Leaderboard

@Wieland Handke Thank you for taking time to listen and provide such thoughtful feedback! I liked the idea of making preludes in the style of rotating circle of fifths, but with my own twist. For example, the 3rd prelude being both the G Major and E Minor prelude (like two mini-preludes combined into a small "whole" prelude), and playing around with ending pieces on 9ths, (so B Major in 9th prelude ends on B#, leading to the C# minor ending, which was planned from the 1st prelude). A lot of this was written with a "let's see where this goes" mentality. I like the feeling of writing music as though it's part of the creation process. A lot of times when I write music, it feels like I take the first step or two, and then the music (which is starting to form it's own "person") makes its own suggestions of where it wants to go, and back and forth, until it's finished. (And you're right, I really need to add a few clefs to certain ledger lines so it's easier to read!) @Grant Weep Thank you as well, for giving your thoughts and feedback! I like adding different levels of "spice" to my music. One day, I want to write some over-the-top spicy music, but I find it really hard to do so, because I want to write music that's both accessible and deep, and the more spice that's added, the more difficult it is for it to be accessible as well. That's a challenge that's on my to-do list to attempt. I actually can play these pieces! If I practiced, anyway. I haven't bothered to perform any of my own pieces -- it takes a great deal of work and repetition. But these are in my technical ability, yes. I occasionally do give descriptive names to my pieces, but these days, usually they are just given generic names. But sometimes I do have certain specific inspirations, ideas, or stories as to why a piece got created, or it's written the way it is. For example, I was having terrible writer's block as early as the 4th prelude. So, here I was, trying to get literally anything going -- making a series of preludes, and I'm already stumped at the 4th one, with nothing rattling around in my noggin. After a while, I thought, "what about musically portraying "beating head against wall?" So, super loud, brick wall octaves buffeted by crashing wave arpeggio figure? It felt weirdly right, and honest, and I just went with it. I mean, that isn't what the music's "about", but it's what inspired its existence. 5th prelude, I saw a cat on Instagram named Merv who could summon the demon "Bagagwa", and it amused me so much that it was the inspiration for the 5th prelude. Ms 8, lyrics are, "Who will sum-mon Ba-gag-wa?!" Cracks me up every time I hear it. 8th prelude, I started thinking of key words that I wanted to portray and bring to life. So, the 8th one was "fury". The 9th prelude, the key words were "space" and "void".

Thank you @Grant Weep for your thoughtful and detailed response to this music! I really appreciate the time and care you took in giving your feedback. I agree that the first movement is bananas! And yes I do enjoy bending the rules of harmony and stretching the ear a bit, but within the context of classical harmony and form. I feel like that sort of exercise sets expectations up in the listener’s ear (they expect to hear clean cadences and traditional harmony), which allows me to defy those expectations and take the piece in a new direction. I don’t do it just to troll the listener, but instead to try and make a unique sound. I love Beethoven’s harmony and form, and I want to play in that space, but without just impersonating Beethoven. I tried here to make those forms and harmonies new, but without completely obliterating them. Was it successful? Yes and no. I allowed too many ideas to come at the listener too quickly, hence the piece starts off bananas. But I’d like to try this exercise again in the next sonata and see if I can tighten it. My tendency (in music and in this paragraph) is to try and say too much. Thank you again for your kind words, and for your time! The adjectives you use to describe the music are spot on, and really make me feel like something worthwhile was accomplished here. I appreciate you!

Hello, Sometimes the problem with writing so much music is that it takes so long to listen to it all. I have been listening to the your pieces gradually in the last few weeks while at work to try to take it all in. I think others have made more specific comments, I'll just say a few things about overall impressions. Maybe there are more thoughts after...but I think when you've created something like this - it sort of takes on a life of it's own. I mean from the most fundamental level, I find your music interesting to listen to and I enjoyed listening to it multiple times. So in that regard, from a subjective perspective, I am a fan. I dig your style. The opening notes from your first prelude sort of says: This is Classical music, but the chords are gonna be a little spicy at times. Which is great. Listening to your music feels familiar enough for me, but also exciting enough through the nice harmonies and ideas you got going on. It's clear that you have put a lot of thought into it all. The pacing works great. I'm thinking that the 10 pieces need to be played in this order. So the second thought is...can you actually play these compositions yourself? It gets very virtuosic at points. I would absolutely love to hear a recorded version of yourself playing it. I think there is only so much that comes through in these simulated recordings. The third thought is that you clear have a style that shows through. Prelude 5 goes a bit off on a tangent stylistically from my ears, but I mean I think I hear a distinct "SergeOfArniVillage" style if that makes sense. My favorite is probably Prelude 7. The right hand accompaniment that you do throughout is so nice. Really tickles the right places in my brain, if that makes sense. While you have the "loud" songs and the "soft" songs. I think I prefer the more quite and contemplative ones. I also enjoyed Prelude 9 very much. Probably my second favorite. I'm a big fan of adding descriptive titles to your pieces. I totally get if that's not your thing, but it would be so amazing to hear your own thoughts on what inspired you and what you were sort of going for when writing these pieces.

