Should I start with traditional tonality?

I’m a 16-year-old trying to become a composer, and I’m pretty much new to this forum! I really want to express myself in more modernist idioms, but I’m still developing my technique. Right now I’m working on a traditional harmony course, and I’m at the point of cadences and simple modulations. I’ve composed several tonal pieces, including a mazurka, a sonata movement, and a late-romantic waltz.
 

I guess my question is whether I should compose many more “traditionally tonal” pieces before moving to the idioms that excite me more? If so, when is the point when I can move to non-functional harmony? Or can I just study traditional harmony on the side, but try to compose more modern-sounding music? I have already been doing this to a certain extent (my late-romantic waltz). Thanks for any suggestions! —Matthew

Hey there Matthew,

Do you have a teacher? Or do you study music on your own with online course guidance? 

My opinion is do what you want, learn what interests you, but I think it's really advantageous to continue with tonal harmony. When you learn why tonality broke down, it helps with understanding the motives atonal music is trying to achieve. 

Also, post your music if you haven't already! That'll really help with your growth, as even strangers on the internet can provide a wealth of knowledge. 

Cheers buddy

Hi Matthew. 

Here's my answer: 

It is easier to start with tonal harmony vs modern harmony.  It is probably better start with tonal, traditional harmony so you can understand modern harmony change that. 

Hello @mahler2009,

Welcome to the forum!

I couldn't agree more with @Thatguy v2.0.

11 hours ago, mahler2009 said:

I really want to express myself in more modernist idioms

What is the idioms you want to express with?

Henry