pateceramics

You have a very sweet voice, and it was very fun seeing the way you had labeled sections of your piano part to get a bit of insight into how you think as you write. I do the same thing on my scores while they are in progress. Lots of little notes to self in the margins about what might come next, or other possibilities if I decide I don't like the current one. The most obvious way to shrink the range would be some key changes for either the highest or lowest vocal sections. You are writing in a style where that would fit in very smoothly.

I'm always a fan of the minor and the modal, and agree with the rest of the room that the surprise C# is a particularly nice moment! If I had one wish, I think it would be nice to play around with something every so slightly different in the left hand the third time through bar one and two instead of doing an exact repeat of that material. We've gone on such a journey by that point, that to evolve, just by a note or two so the listener wonders what has changed, might be interesting to play with. This is really wonderful, and Henry's playing is very tender with excellent phrasing and use of rubato. Bravo to you both!

Thanks Henry! Yes, this piece was all about word painting to tell the story, so we start off stuffy and formal, like a formal business letter, and then are surprised with creepy, agitated eighth notes and a spider. My main challenge was trying to make the piece feel cohesive, since there isn't a strict melody or even a single short motif that holds it together. What does repeat are some textures: anxious eighth note sections for the piano at m. 13 and 47, and striding up by quarter note thirds and fourths at m.18 and 52 (the second time fancied up with an added octave and then some dotted eighth rhythms. Hopefully the final result isn't too chaotic. Or is just chaotic enough for suddenly realizing you are holding a live, struggling spider in your hand. Thanks for your thoughts!

Fun! I wonder if it would make a cleaner score to change the meter and tempo in some places instead of having so many -uplets. For example, from measure 71 to the end, you have nothing but triplets in the violin part. They are never set up in opposition to a duple, so you don't absolutely have to have triplets there. Instead, you could just write that section in a 6/8 meter or a 12/8 meter, make all the triplets into eighth notes, the quarter notes into dotted quarter notes, and the half notes into dotted half notes, and then use a tempo change to get the speed to match the section that came before. It would sound exactly the same, but might look a little more intuitive on the page to performers. I like the brass interjections too!

That is definitely a NICE sound set and I like your harmonies very much. It may break convention a bit (I'm not a theorist, so I'll leave that to others), but it seems very singable. Bravo!

An epistolary work for choir with piano accompaniment. And yes, I did pluck a little clump of dog hair out of a box I was mailing that wriggled and turned out to be a small spider. The spider was released back into the basement, which I'm sure it and the person receiving the box were both grateful for. Thanks for taking a listen! My dear Sir, It may please you to know that this box does not contain a spider. A bit of fluff, pinched out 'twixt thumb and finger, pushed back in desperate protest, unspooling thread-fine legs, and we saw each other face to face, both equally surprised, and so I send your order and a reminder from the spider, who was not mailed to California, that when the hand of Fate plucks you up, beat with your tiny fist, and sometimes the grip relaxes, and Fortune herself will stare in shock at your small soul looking up.

Harvard's Ferris Choral Fellows, directed by Carson Cooman, Harvard's Composer in Residence, were kind enough to use this piece in a Morning Prayer service at Memorial Church. They sang the a cappella SATB version of this piece, so I thought I would share the recording here. Enjoy!

Sometimes I put things away for a while. Sometimes I don't come back to them because they really weren't working, but something else will. Oh, well. There's always the next one... 🙂

Do you have music in the works for this one, Brianna? It looks like a good start!

My piece is more serious in tone, but I do like PDQ Bach. "Found a peanut!" Least expected opening line of an opera ever. 🙂

I've been going through older pieces and making multitrack recordings of them with myself singing all the parts. Hopefully this provides a better sense of the piece, even with an alto singing the bass line, and some resulting sound distortion from Garageband's transpose feature...

Gotcha... You could just add some accents to indicate where the strong beats are when they contradict the meter, since your music isn't following the meter in the way people assume. You can also group notes together with brackets over the top of the bars. Some editors/composers do that to show a hemiola, so people would understand what you meant. And don't worry, I believe you that you can see the video just fine. I've got particularly terrible eyesight. But I'm not the only person who does, so if you can figure out a way to get fewer bars on the screen at once, so everything is bigger, that would probably be helpful. 🙂

I like your "Holy Spirit" but I think the explanatory note at the beginning is a bit too much. You ask about professional looking scores? To look professional, assume professionalism on the part of your musicians. You might write easy parts that can be put together without a lot of rehearsal time, but any choir should understand a simple "stagger breaths throughout" without further explanation on your part. The conductor/director can explain what that means if any choir members are very new to singing. I'm not sure about the direction to take this piece out of time like Gregorian chant. The accompaniment is very metrical, except for the first few bars, and as such will impose a strict rhythm on the singers. Did you just mean for that instruction to apply to the first few bars? If so, then indicate where strict tempo resumes. If you meant for the whole piece to be a bit loose-y goose-y then a direction for "rubato" here and there may better achieve what you are looking for while keeping accompanist, conductor, and choir together. Cheers! Sounds nice!

The 1080 resolution is still not enough for me to be able to see your score clearly with my middle aged eyeballs. I'd recommend making your videos with fewer bars visible at once so the notes and text are bigger for people viewing on a laptop screen instead of a large desktop monitor if you want them to use the videos as a promotional tool to encourage purchase of your sheet music. Certainly sounds nice, but I'm too blind to see it to give more detailed feedback! You can also post a pdf of the score and a sound file for people to use here to review your work. 🙂

Very interesting stuff, Luis, I'm sorry I'm late to the party to comment! This sort of exploration is exactly the sort of thing that composition software is good for. Means you don't have to retune a whole piano to find out what it would sound like. An excellent use of modern resources to imagine ancient sounds! The introduction is beautiful and a little unnerving, and the section that begins around measure 25 is just a strange but confident loveliness. What an interesting sound world you have brought us to!