull it off. 

I like the variety of variations you have, it made it interesting all the way through. My favorite was probably 5, but I also really like the subtle build of the last variations leading into the coda. It's also smart to have ones like variation 10 to help break up the monotony. 

Cool music! I hope the competition gave some inspiration to music you would otherwise have never written. It did for me 🙂 

Cheers buddy, good stuff. Keep writing and practicing!

 

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Thatguy v2.0 said:

Hey Tristan

Well, I think this piece is definitely a front runner for most unique ensemble, more so than mine at least haha. Cool choice to use two pianos and only one string player, I was curious to see how you'd pull it off. 

I like the variety of variations you have, it made it interesting all the way through. My favorite was probably 5, but I also really like the subtle build of the last variations leading into the coda. It's also smart to have ones like variation 10 to help break up the monotony. 

Cool music! I hope the competition gave some inspiration to music you would otherwise have never written. It did for me 🙂 

Cheers buddy, good stuff. Keep writing and practicing!

 

 

Thanks for your feedback!

Posted
2 hours ago, Thatguy v2.0 said:

Hey Tristan

Well, I think this piece is definitely a front runner for most unique ensemble, more so than mine at least haha. Cool choice to use two pianos and only one string player, I was curious to see how you'd pull it off. 

I like the variety of variations you have, it made it interesting all the way through. My favorite was probably 5, but I also really like the subtle build of the last variations leading into the coda. It's also smart to have ones like variation 10 to help break up the monotony. 

Cool music! I hope the competition gave some inspiration to music you would otherwise have never written. It did for me 🙂 

Cheers buddy, good stuff. Keep writing and practicing!

 

 

Also, you might be surprised at the end because of the picardy third. That is because I put a have put a quote in there. Read it, (maybe).

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi @TristanTheTristan!

This one has a cool atmosphere in it! And I like how you vary the theme.

I am more on the playability issue here. The quadruple stops in b.31-38 are unpractical to be played on a real violin, like in b.32-36 any notes lower than the E string would be unplayable with the E string to achieve the quadruple stops. The double pizz. in b.152 variation can also be difficult to play too, as well as the seconds in b.198 for 2nd piano and the octaves for pianists in b.296.

Also, I hope there are moments when the first piano's melody isn't the same as the violin's melody!

Nonetheless, good attempt to write in a variation form!

Henry

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 10/12/2025 at 10:58 AM, TristanTheTristan said:

This is easy. 10 out of 10. Simply outstanding. And a perfect five minutes? Great. 10 out of 10. Winner here.

 

agreed

 

(this is not a joke lol)

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

9.5 8 8.5 9 7.5 7 9.5 9

Entry: Trio Variations in D Minor

Hi @TristanTheTristan

I am going to highlight areas the areas that believe could reworked. 

As a pianist, I think those 32nd notes could be replace by tremolos instead.  They have a similar effect.  The readable in the piano section is hard at times. I do not where the beats are. You have difficult rythmn patterns that make it hard to play. Also, those single note tremolos, are not idiomatic. You will see them more in strings. What you need to do is write them out. Trust me!  That is why you scored 7 in playabity and in 7.5 score presentation. 

You score higher in the other areas for it was original, creative, and you knew how to create variations. You carried through this competition.  And you melodic material was spot on. It just needs better notation and idiomatic writing. 

7.4/10 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Kvothe said:

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

9.5 8 8.5 9 7.5 7 9.5 9

Entry: Trio Variations in D Minor

Hi @TristanTheTristan

I am going to highlight areas the areas that believe could reworked. 

As a pianist, I think those 32nd notes could be replace by tremolos instead.  They have a similar effect.  The readable in the piano section is hard at times. I do not where the beats are. You have difficult rythmn patterns that make it hard to play. Also, those single note tremolos, are not idiomatic. You will see them more in strings. What you need to do is write them out. Trust me!  That is why you scored 7 in playabity and in 7.5 score presentation. 

You score higher in the other areas for it was original, creative, and you knew how to create variations. You carried through this competition.  And you melodic material was spot on. It just needs better notation and idiomatic writing. 

7.4/10 

 

 

Thanks! ( I would react that, I just can't react more today) I am pretty sure the average would not be 7.4, though. I am pretty sure it would be 8.5. Anyways, (again) thanks for the feedback!

