Leaderboard

Thanks for the comments! In short, we'll see what happens with it. It something I will keep for later, but am unsure the direction I want to take it (Final form, duration, etc.) The main thing that is stopping me is inspiration specifically. While the summer, I am still rather busy and easily distracted currently. To your point about the note duration: It's more-so due to the computer. In performance/ final copy, I'd change it to a staccato and hopefully imply it's just meant to be the landing point of the run.

Unexpected crescendo! It bought me. Not that much the più mosso, but it's still good, yet I feel it could be extended, and each time I listen to it I am more and more convinced, maybe a repeated section or something else playing with the material you have already put over the table would not hurt. That there are no measure numbers is a bit painful to me, but I'll use an image: These notes duration don't convince me too much, specially the first time they appear: I'm not 100% sure why but it's either that the attack of the computer performance that sounds too plain or something else. I think I have little more useful feedback this time. Great job, MK! Best regards, Daniel–Ø.

Hello Everyone! After a brief hiatus from the forum for a much needed vacation and music-recharge, I am back home and beginning to try out new ideas for chamber pieces. I have written a lot of music for large ensemble and wish to dial it back down to chamber and solo music over the course of 2026. The first part in this is to showcase an idea I felt passionate about a few weeks ago. As I began to write it out this week, I feel the flame has kindled and I may not finish/ expand upon it later as I have a lot of ideas I want to explore now in other places. This Fantasie is not as extensive as the classical and baroque styles, however it's a fantasie in the sense of my improvisation with the string quartet. The only thing I wrote down was the first four bars of melody, everything else was what I made in the moment and over the last few days. Let me know what you think and as always, thanks for viewing this post! AUDIO-Fantasie in F#-minor.mp3 SCORE_Fantasie in F#-minor.pdf

Excellent 🗿. Can't help you much with the inspiration thing, but it's a great start. I'll follow the topic in case you drop some news!

Hello, I posted an earlier iteration of this work some time ago. A lot has since formed. The general structure of the first movement is complete; I still intend to vary the recapitulation somewhat as I prefer to not simply repeat the second subject verbatim. But it is more or less done. I have also made a start on the second movement. This movement has a slightly unusual disposition and is on the way for becoming an ambitious piece with its emerging structure in mind. I am posting here in advance of completion to gauge people's feelings about the musical ideas. Perhaps if anyone has suggestions I would love to hear perspectives. Or even if you like it, that helps to say too. Composing is otherwise an activity for solitude! Second movement is @ 05:40. Thanks! Markus Symphony in A (Draft).mp3 Symphony in A (Draft).pdf

Oh, how I am lull'd into the wonderous era, which is Classical orchestral music! All I have to say is, this work is pure beauty. I can listen to this during my entire 6-hour drive from Northern to Southern California. Don't change a thing about it.

Well, it's been so long since I was last here! I hope this community has been well since. I’m looking for some nice detailed peer feedback on my first Tone Poem, Myst o' Foryst a Spryng Nyte. It is a 5-part programmatic work written for a large woodwind/brass configuration, percussion ensemble, and features a prominent chamber core of Viola, Double-Bass, and Piano. (My "Alto Piano Trio" ensemble) I would be nicely interested in your thoughts on the orchestration, the pacing of the sections, and how you perceive the overall structural architecture as you listen along with the score. Please tell me of your stylistic impressions of this piece! (Note: this is a computer generated audio RENDER; not a live performance. Some of the techniques were lost in translation when it rendered, so it wouldn't sound correct. This is ESPECIALLY true of the audio files IIa and IIIa. If in a moment something sound so "wrong" and "off" in any of these audios, please rely on what is written on the page.) Thank you for your time and ear! Myst o 'Forest a Spryng Nyte (Composition) - 2nd edition - Audio portion I - meas. 1-149.mp3Myst o 'Forest a Spryng Nyte (Composition) - 2nd edition - Audio portion IIa - meas. 150.mp3Myst o 'Forest a Spryng Nyte (Composition) - 2nd edition - Audio portion IIb - meas. 151-223.mp3Myst o 'Forest a Spryng Nyte (Composition) - 2nd edition - Audio portion IIIa - meas. 224-236.mp3Myst o 'Forest a Spryng Nyte (Composition) - 2nd edition - Audio portion IIIb - meas. 237-275.mp3 A. Chen - Myst o' Foryst a Spryng Nyte - 000 - FULL SCORE (with Conductor's Rhythmic ref).pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGSReFcs4Xs

Hello! I have completed a first listen and looked over the score. I hope to do a deeper dive and analyze the score thoroughly, and the following are my initial thoughts. Very much classical style, and quite refreshing to hear something in that style again. Check your engraving. Over the entire score, you have rests with dynamic markings. Page layout can be bigger or staves made smaller. At least 4 measures per page. There is key information missing from the score. If anything, the number of instruments as well as copyright information. You just say "Flute, Oboe, Clarinet," however, do you intend for more than 1 player for this part? Between the two movements, in Musescore, you can add a "SYSTEM BREAK" which will end the piece and add a pause after a double bar line. On the next page, it will list the full instrument parts again. (in the layout palette) With the literal music, there is more play you can do with the structure or in your accompaniment parts I think. 5-minutes for a classical symphony is on the shorter side and you can mess with the idea of a repeat after the exposition and utilize a 1st and 2nd ending to propel yourself into the development. It's not a "double exposition" per-say, however very common for the music of the time.

A magnificent and delightful fugue. The string quartet is phenomenal here.

Hi @Fugax Contrapunctus ! I concur with Jordan! I think this fugue is one of your best! I especially like the ending. It doesn't overwhelm the listener with overactive counterpoint. Concerning the portamento I'll once again quote what @Alex Weidmann taught me in a previous post: Thanks for sharing!

This is a beautiful fugue, well-developed and carefully crafted such that each voice has its "time to shine." The voice leading is impeccable! Honestly, I don't have any critiques to offer, just wanted to applaud your efforts here. (I do have a comment on the recording: it sounded like the violins were on constant portamento. I'm not sure if that was intended but it was a little off-putting to me.) Happy composing! Best, Jordan