Leaderboard

The idea for this composition was inspired by @MK_Piano, after he sent me some footage of himself improvising in C minor on piano. I asked him if I could write something inspired by what he played, and was graciously allowed to do so. The piece utilizes a steady quarter note / eighth note moving rhythm and melody that symbolizes the passing of time during, and the emotional feelings felt in periods of contemplation, longing, rumination, and/or sorrowful reflection. Although, I feel as though it may be a bit too repetative, despite having variation in both rhythm, chord voicing, chord progression choice, including a modulation towards the end. I'm seeking to build upon the ideas I have in this score, more effectively. Any suggestions are welcome :) UnreadLetters.mp3 Unread Letters.pdf

Thank you for the clarification :) I will consider it moving forward and update with any changes!

There is a key change but, I was meaning mostly the change of tessitura and texture (in that particular instance, besides changing the key, you leave large gaps between the accompaniment and the melody, which contrasts with the previous measures in which the G staff was clustered with notes). What I meant around 1:50 was not a modulation, but rather a change in tessitura for the melody. I might be wrong, but the same melody is played for the first time around the 00:59 mark, which, at the same time, is a variation of the main melody with which the piece starts. As a result, while my ear does not ask for a key change (the initial Cmin chords from m.34 sound perfectly nice to me), when the G5 sounds, yet once more, somehow my ear is tired of hearing the melody always in that range. I think, at that point, it would really make it much fresher playing the melody an octave higher or even in a bass (with the melody played below the Cmaj accompaniment chord), starting it in G6 or G3. For example, this is a fast draft I made of the initial measures when played an octave higher. Since the melody has already being played in around G5 for a few times, it might make it fresher going up an octave like this. The melody has some fast notes at times, so it cannot be played in octaves easily, but something like this might work at times. octave_melody.mp3 Hope it helps!

Thank you very much dear Henry. I hadn't seen your beautiful comment. I really appreciate your feedback which shows an attentive listening to details. Unfortunately, I lack the time to participate more in the forum but I will try to keep myself a little more informed of the news. Thank you again!

Hi @JorgeDavid, Below is my review of your waltz: Form: There are two district different sections that have their own character with the composition. The tonal centers and relations between is not common. I feel this would fit with in middle romantic period. I am not sure about the dramatic pause at the end of melodic phrase. It is rather sudden and jarring. It disrupts the natural flow of piece. Harmony and texture: There is a high sense of chromatism with in waltz. I wonder about how those harmonies are prepared and resolved correctly. The bass line fits with in the standard waltz type pattern in first section and breaks away in the middle section. Thematic material: A couple things to note: the ending of each melodic phrase with chromatic note seems unsettling. G-F#-A. While there is a sense of melodic sequence with each phrase, it is hard to detect the general structure (sentence, period, or hybrid). This was original piece and was truly creative. With in my musical taste, I like to hear more music like this. I.e. find a way to create a natural flow with each phrase. think about what I said about structure and form and how the works with the underlaying the harmony. Otherwise, you good start. Kvothe.

This is really lovely! I especially love the melodic ideas. However, I agree that it feels a little repetitive at times, particularly before 3:22. I listened without the score, so I can't give much feedback on the harmony itself. From a listener's perspective, I think the piece could benefit from a few more changes in texture here and there. Nothing too obvious, so as not to disrupt the contemplative mood. For example, I really loved the change of texture at 3:22. More moments like that, might help reduce the sense of repetition while still maintaining its contemplative flow. In particular, at 1:52, I found myself wanting to hear the melody an octave higher (perhaps doubled in octaves). As it stands, it presents a variation of the main theme in the same register, and my ears were asking for a change in tessitura at that point. This is really beautiful and an orchestral version would be so beautiful too! Orchestrating it would also give you lots of chances to add variety with the instrumental colors. Thanks for sharing!

Hello @Kvothe , thank you so much for all the feedback and glad you enjoyed the piece! You are right, I had not realized until you pointed it out. I decided to change those measures so I modified m.14 and similar measures so now the transition to the contrasting section of A is done without stopping the waltz rhythmic flow. I experimented a little bit with the harmony. In general I am happy with most progressions except for m.7~9 where I do the following harmonic progression: Db7 --> Bbaug/D --> Ebmin. It was a solution I came across for moving from Db7 to Ebmin while having an enharmonic common tone (F#-Gb) in the melody. Yes, I agree. Since I composed it as a short piece I tried to have fun with the main melody (not trying to write sentence, period or hybrid, which I did in the B section instead) but it came out too Jazzy. I do like it but I think it gets too chromatic too early (so I like it the main theme much more during the reprise than at the beginning, once the ear got used to it). I think it is okay for a short piece like this but I am trying to learn ways to "smooth" the way to chromatism in themes like this one. Thank you so much for all the feedback!

Hello everyone, My co-founder and I have spent the past while building Ivory (https://ivory-app.com), a tool for converting piano recordings into editable notation, and I wanted to introduce it here because this community is exactly who we built it for: people who compose at the keyboard. The problem we set out to address is a practical one. Composers who work at the piano routinely capture ideas as audio , a phone recording, a quick DAW take , and then face the slow task of transcribing their own playing by ear before they can develop the material. Manual transcription of dense voicings, fast passagework, or pedalled textures can take longer than writing the piece itself. Ivory is built specifically for that step. What it does Converts a piano recording (MP3 or similar) into notation in the browser : nothing to install. Uses a model trained specifically for piano, rather than a general-purpose audio-to-MIDI converter. Produces editable output, exportable to MusicXML (Sibelius, MuseScore, Dorico), MIDI (any DAW), and PDF. The intended workflow: record an idea, transcribe it in Ivory, then export to your notation software or DAW and compose from a working draft rather than a blank page. Why we focused on piano Piano is one of the harder instruments to transcribe automatically: overlapping voices, sustain pedal blurring note boundaries, fast runs, and up to ten simultaneous notes. General-purpose tools tend to struggle with exactly these cases. By narrowing the scope to piano, we handle chords, fast runs, and pedalling considerably better than the broader tools we benchmarked against. Honest limitations Piano-focused , not intended for full multi-instrument or orchestral arrangements. The output is a first draft; expect to correct some rhythms, re-bar passages, and make voicing/enharmonic decisions yourself. Free tier is capped at one minute of audio per transcription (unlimited number of transcriptions) , enough to evaluate properly on real material. We would genuinely value feedback from composers here, both on transcription quality and on how it fits your existing notation workflow. Happy to answer questions in this thread.

This is very awesome to hear! Apologies for not conversing in French, as I’m sure it’d be more comfortable for you. It is my opinion that the idea of a musical is no where to be found in the sample you provided. I think it both safer and easier if you work your way up to it instead. If you have not written for solo instruments or chamber/ small ensembles, then trying to take the complexity of a musical, ballet, or opera is not going to benefit you. It’s similar to this metaphor: If a child just learned to write and comes to you to say, “I want to write a research paper!” You might say “that’s a good goal, but you need to do these steps first.” Those who’ve just taken to a skill and are now striving to do the complex works in that genre will give you great challenge. Regardless of the actual notes on the page in this post, consider starting small and writing simpler works. Simpler works that focus on your use of harmony and melody. Something to do that is exercising your skill without having the brain challenge of a large ensemble. Most western musicals will only have 6-15 musicians in local communities and more often than not, it may be one or two brass players switching instruments. So, try writing a brass trio with Bass-Trombone, French Horn and Trumpet. That way you can expand different octaves and still be in territory you know as a brass player.