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TristanTheTristan said:

Thanks! ( I would react that, I just can't react more today) I am pretty sure the average would not be 7.4, though. I am pretty sure it would be 8.5. Anyways, (again) thanks for the feedback!

 

 

Oh you are correct. It would be 8.5. My math was wrong.  

Posted (edited)

@TristanTheTristan
As I am still getting accustomed to the site, I have taken it upon myself to get familiar with some of the other forums and type of music people have put on YCF. I have been interested to explore what people have to offer, and from my curiosity, I decided to also start giving feedback on scores submitted by people for this Halloween Competition.

This said, to whomever I comment on, I will be treating them like a professional and write based on the expectation that they know, at minimum, intermediate music theory. For now, I will avoid making a table of my rating, however, please find the following to be my review of your submission. As a final note, I like to be straightforward with colleagues, and by no means am I coming from a place of bad faith. I want to push my peers to new heights, and I will be honest with them so they know the truth and can evolve from there.
__________

While fitting the criteria of the competition, I do not see this piece as a practical work made for performance. I have noticed multiple errors where a professional concert pianist would have a high level of difficulty playing this work; specifically "Variation 4" where you employ single note tremelos. However, they are not uncommon to use as Liszt, and Debussy used them in their music. Liszt in the Friska from "Hungarian Rhapsody no. 2" and Debussy from the Prelude "...Ce qu'a vu le vent d'ouest". In comparison, your usage of them is more difficult due to the amount of note shifts a pianist will have to do, versus the raw technique.

In a similar mindset, I do not believe the first section from measures 1-40 to be realistically playable on the piano. Continuing on, the engraving for the score concerns me heavily. The measures seem to be too small or placed too closely together throughout and in spots, like measure 128, you have two different spellings for the same note (G# and Ab). Musically, is it rather interesting and I did enjoy the theme you created. I love to write in D-minor when given the chance, and I was vibing with the "sinister" nature the key provides in your theme.

If you would like to talk more or explore these comments, I would not mind doing so. Thank you for taking the time to read this 🙂

Edited by MK_Piano
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, MK_Piano said:

@TristanTheTristan
As I am still getting accustomed to the site, I have taken it upon myself to get familiar with some of the other forums and type of music people have put on YCF. I have been interested to explore what people have to offer, and from my curiosity, I decided to also start giving feedback on scores submitted by people for this Halloween Competition.

This said, to whomever I comment on, I will be treating them like a professional and write based on the expectation that they know, at minimum, intermediate music theory. For now, I will avoid making a table of my rating, however, please find the following to be my review of your submission. As a final note, I like to be straightforward with colleagues, and by no means am I coming from a place of bad faith. I want to push my peers to new heights, and I will be honest with them so they know the truth and can evolve from there.
__________

While fitting the criteria of the competition, I do not see this piece as a practical work made for performance. I have noticed multiple errors where a professional concert pianist would have a high level of difficulty playing this work; specifically "Variation 4" where you employ single note tremelos. However, they are not uncommon to use as Liszt, and Debussy used them in their music. Liszt in the Friska from "Hungarian Rhapsody no. 2" and Debussy from the Prelude "...Ce qu'a vu le vent d'ouest". In comparison, your usage of them is more difficult due to the amount of note shifts a pianist will have to do, versus the raw technique.

In a similar mindset, I do not believe the first section from measures 1-40 to be realistically playable on the piano. Continuing on, the engraving for the score concerns me heavily. The measures seem to be too small or placed too closely together throughout and in spots, like measure 128, you have two different spellings for the same note (G# and Ab). Musically, is it rather interesting and I did enjoy the theme you created. I love to write in D-minor when given the chance, and I was vibing with the "sinister" nature the key provides in your theme.

If you would like to talk more or explore these comments, I would not mind doing so. Thank you for taking the time to read this 🙂

 

Firstly, Thank you. (Why can't I add any reactions today? It was my first one today!)

Anyways, I was able to play the opening for the pianos.You just have to plainly memorize the notes for piano 1, and play chromatic notes for piano 2.

At bar 128, it meant that the sharped note should be played with a slightly more stronger accent, because written with a sharp. You see, the bass clef seems darker to me (except if the treble clef behaves like feux follets or the opening of the piece).

I really like to use tremolos. 

And again, thank you very much for the positive feedback and comments. I appreciate it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...