All Activity

Yes, you're dead right about that. Will take most of those staccato marks out in my next revision. Glad you liked it otherwise! I created the piece in sporadic bursts of rapid composition over the course of three months or so, with long breaks inbetween. Each time I came back to it, the character of the next section I composed was always different from the previous section. At one point it was sounding a bit too saccharine sweet: so I decided to introduce an octatonic scale, then played with dissonance to make a more contemporary sounding ending. Didn't really analyse the tone clusters I made, just experimented with lots of copying and pasting between instruments, and moved pitches around. Think the results were quite Stravinskian. I don't expect it'll ever be played by a real orchestra: so not sure I'm going to bother with a proper score? Also: I found this cool video on You Tube of what life may be like on Tau Ceti f:

I actually like those triplet gestures. You can't hear them very clearly in the mix; but they create a blurry effect that I enjoy.

Peter, many thanks for listening! The key modulations were designed to move the music up a gear: so it would ramp up tension. The final chord is intended to be a little surprise at the end, and it just felt right to me; although it's a suspension. ("We Are The Champions" by Queen ends on a suspension as well: so it is a device that's been used occasionally in pop/rock.) I did try using E major; but it didn't sound as good to my ear. Can't quite remember; but I think the development arc of the piece was partly improvised; though I added the opening drone later. The podcaster seems happy with it anyway; though I have to enhance the bass somehow (maybe with EQ).

I will survive.

Btw, there was a national level blackout in my country so I had all the day to write this!!! lmaoo

Vals I.mp3 Hiii! I had to turn in an assignment for my classic harmony class, my teacher asked for a 'chopinesque' waltz and I wrote this! I tried to pour some of my personal style too. Besides, this style is completely new for me (you'll notice that in the music lolol) and I find some parts of the score to be awkward. What do you think?? See ya! Vals I.pdf

This is my first attempt at sustained 4-part counterpoint. How did I do? Audio – https://soundcloud.com/guy-shahar/track-16-vocal-quartet-satb?in=guy-shahar/sets/new-compositions-2024&si=d2d57780dc6f4ae7a75b7ea8a5dbdbe3&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing Score – https://heartfulhealing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Track-16-Score.pdf I don’t usually ask for feedback on the score, as I barely read music and tend to just rely on the one Cubase generates. It’s way out of my comfort zone, but I think it’s probably time for me to get the hang of the basics of scoring, so I’ve got Dorico and have been trying (hard) to get it to help me. How does this one read? What adjustments should I bear in mind for scoring my next piece?

Here are two songs for voice I wrote back in February. These are pieces I wrote shortly after a break to composition, I was too busy to write anything for most of last semester. They are a setting of Goethe's two "Wandreres Nachtlied" poems, famously set by Schubert and Liszt among others. I wrote this pair of songs on/around Valentine's Day, I had a lot on my mind and these were the output of that. I'll be performing them myself relatively soon, as will a friend of mine, and I will post a real recording soon. In the mean time, enjoy the MIDI 😝 Let me know your thoughts!

This canon is based on each of the four contrapuntal transformations of a single dodecaphonic series, initially highlighted in colours corresponding to each of the 12 notes of the tone row. As showcased in the video, said transformations are presented and organized within the melodic line as follows: Original Tone Row - Retrograde - Inverted - Inverted Retrograde. Even though as a perpetual canon it could technically go on forever and always end up in the same pitch, only two complete repetitions of the whole line are shown here: first the one with highlights and labels for each of the transformations amidst the contrapuntal scaffolding, and lastly the one without either. A more tonal-sounding plagal-ish cadence has also been included as a small coda at the end, once the cello completely finishes playing the bass line's 2nd repetition. Enjoy! YouTube video link:

Hi all, Here's a work that laid unfinished for 17 years. Came across it again on the computer and decided to finish the work. It's a set of vignettes (moods) through out a day: Morning Rush 7 AM, Afternoon Dreams 3 PM, Dinner Alone 5 PM, Out the Door 7 PM, Falling Asleep 11 PM ..... and ? Falling asleep are variations of a lullaby I composed for my daughter 47 years ago. Hope you enjoy the work. Mark

Update: Live Performance + Score of this piece:

