Jump to content

Composing at the Desk vs. on an Insturment


PSaun

Recommended Posts

I usually figure out the melody of the piece at the piano, and if I have time, I write out other parts and see if they make resonance at certain points (I like Eric Whitacre CHORDS not his style of composing)

But if I'm at a desk, I'll go through every chord and scale I've used at different parts of the piece, so that I can make it contrast more as I move through.

^^^^^^^^^^^

I don't do that, however, if I don't have the melody figured out. Otherwise, I'll just refine it at the desk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither. I use the computer because writing by hand is too tedious for me. Plus cut-paste is a godsend. So often I write something then decide I want to put something in between measures A and B, which means erasing measure B, putting in the new part, then remembering what I had originally. Or I decide I want to transpose something. Bah, now I have to rewrite it a tone higher. All the work that goes into actually writing this all out impedes my thought process that led to making that decision in the first place. At the computer I can make changes in a snap and still have time left over to second guess or advance.

I physically can't write at the desk as you define it. If worst comes to worst I use my voice as reference to make sure what I wrote is how I hear it. If I'm getting really frustrated, I use my recorder (the flute, not the electronic device... ). If it's a polyphonic piece, sometimes I get fed up and check it on the keyboard. My ideal setting is a table set up such that I can be seated at the piano, improvise something, turn around on the piano bench, and write it on the desk. Since I'm lazy, I'll stay in that position and keep writing until I absolutely need to turn around and use the piano again.

That just seems really lazy. Maybe you should get better at writing and organization

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?! I wouldn't think that most of the work comes out in the prewriting..

The thing is, I don't make a distinction. Often-times the melodic/rhythmic content is the first thing that comes, and then I have to spend months hashing out the texture or structure. Sometimes I know the structure and orchestration for months before applying actual melodic content in the very last step. It's a constant back and forth, working out, restructuring, re-thinking, re-evaluating, developing, abandoning, sketching...

What you guys call the "pre-writing" is, to me just "writing"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to be at the piano in order to write more complex phrase work. Also if I'm first starting a song, I tend to work faster at the piano. However, when I write at the desk I tend to get my best stuff out because I write what looks good on the screen and I'm usually right... It's harder to write what looks good on the keyboard because what looks good on the keyboard to me tends to be too generic or makes no sense at all, it's hard to explain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, I don't make a distinction. Often-times the melodic/rhythmic content is the first thing that comes, and then I have to spend months hashing out the texture or structure. Sometimes I know the structure and orchestration for months before applying actual melodic content in the very last step. It's a constant back and forth, working out, restructuring, re-thinking, re-evaluating, developing, abandoning, sketching...

What you guys call the "pre-writing" is, to me just "writing"

Oh oh.... I get it now. It's just writing, not pre-writing. I'll agree on that. :)

I tend to get melody and rhythm at the same time... but not orchestration. I do that after I work it out on the piano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, I don't make a distinction. Often-times the melodic/rhythmic content is the first thing that comes, and then I have to spend months hashing out the texture or structure. Sometimes I know the structure and orchestration for months before applying actual melodic content in the very last step. It's a constant back and forth, working out, restructuring, re-thinking, re-evaluating, developing, abandoning, sketching... What you guys call the "pre-writing" is, to me just "writing"

Everyone knows ''writing music'' is a too static thing to say to describe the music creation process of you jazz cats, you guys are just too down to earth and rustic to say ''oh i'm just imagining and conceptualizing some music'' ;) ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the above may be especially true for many Jazz composers, this is by no means a unique Jazz thing. The point is that in most composers' work processes, there is such a thing as "writing notes on paper", and there is such a thing as composing without writing notes on paper, and often those two things overlap a lot and are not in a strict temporal order. So reducing it to "conceptualizing music" would be just as much a simplification as saying "writing music", so many just stick to the term "writing" to encompass all of it. (Add to that that many steps that have nothing to do with writing notes may still involve writing. A form plan, a textual description of certain sounds, etc. are just as much "written music" as notes on staff lines.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...