Jump to content

2025 Halloween Competition - DANCE FROM THE SKELETON BALL (Submission)


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello all!

I am classical pianist based in the United States and have been composing in my spare time since 2023, mainly hand writing and using MuseScore as my notation engine of choice. This post marks my first ever post and submission here on the Young Composer's Forum. If you would like to know more about me, both my website and short biography can be found on my profile!

__________
YCF HALLOWEEN SUBMISSION:
For this year's halloween competition, I created a ~5-minute long work for a Piano Quartet (Violin, Viola, Cello and Piano). This was my chamber of choice as currently, I am learning, and will be performing, Beethoven's Opus 11 Piano Trio in Bb with two other peers, and felt inspired to write something more traditional. Composed in C-minor, this work is set into Ternary Form (A-B-A') and aims to cast music for the time of Halloween. If you would like to know more about the piece, you can find more information on Page 3 in the "About" section.
 
Thank you for taking the time to view my score and consider this work for this event! 

__________
(DISCLAIMER: The Midi playback from Musescore Studio sounds a little skewed in the solo violin part, however, this setback does not object to the playability of the part.)

Edited by MK_Piano
Updated post with grammar and added new file
MP3
0:00
0:00
PDF
  • Like 6
Posted

Awesome music, and welcome!

Dude, you're fantastic. I almost went this route, kinda the dancey macabre but fun way. Loved it

Your music is very well thought out, score is clean and neat, you obviously know what you're doing. Lovely playback too, the rendering is really smooth and polished. 

We'd love to hear your feedback on some of the entrees, you sound like you have a lot of knowledge for a young age. Well done! 🙂 

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

@Thatguy v2.0

Thanks! I am a savant of music theory and put a passion into my music. I am personally picky on engraving, formatting and music structure, and if I were to go around scores, I think that'd be a bulk of my comments. If you really want to know... ask @UncleRed99. He's been on the receiving end of my comments lol

Edited by MK_Piano
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

Welcome to YC!

 

Anyways, great piece, with clear inspirations from Beethoven and some from Chopin's Polonaises. My favourite so far.

Average 9.375 Very Good.

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

10 9.5 8.5 9 10 8 10 10
  • Like 3
Posted

Here's my score: 

Average score: 9.7(very good) 

I do not think much to say on this piece. 

 

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

10 9.5 9.5 10 10 9.5 10 9
  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Kvothe said:

Here's my score: 

Average score: 8.4(above average good) 

I do not think much to say on this piece. 

 

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

10 9.5 9.5 10 10 9.5 10 9
 

Thanks for the rate! Just to clarify: Based on this table, wouldn't the average be 9.6875 and not 8.4?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, MK_Piano said:

Thanks for the rate! Just to clarify: Based on this table, wouldn't the average be 9.6875 and not 8.4?

 

Again, maths. 

Yes. I will now correct that.

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi again man, it's me, the long reply guy again! 

But this time I'm having a look at your quartet :).

How important structure is. If there's anything I love listening to that would be 100 of 100 times how apparently simple stuff gets way stronger than what one can anticipate making intelligent use of structure. What first felt like a nice but not specially remarkable rhythm and material, later came back strengthened. It's something that our grand masters of the past knew very well and I personally never get tired of it.  

This is a very solid and aesthetically beautiful (in my humble opinion) quartet which although it doesn't stand out for doing anything revolutionary, it definitely doesn't need to! It handles very well the essential elements that make it up, and if this weren't an informal competition and I were to evaluate it seriously, it would be among the best pieces submitted these days.

We have different tastes when it comes to engraving (I am not into rehearsal marks with bar numbers or big tempo indications, but I very much understand their usefulness). That aside, your score is very well engraved, again in my opinion.

Congratulations and thank you for your great submission. Best of luck and...Hope you stay around!

Kind regards,
Daniel–Ø.

  • Like 4
Posted

Hello @MK_Piano!

I like the dark opening with all low registers from the strings!

You mention Mozart in your programme notes. That G-A-B-C motive definitely reminds me of the opening of his D minor Piano Concerto K 466, as well as Beethoven's op.111 first movement. I like this light hearted dance, and the cello melody in b.13 which would later be reused in the Doloroso part.

I like the B minor and nepolitan Db major chord in the Doloroso section, as it makes the music more unsettling, combining with the triplets, and it would be great if there are more polyrhythms here, like the one in b.43 to make the music rhythmically more unsettling! Personally I would want the Doloroso section develops a bit more as I feel like the modulation to F minor is a bit too early for me. But this is subjective in my part! For b.56 I may just write the viola part as Ab-Db to show the nepolitan chord, but I know that your G#-C# would like to show the upward resolve, as well as preventing a natural sign in the next bar's D so it's ok too.

The modulation to A minor at the end makes the music brighter and I like how you vary the texture to get the music more exciting till the end!

The ensemble writing here is almost perfect. One thing I would hope for is that you will give viola a chance to play the melody in solo! I always like its distinctive timbre as it doesn't get too stressed in its high register like cello, nor too hard in notes normally played by violin's G string.

Thx for joining the forum and the competition!

