December 2, 20169 yr I was shocked listening to some kind of canon from the Renaissance. They use polyrhythm extensively. So I tried... This little canon works this way: Two parts (8 + 8 measures). The middle voice and the bottom voice are in 5/4. The middle runs twice faster. The upper voice is the same than the bottom one but in 7/8. The gaps when one voice finishes earlier than others (very few gaps, indeed) are in free counterpoint. I like the result, romantic and impressionistic with mild dissonances.
December 6, 20169 yr I feel like maybe it's better with instruments that don't have such an instantaneous envelope height. A lot melding that needs to be done with this and stringed instruments would be a better fit in my opinion. I was okay with the polyrhythm in the first section, but it seemed more like a gimmick in the second. I think the more involved the counter-rhythm can be, the better it is, just because it establishes itself as present, rather than comes in to interject. It sounds pretty nice, but there should be a bit more edge to it in my opinion. Cheers!
December 6, 20169 yr Author Yes I agree that it would sound better with strings or similar. And yes, I wrote it with no manipulation. I mean, the voices are strictly canonic. Justo a starting opina for something, it's short and althoughbit is complete, it has some potential. Those ancient masses from the Renaissance period written entirily in this mind of canon aré incredible.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.