All Activity
- Past hour
-
- Today
-
-
Thanx The Choir was created to sound similar ,to the Film " In the Beginning " The Creation of the 1st Human-Prototype The Score was not created in a DAW, it was exported from the system,as a MIDI File, into the "MuseScore Studio 4" I dont like the DAWS as the " Lego-Brick concept " slowed me down to much. https://youtu.be/ao5VegZ4JD8?t=547
-
- Yesterday
-
Wieland, thank you for taking the time to comment on my work. Your interest is much appreciated. Mark
-
Hello @MJFOBOE , even if this lovely string trio is only the second of your compositions that I’m going to comment, I think that I can already recognize your personal style: Playful pieces which seem to be „easy“ on the first glance, but are well crafted and have a feeling of people talking and interacting together (the other piece I reviewed was „Mother and son“). I like the independence of the voices – each one being its own personality. And even it isn’t „strict counterpoint“, I can see how the piece is developed from a few recurring motifs making it memorable and varied.
-
Hello @Some Guy That writes Music , I enjoyed the piece, considering that a nine-voice string arrangement has the potential for an enormous richness in texture, like that of a motet. Thus, it would be great to listen it played by a large string orchestra or by a small ensemble consisting of only one instrument per voice. I like the dissonances and somewhat unexpected harmony progressions, giving the piece its unique, modern character. But I would agree with @danishali903 's comments that there are some aspects which could be improved: I think, there is potential to further enrich the texture. Even if you’ve already developed the voices independently, there are often pairs or groups of instruments with the same rhythmic pattern and the same direction in voice leading. Contrary motion in voice leading makes the dialogue between the melodic lines more interesting and, on the other hand, helps to avoid parallels (which I have not checked and I do not expect that you to have produced ones). I would also appreciate to have more suspensions. This would give you more variation in the rhythmic pattern and allows you to create smoother harmonic transitions, which would soften the dissonances somewhat (and you could then introduce even more of them…) At some points, I also preferred more rhythmic variety in the bass. Why not contrast the long, tied notes with pizzicato sections?
-
Sometimes I just sit down at the keyboard and just let my fingers go wherever they want to. Most of the time I fail to capture any of that and immediately forget what I did. Today however, I just happened to be recording and captured what I played. i thought wasn’t that bad and decided to share it. Hope you enjoy my playing around on the keys. Stream of consciousness.mp3
-
-
I've heard those before; even after writing music for 38 years, it sounds impossible to a non-pianist! Easy trick to it, I suppose.
-
Oh! Really easy scale down.
-
At the moment i am practicing to create cinematic drum tracks. My end goal is to be able to create something like All drums goes to hell by Two steps from hell. I am pretty new at this so they aren't that good yet. But i will be happy with any feedback i can get. Thanks in advance. Dragon fire.mp3 drum track 7.mp3 Drum track 9.mp3 drum track 10.mp3 drum track no 8.mp3 epic drums no 6.mp3
-
I’m excited to share my new piece: Sonata No. 23 in F-sharp major, written in binary form. It’s a charming and playful work, full of unexpected harmonic twists that give it a unique and stylish character—perhaps the most distinctive sonata I’ve written so far. I composed this piece in just a few hours spread over two days, making the creative process as spontaneous as the music itself. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did writing it—let me know what you think in the comments!WOW Wieland Handke ..............Are you Intelligent ! what a wonderful post, i shall be referring back to this regularly thank you. when a woman has a double pregnancy, its called TWINS....... so a "Twin-Melody" is a Double-Melody, know as "Polyphony". when you think of a Cave man & woman................we've come along way from Hitting a Drum with an Animal Bone......he he thanx again x https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-melody https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphony
- Last week
Measure 36.Hallo @interlect , that is a good question. Honestly, I also never heard about „Counter-Melody“ or „Twin Melody“. However, since I’ve always use counterpoint when composing, possibly I can explain something about. First of all, the “reviewers” who have concluded that this piece is not counterpoint may be somewhat surprised, since the piece has a “jazz” or “big band” feel that one doesn’t necessarily expect when looking forward to a piece performed on an organ, a piano, or perhaps by a chamber orchestra. But that kind of „style“ is not the issue. Counterpoint is not a style of music or related only with a certain era, namely the Baroque time. There is, for example, a Russian composer, Nikolai Kapustin, who wrote always in Jazz „style“, including 24 preludes and fugues in Jazz style, which – of cause – apply counterpoint. So, counterpoint is a composing technique, rather than a style: Counterpoint, or polyphonic music is all about voices that form rhythmically and melodically independent (horizontal) musical lines. When two or more such voices occur in a piece of music, they interact with each other, following certain contrapuntal rules and thus creating harmony. Since all voices are equally carriers of the melodic and rhythmic material, there is no specific melody voice and no subordinate accompaniment, for example through (vertical) chords. While singing independently, the voices do not have to be completely unrelated. Often, one voice repeats or imitates what another voice has sung before, as is the case in a canon, for example. Counterpuntal compositional technique fascinates with its efficiency in the use of thematic material. Once started with the (fugue) subject and the „accompaniment“ in the other voices (which is, in fact, no accompaniment but material being developed in interaction with the subject), there is enough material with which to compose without having to stop and reflect. To come back to your example: To me, it’s inherently a typical jazz piece based on a chord progression over which the band begins to improvise. In a chord progression, the vertical approach—that is, the chords themselves with their harmonies—is the fundamental compositional or improvisational technique. The melodic material follows these harmonies and generates the horizontal lines as a result of them, rather than as their original idea. And even though your two brass sections interact with each other in a kind of melodic dialogue, I get the impression that they are engaged in a “playful competition” to see who can deliver the better improvisation over the underlying jazz harmonies, rather than developing a “subject” or thematic material. There’s nothing wrong with that, and I really liked the piece, but it is also for me no counterpoint, and the other classifications like “Twin melody” or “Counter-Melody” (which, as far as I know, aren’t clearly defined terms) seem to be an attempt to express in a single word what I’ve tried to explain in more detail.They are, are you talking about arpeggios?Fran_08 joined the communityIt would be really cool to hear a large string orchestra play this piece. A couple of comments: It's a bit static and on the short side. I think more development of the melodic material, or even an another theme (that's a little more "active") can help with that. There is a lot of unconvincing, but slightly interesting voice leading and harmonic clashes going on. Some of the transitional chords really random and don't set up the next phrase like they should (most prominent example is bars 39-40 going into 41). It would it make more interesting to have the lower strings have a more active part than just holding on to half notes. The violins don't always have to play the melody, share it with the others! Try to be more creative in writing for parts that are accompanying the melody.I just happened upon his work because it came up in my YouTube feed. He really seems to have been a good composer, and I will be checking into his music. I wouldn't be surprised if I wrote something and was influenced by his technique. Yasushi Akutagawa - Wikipedia Yasushi Akutagawa 芥川也寸志 - Triptyque for String Orchestra (1953) (sheet music)Hello This piece is fantastic. It sounds very modern in many ways: dissonances, harmonies, dense textures, etc. But it retains a Baroque spirit. Bravo.I like this, Tristan! As good as anything I can do for piano. You have followed me for long enough to know that I can't even play piano, but are those rapid chromatic glissandos possible? Maybe they are, some special technique; never really looked into it. I write very conservatively for piano.