Henry

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Henry Ng Tsz Kiu said:

Hello @MK_Piano!

For b.56 I may just write the viola part as Ab-Db to show the neapolitan chord, but I know that your G#-C# would like to show the upward resolve, as well as preventing a natural sign in the next bar's D so it's ok too.

The ensemble writing here is almost perfect. One thing I would hope for is that you will give viola a chance to play the melody in solo! I always like its distinctive timbre as it doesn't get too stressed in its high register like cello, nor too hard in notes normally played by violin's G string.

 

Yeah, it feels nice to have someone else notice those decisions. In all honesty, I did not realize the Viola never had the melody until I did the A-minor Modulation lol 

So, I tried a solo Viola part at the section, but I know if played live, it was going to get lost in the heavy texture at Forte. So, I doubled it with the Cello to support as the Piano was doing the bass pattern. Also, 100% correct on the enharmonic spelling in the Viola, it was purely for voice-leading purposes versus trying to imply a different harmonic function.

Thanks for the comment! 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted

What's up my boy. We've already spoken about this score privately. But I have to comment here, as well! 
I didn't mention the enjoyment of your use of the bVI chords in your transitions. Very tasteful and well placed. Pacing of the piece is very well executed. Also pleased to hear at mm.33 you found a way to make the playback work in your favor. 😉 a couple things to point out, from my perspective though. 

Your use of the term "Esultante" I feel is misplaced in this score, as a whole. That section is more reminiscent of chaos rather than "exultant," "jubilant," or "elated" (which is the definition of that term, from what I recall) which is but a small gripe, but a gripe nonetheless lol 

I also am questioning playability in some areas for Violin and Cello. I'm not a strings player, however, I would imagine some of the rhythms used in the rhythmic sections, and even in a couple areas of the melodic sections for either instrument, while they'd be physically playable, might not sound as it's written with any amount of ease. Not to say that it's not possible with practice, but for example, the Cello part, when ending a phrase in it's rhythmic areas, they're playing an eighth note followed by a sixteenth note chromatic triplet: image.png.c2636d31f39908c7db3260571e8d3ad0.png
I fear that this would come out more "muddy" than well articulated for many players, specifically being played in the lower register. Though, this is not a "problem", moreso a technicality, if we're being fair. But I digress. lol You can see my scoring chart + average score below, to conclude my thoughts on the score. Thanks for sharing, and I'm glad you decided to join us here at YCF 😉

Great work, and I know you'll keep on writing so I don't need to tell you, twice xD 

Melodies Themes Motives

Harmony Chords Textures

Form Development Structure Time

Originality Creativity

Score Presentation

Instrumentation Orchestration Playability

Execution of Given Challenge

Taste

8 8 10 6 7 6 10 10


Average score: 8.125 😉

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

@UncleRed99

I can understand some of the confusion. As this was created and submitted for this Halloween event, my original goal was to make a skeleton dance. I was explicit in conveying that in the title and the brief description of the work. For some context, yes, I did mean to use “Esultante” to convey a jubilee as you are hearing the music from this dance reach a close. We are hearing the music from this grand gala. However, what is “chaotic” to us is fun for them as the “DJ” or Host raises the energy to close the party.

To your point about the articulation in the cello, there comes a point in performance practice where you find out that articulation markings also convey bowing information. There are multiple ways to play a staccato within the string family (on or off the string staccatos). The context of the works implies that they need to lift or bounce the bow off the string and attack for the slur with another, single-bow movement. In the context of the work, they will bounce between their C and G strings respectively. 
 

In terms of blurriness of the chromatic notes? Clarity and hearing each individual note is not the intention, as it is meant to convey a little “rush” or “wisp” motion into the downbeat(s).

Thanks for the comments.

Edited by MK_Piano
Grammar and Spelling
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MK_Piano said:

@UncleRed99

I can understand some of the confusion. As this was created and submitted for this Halloween event, my original goal was to make a skeleton dance. I was explicit in conveying that in the title and the brief description of the work. For some context, yes, I did mean to use “Esultante” to convey a jubilee as you are hearing the music from this dance reach a close. We are hearing the music from this grand gala. However, what is “chaotic” to us is fun for them as the “DJ” or Host raises the energy to close the party.

To your point about the articulation in the cello, there comes a point in performance practice where you find out that articulation markings also convey bowing information. There are multiple ways to play a staccato within the string family (on or off the string staccatos). The context of the works implies that they need to lift or bounce the bow off the string and attack for the slur with another, single-bow movement. In the context of the work, they will bounce between their C and G strings respectively. 
 

In terms of blurriness of the chromatic notes? Clarity and hearing each individual note is not the intention, as it is meant to convey a little “rush” or “wisp” motion into the downbeat(s).

Thanks for the comments.

 

Fair enough. I suppose I didn't catch the underlying meaning or intent behind the notation. As you know, I was always a wind instrumentalist, not classically trained. So my interpretation of sheet music may differ from those who are classically trained. Although, I did mention that I can't see that as a "problem" and more so viewed it as a technicality. Which had no bearing on my final scoring of the piece! 

But thank you for clarifying that point 😉

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...