Hello @SergeOfArniVillage, That is an exciting post and really a „project“ with a bunch of pieces worth to be reviewed! So, first, to get an overview, I have taken a first look at the scores to see how the preludes are organized. Prelude No. 1 (I) – C major (but ends in C sharp!) Prelude No. 2 (II) – A minor Prelude No. 3 (III) – G major or E minor Prelude No. 4 (V) – D major (but ends in E?) Prelude No. 5 (VI) – B minor Prelude No. 6 (VII) – A major Prelude No. 7 (VIII) – F sharp minor (but ends?) Prelude No. 8 (IX) – E major (but ends with five flats?) Prelude No. 9 (XI) – B major Prelude No. 10 (X) – C sharp minor Very interesting, the tonality of the pieces is not as obvious in every case, but I suspect, that the preludes are intended to be all in a different key and organized around the circle of fifth (the same way as Chopin’s 24 preludes or Shostakovich’s 24 preludes and fugues - the roman numbers I inserted above were the numbering according to that scheme) and therefore my first question, do you plan to complete the cycle to all 24 pieces/keys? Now, I’m going to listen the single pieces. Prelude No. 1 Yes, it starts slowly with a C major chord, but immediately asks three consecutive harmonic „questions“. They are developed further until a climax in fortissimo but retain unanswered with a finishing C#m(add9) chord. A great overture which makes curious what will happen next, after the curtain rises. Prelude No. 2 The overture continues! But now there is more movement, as the heavy chords are accompanied by driving sixteenth notes. Prelude No. 3 Although it begins in G major, I am now certain that this is the E minor prelude. And that makes sense, because it provides the first moment of calm in the cycle. With that in mind, I’m certain you should insert another piece (between No. 2 and No. 3) in G major—as a “heroic opening to the opera”—following the first two “introductory” pieces, which have built up tension that now needs to be resolved. Prelude No. 4 Now it gets louder again. The prelude reminds me somewhat at Shostakovich’s prelude No. 6 in B minor from its op. 87. However, you interestingly achieved the feeling of a „French overture“ not by double dotted notes but only by accentuating and phrasing your semiquavers! Just now – after 100 bars - I had the impression that it could become somewhat too repetitive, but you’ve presented the right answer to that feeling with your surprisingly ending of the piece with „staccatissimo strikes“ in mm. 101-103 and unexpected resolving to Em7. Prelude No. 5 As surprising the former prelude ends, the new one starts in its opening six measures. But now starts the fun! (More than) an entire bar in rest, and than we have a ragtime which continues to change into a „free jazz“! I really enjoyed your „walking bass“ whereas I really could imagine a Jazz trio on the stage (with piano, double bass and drums). A fantastic piece, perhaps my favorite from the ten ones. Prelude No. 6 Calming down with the A major prelude with the opening F doublesharp diminished 7th chords. And even more in the Adagio section with its „ethereal mood“. But the calm is deceptive as the drama begins in bar 33 (or even earlier with the first fortissimo in bar 28). Interesting contrasts throughout the entire piece as well as another surprising ending, as the finally reached A major chord is „disturbed“ or „spiced“ by an A sharp! Prelude No. 7 A good companion with the previous one, both share the contrast between „drama“ and „ethereal feeling“, but this one in a somewhat more „pleasant“ way. The combination of bass-heavy chords and pearl-like runs in the higher register lends the piece a certain beauty despite its dissonances. The deceptive „endings“ (in mm. 41) and the rests (in mm. 18-19) arise a sense of tension and curiosity about what will happen next. Prelude No. 8 Now we are back in a realm which I would describe as „Jazz“ (in a wider sense). Thriving rhythms and syncopation paired with complex chords. It somewhat reminds me at the brilliant preludes (and fugues) or concert etudes of Nikolai Kapustin, the famous Jazz-pianist-composer. Haha, and in mm. 53-53 the chords repeated eight times (from ff to fff) remind me at the famous eightfold repeated ninth in the left hand of measure 35 of Bach’s B major Prelude from WTC2 (BWV 892), so that we have even a reference there. Prelude No. 10 I changed the listening order, since in my imagination to follow the circle of fifth as arrangement scheme, we should now come to C sharp minor: Although the prelude features various, contrasting textural means, such as heavy chords, arpeggio runs and triplets, the „harmonic kaleidoscope“ of the previous preludes is now calmed down to a more tonal approach (as I see no accidentals at the ultimate chord, while being towered by a ninth). Prelude No. 9 The cycle (so far) ends with a gentle or tranquil piece with pleasant – and sometimes dissonant – chords, thus finishing the arch to the Prelude No. 1. But the curiosity for more prevails: After the expected ending in B major (over a pedal tone), you could not hesitate to create suspense or tension with the ultimate chord which leads us to the (possibly) next piece in G sharp (minor) ... Final words. It was a fun to take a closer look and to listen at your preludes and I’m very curious if that cycle would be continued – especially as my „project“ (it is somewhat a „life-time project“) is to compose 24 preludes and fugues (fortunately more than the half is already accomplished). My thoughts or „review“ is merely subjective, and I did not analyze the scores thoroughly to „find nitpicks“. The only thing I discovered is that there were some notes I am not able (or willing) to read due to the amount of ledger lines … Great work! Wieland