Hello everyone, My name is Pavle Gavrilović. I’m a composer, songwriter, and multi-instrumentalist from Belgrade, Serbia. After years of dedication, I was honored to be admitted to the Doctor of Musical Arts (DMA) program in Composition at the Jacobs School of Music at Indiana University - one of the top music schools in the U.S. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for me to grow as a composer, artist, and educator. However, as an international student, despite receiving a merit-based scholarship, I still need financial support to cover the high cost of tuition. Sadly, I am not eligible for federal loans or government financial aid. Coming from Serbia, where the average monthly salary is under $1000, this challenge is too big for me and my family to overcome alone. I am trying everything possible - external scholarships, jobs, and now crowdfunding. If you are able to support me, or even just share my campaign, it would truly mean a lot. Every contribution, no matter the size, brings me closer to realizing this dream. Here’s the link to my GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/a1ab789c You can hear my music on - Thank you for reading, Best, Pavle

Here is a revised version of the piece (played with the Flat app). Once again, any and all feedback is appreciated Nocturne Ab (second draft).mid Edit: if this link doesn’t work try the screen recording link Nocturne Ab (second draft).mid

Ah ha! That would explain it!

A project that was rejected and never saw the light of day.

Thanks very much, Pate. Yes, I'm pretty sure that's where I went wrong - I didn't realise that their part was meant to be read an octave lower, so it all makes more sense now. They were actually singing an octave lower than I'd though.

I think this insight offers an opportunity for a discussion on how academically trained composers approach/think about composing; and how others who compose with less of an academic training/background approach their projects. Mark

Thanks for the shout out, Henry. I actually record all the parts myself instead of using samples, which may be the difference. As an alto, I generally have the range to also record soprano and tenor parts. The lowest bass parts are too low for me, so I sing them up a few steps and use Garageband's "transpose" feature to shift them back down to where they are supposed to be. It sounds like I've been dropped down a well, but it works well enough.

Hi, guy, I suspect the problem is that an octave above middle C really is quite high for most tenors. Counter tenors can sing that, or higher, but they are an exceedingly rare voice type. The samples you bought may be giving you a more realistic idea of what you would get from a group of vocalists than your composition software. It's not that men who can sing that high don't exist. That is technically a range some tenors can sing in, but only a tiny number. Take a look at some standard choral repertoire and you can start to get an idea of the more commonly used parts of the range for different voice types. And remember that it is only in modern times that we have started using the "modern" tuning. Historic pieces look like they are written higher than they actually were, because the composers and singers were using a different tuning standard when they were written, and they are still performed down at that historically accurate tuning today.

I wrote this piece ten years ago, but have just made a new multitrack recording of the parts, so I thought I would share it here. Yes, you are correct. The bass line is being sung by an alto dropped down a well. (GarageBand makes it possible for me to sing all the parts, but I have to use the transpose feature to record the lowest bass notes, which creates a little distortion to the sound quality). The sheep is a genius of place; why would she stray? Here is the homeland. Here, her mother's house. Feed my sheep. Lead them home. Let them rest. Sisters, all among the hills, chanting their Daily Office: "There the rain licks into little pools. There, a dip to hide new lambs." "Take my coat," she said. "You are a guest."

Who doesn't Recognize this " 7 Second Signature Intro " ?

Oh, well... Too late, I already went and rebalanced the audio. Just came back to post it xD

The Levels-Animation above was not Referring to Your Music. It was just an Example of something i did years ago......and taught me to SEE the LEVELS, as opposed to just Trusting my EARS ?..........You cant always Trust your Ears.

The way that musehub works best is if you have it set to launch upon startup. it has little to no impact 🙂 Also, the Musehub login is different from the Musescore.com / .org logins I found a solution to it. I'm going to make a second post with an updated video to resolve some balancing/sound issues, and to showcase the reason why that was happening. To give you a summary, apparently I have to apply a soundflag to each part, and set it to "Classic Phrasing" to fix that... Who knew... lol

Let me try something new. I believe the audio issues that you all are hearing with my uploads are stemming from my use of Dolby Atmos, external speakers, and equalized headphones. I don't have a Raw Audio output to proof listen-to after writing music. The Musescore mixer is also notoriously under-monitoring for gain and overload, as in muse mixer, it didn't indicate this at all. It indicated French Horn was much lower than Trumpet, among other inconsistencies